1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differentiation between low- and high-grade cervical carcinoma: is it efficient?

Polish journal of radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr/190840
Mohamed Ibrahim Amin, A El-Aziz I Amin, Shimaa Elsayed Badr, Noha Yahia Ebaid
{"title":"<sup>1</sup>H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differentiation between low- and high-grade cervical carcinoma: is it efficient?","authors":"Mohamed Ibrahim Amin, A El-Aziz I Amin, Shimaa Elsayed Badr, Noha Yahia Ebaid","doi":"10.5114/pjr/190840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the extent to which magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) lipid metabolites are accurate in predicting high-grade cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective single-centre pilot study included 20 cases with pathologically proven cervical cancer. They underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MRS. Two radiologists, blinded to the histopathological results, with 10 years of experience in gynaecological imaging, independently analysed the MRI images and MRS curves, and a third one resolved any disagreement. Using the histopathological results as a standard test, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was utilised to calculate the optimal lipid peak (1.3 ppm) cutoff for predicting high-grade cervical cancer. The difference in MRS metabolites between low- and high-grade cervical cancer groups was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 11 high-grade and nine low-grade cervical cancer cases based on the histopathological evaluation. A lipid (1.3 ppm) peak of 29.9 was the optimal cutoff for predicting high-grade cervical cancer with 100% sensitivity, 77.8%, specificity, and 90% accuracy. Moreover, there was a significant difference between low- and high-grade cervical cancer cases concerning lipid peak at 0.9 ppm, lipid peak at 1.3 ppm, and the peak of choline with (<i>p</i>-value 0.025, 0.001, and 0.023), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRS might be considered a useful imaging technique for assessing the grade of cervical cancer and improving the planning of treatment. It shows a good diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, it can be adopted in clinical practice for better patient outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"89 ","pages":"e378-e385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/190840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the extent to which magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) lipid metabolites are accurate in predicting high-grade cervical cancer.

Material and methods: This prospective single-centre pilot study included 20 cases with pathologically proven cervical cancer. They underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MRS. Two radiologists, blinded to the histopathological results, with 10 years of experience in gynaecological imaging, independently analysed the MRI images and MRS curves, and a third one resolved any disagreement. Using the histopathological results as a standard test, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was utilised to calculate the optimal lipid peak (1.3 ppm) cutoff for predicting high-grade cervical cancer. The difference in MRS metabolites between low- and high-grade cervical cancer groups was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: The study included 11 high-grade and nine low-grade cervical cancer cases based on the histopathological evaluation. A lipid (1.3 ppm) peak of 29.9 was the optimal cutoff for predicting high-grade cervical cancer with 100% sensitivity, 77.8%, specificity, and 90% accuracy. Moreover, there was a significant difference between low- and high-grade cervical cancer cases concerning lipid peak at 0.9 ppm, lipid peak at 1.3 ppm, and the peak of choline with (p-value 0.025, 0.001, and 0.023), respectively.

Conclusions: MRS might be considered a useful imaging technique for assessing the grade of cervical cancer and improving the planning of treatment. It shows a good diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, it can be adopted in clinical practice for better patient outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1H 磁共振波谱在低级别和高级别宫颈癌鉴别中的应用:有效吗?
目的:评估磁共振波谱(MRS)脂质代谢物在多大程度上能准确预测高级别宫颈癌:这项前瞻性单中心试点研究包括 20 例经病理证实的宫颈癌患者。他们接受了盆腔磁共振成像(MRI)和 MRS 检查。两名对组织病理学结果保密、在妇科成像方面有 10 年经验的放射科医生独立分析 MRI 图像和 MRS 曲线,第三名医生负责解决任何分歧。将组织病理学结果作为标准测试,利用接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线计算出预测高级别宫颈癌的最佳脂质峰(1.3 ppm)临界值。利用曼-惠特尼检验估计了低级别和高级别宫颈癌组之间 MRS 代谢物的差异:根据组织病理学评估,该研究包括 11 例高级别和 9 例低级别的宫颈癌病例。脂质(1.3 ppm)峰值为 29.9 是预测高级别宫颈癌的最佳临界值,灵敏度为 100%,特异度为 77.8%,准确度为 90%。此外,低度和高度宫颈癌病例在 0.9 ppm 的脂质峰、1.3 ppm 的脂质峰和胆碱峰方面存在显著差异(P 值分别为 0.025、0.001 和 0.023):MRS 可被视为评估宫颈癌分级和改善治疗计划的有效成像技术。它显示出良好的诊断准确性。因此,在临床实践中可以采用该技术来改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing radiology education for medical students: leveraging digital tools and resources. Application of ultrasound-guided intranodal lymphangiography in the diagnosis and treatment of chylous ascites after abdominal surgery. Medication-induced changes on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. The peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: a review of the pretreatment approach. Comparative efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus B-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic abscesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1