Rachel R. Mizenko, Madison Feaver, Batuhan T. Bozkurt, Neona Lowe, Bryan Nguyen, Kuan-Wei Huang, Aijun Wang, Randy P. Carney
{"title":"A critical systematic review of extracellular vesicle clinical trials","authors":"Rachel R. Mizenko, Madison Feaver, Batuhan T. Bozkurt, Neona Lowe, Bryan Nguyen, Kuan-Wei Huang, Aijun Wang, Randy P. Carney","doi":"10.1002/jev2.12510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review examines the landscape of extracellular vesicle (EV)-related clinical trials to elucidate the field's trends in clinical applications and EV-related methodologies, with an additional focus on the acknowledgement of EV subpopulations. By analysing data from public reporting repositories, we catalogued 471 EV-related clinical trials to date, with indications for over 200 diseases. Diagnostics and companion diagnostics represented the bulk of EV-related clinical trials with cancer being the most frequent application. EV-related therapeutics trials mainly utilized mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) EVs and were most frequently used for treatment of respiratory illnesses. Ultracentrifugation and RNA-sequencing were the most common isolation and characterization techniques; however, methodology for each was not frequently reported in study records. Most of the reported characterization relied on bulk characterization of EV isolates, with only 11% utilizing EV subpopulations in their experimental design. While this may be connected to a lack of available techniques suitable for clinical implementation, it also highlights the opportunity for use of EV subpopulations to improve translational efforts. As academic research identifies more chemically distinct subpopulations and technologies for their enrichment, we forecast to more refined EV trials in the near future. This review emphasizes the need for meticulous methodological reporting and consideration of EV subpopulations to enhance the translational success of EV-based interventions, pointing towards a paradigm shift in personalized medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":15811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jev2.12510","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jev2.12510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review examines the landscape of extracellular vesicle (EV)-related clinical trials to elucidate the field's trends in clinical applications and EV-related methodologies, with an additional focus on the acknowledgement of EV subpopulations. By analysing data from public reporting repositories, we catalogued 471 EV-related clinical trials to date, with indications for over 200 diseases. Diagnostics and companion diagnostics represented the bulk of EV-related clinical trials with cancer being the most frequent application. EV-related therapeutics trials mainly utilized mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) EVs and were most frequently used for treatment of respiratory illnesses. Ultracentrifugation and RNA-sequencing were the most common isolation and characterization techniques; however, methodology for each was not frequently reported in study records. Most of the reported characterization relied on bulk characterization of EV isolates, with only 11% utilizing EV subpopulations in their experimental design. While this may be connected to a lack of available techniques suitable for clinical implementation, it also highlights the opportunity for use of EV subpopulations to improve translational efforts. As academic research identifies more chemically distinct subpopulations and technologies for their enrichment, we forecast to more refined EV trials in the near future. This review emphasizes the need for meticulous methodological reporting and consideration of EV subpopulations to enhance the translational success of EV-based interventions, pointing towards a paradigm shift in personalized medicine.
这篇系统性综述研究了细胞外囊泡 (EV) 相关临床试验的情况,以阐明该领域在临床应用和 EV 相关方法方面的趋势,并重点关注 EV 亚群的认可情况。通过分析来自公共报告库的数据,我们对迄今为止的 471 项 EV 相关临床试验进行了编目,涉及 200 多种疾病的适应症。诊断和辅助诊断占 EV 相关临床试验的大部分,其中癌症是最常见的应用。EV相关治疗试验主要利用间充质基质细胞(MSC)EV,最常用于治疗呼吸系统疾病。超速离心和RNA测序是最常见的分离和表征技术;然而,研究记录中并没有经常报告每种技术的方法。大多数报告的表征方法都依赖于EV分离物的批量表征,只有11%的研究在实验设计中利用了EV亚群。虽然这可能与缺乏适合临床应用的可用技术有关,但也凸显了利用 EV 亚群改进转化工作的机会。随着学术研究发现更多化学性质截然不同的亚群及其富集技术,我们预测在不久的将来会有更精细的 EV 试验。这篇综述强调了细致的方法学报告和考虑 EV 亚群的必要性,以提高基于 EV 的干预措施的转化成功率,并指出了个性化医学的范式转变。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is an open access research publication that focuses on extracellular vesicles, including microvesicles, exosomes, ectosomes, and apoptotic bodies. It serves as the official journal of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and aims to facilitate the exchange of data, ideas, and information pertaining to the chemistry, biology, and applications of extracellular vesicles. The journal covers various aspects such as the cellular and molecular mechanisms of extracellular vesicles biogenesis, technological advancements in their isolation, quantification, and characterization, the role and function of extracellular vesicles in biology, stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their biology, as well as the application of extracellular vesicles for pharmacological, immunological, or genetic therapies.
The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is widely recognized and indexed by numerous services, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Current Contents/Life Sciences, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Google Scholar, ProQuest Natural Science Collection, ProQuest SciTech Collection, SciTech Premium Collection, PubMed Central/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, ScienceOpen, and Scopus.