Post hoc explanations improve consumer responses to algorithmic decisions

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114981
Mehdi Mourali , Dallas Novakowski , Ruth Pogacar , Neil Brigden
{"title":"Post hoc explanations improve consumer responses to algorithmic decisions","authors":"Mehdi Mourali ,&nbsp;Dallas Novakowski ,&nbsp;Ruth Pogacar ,&nbsp;Neil Brigden","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Algorithms are capable of assisting with, or making, critical decisions in many areas of consumers’ lives. Algorithms have consistently outperformed human decision-makers in multiple domains, and the list of cases where algorithms can make superior decisions will only grow as the technology evolves. Nevertheless, many people distrust algorithmic decisions. One concern is their lack of transparency. For instance, it is often unclear how a machine learning algorithm produces a given prediction. To address the problem, organizations have started providing post-hoc explanations of the logic behind their algorithmic decisions. However, it remains unclear to what extent explanations can improve consumer attitudes and intentions. Five experiments demonstrate that algorithmic explanations can improve perceptions of transparency, attitudes, and behavioral intentions – or they can backfire, depending on the explanation method used. The most effective explanations highlight concrete and feasible steps consumers can take to positively influence their future decision outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114981"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004855","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algorithms are capable of assisting with, or making, critical decisions in many areas of consumers’ lives. Algorithms have consistently outperformed human decision-makers in multiple domains, and the list of cases where algorithms can make superior decisions will only grow as the technology evolves. Nevertheless, many people distrust algorithmic decisions. One concern is their lack of transparency. For instance, it is often unclear how a machine learning algorithm produces a given prediction. To address the problem, organizations have started providing post-hoc explanations of the logic behind their algorithmic decisions. However, it remains unclear to what extent explanations can improve consumer attitudes and intentions. Five experiments demonstrate that algorithmic explanations can improve perceptions of transparency, attitudes, and behavioral intentions – or they can backfire, depending on the explanation method used. The most effective explanations highlight concrete and feasible steps consumers can take to positively influence their future decision outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事后解释可改善消费者对算法决策的反应
算法能够在消费者生活的许多领域协助或做出关键决策。算法在多个领域的表现一直优于人类决策者,而且随着技术的发展,算法能够做出卓越决策的案例只会越来越多。然而,许多人并不信任算法决策。其中一个担忧就是算法缺乏透明度。例如,人们往往不清楚机器学习算法是如何做出特定预测的。为了解决这个问题,企业已经开始提供算法决策背后逻辑的事后解释。然而,解释能在多大程度上改善消费者的态度和意图,目前仍不清楚。五项实验表明,算法解释可以提高透明度、改善态度和行为意向,也可能适得其反,这取决于所使用的解释方法。最有效的解释强调了消费者可以采取的具体可行步骤,从而对他们未来的决策结果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1