Crop Contamination Evaluation by Antimicrobial-resistant Bacteria via Livestock Waste Compost-Fertilized Field Soil

IF 12.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Hazardous Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135987
Yoshihiro Suzuki, Tomoyuki Horita, Emi Nishimura, Hui Xie, Soichiro Tamai, Ikuo Kobayashi, Akira Fukuda, Masaru Usui
{"title":"Crop Contamination Evaluation by Antimicrobial-resistant Bacteria via Livestock Waste Compost-Fertilized Field Soil","authors":"Yoshihiro Suzuki, Tomoyuki Horita, Emi Nishimura, Hui Xie, Soichiro Tamai, Ikuo Kobayashi, Akira Fukuda, Masaru Usui","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, selected by antimicrobial agent use in livestock, are emerging and their spread to crops from feces via composting represents a public health concern as they are ultimately transmitted to humans. In this study, we investigated <em>Escherichia coli</em> and other ampicillin (AMP)-resistant coliform spread conditions in field soil and dent corn, an agricultural crop, on a livestock-derived compost-applying farm. No AMP-resistant <em>E. coli</em> was detected in any samples of field soil and dent corn. In contrast, AMP-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactam (ESBL) producing coliforms were consistently present in field soil and dent corn during the entire study period. In particular, extremely high AMP-resistant coliform levels were detected in dent corn stems and roots. AMP-resistant coliform detection in crops is pivotal and raises significant concerns regarding antimicrobial-resistant bacterial spread. Furthermore, AMP-resistant coliform isolate identification defined <em>Enterobacter bugandensis</em> and <em>Enterobacter asburiae</em> as the dominant species among AMP-resistant coliforms, both tested positive for ESBL production. This means that high concentrations of AMP-resistant coliforms are to be present on farms where crops are grown. However, we identified no common species among the AMP-resistant coliforms in the compost, field soil, and dent corn samples. Therefore, the initial hypothesis of the compost being the source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria was not confirmed. Although their source remains unknown, a certain antimicrobial-resistant bacterial concentration could nonetheless be detected in the field.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135987","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, selected by antimicrobial agent use in livestock, are emerging and their spread to crops from feces via composting represents a public health concern as they are ultimately transmitted to humans. In this study, we investigated Escherichia coli and other ampicillin (AMP)-resistant coliform spread conditions in field soil and dent corn, an agricultural crop, on a livestock-derived compost-applying farm. No AMP-resistant E. coli was detected in any samples of field soil and dent corn. In contrast, AMP-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactam (ESBL) producing coliforms were consistently present in field soil and dent corn during the entire study period. In particular, extremely high AMP-resistant coliform levels were detected in dent corn stems and roots. AMP-resistant coliform detection in crops is pivotal and raises significant concerns regarding antimicrobial-resistant bacterial spread. Furthermore, AMP-resistant coliform isolate identification defined Enterobacter bugandensis and Enterobacter asburiae as the dominant species among AMP-resistant coliforms, both tested positive for ESBL production. This means that high concentrations of AMP-resistant coliforms are to be present on farms where crops are grown. However, we identified no common species among the AMP-resistant coliforms in the compost, field soil, and dent corn samples. Therefore, the initial hypothesis of the compost being the source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria was not confirmed. Although their source remains unknown, a certain antimicrobial-resistant bacterial concentration could nonetheless be detected in the field.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
畜禽粪便堆肥肥田土壤中抗菌细菌对作物污染的评估
因在家畜中使用抗菌剂而被选中的抗菌细菌正在不断出现,它们通过堆肥从粪便中传播到农作物中,并最终传染给人类,这引起了公共卫生方面的关注。在这项研究中,我们调查了一个施用堆肥的畜牧农场的大肠埃希氏菌和其他耐氨苄西林(AMP)大肠菌群在田间土壤和农作物玉米凹陷中的传播情况。在田间土壤和玉米秸秆样本中均未检测到耐 AMP 大肠杆菌。相比之下,在整个研究期间,田间土壤和有齿玉米中一直存在耐 AMP 大肠菌群和产广谱 β-内酰胺(ESBL)大肠菌群。特别是,在无齿玉米的茎和根中检测到的耐 AMP 大肠菌群含量极高。在农作物中检测到耐 AMP 大肠菌群至关重要,并引发了对耐抗菌素细菌传播的严重关切。此外,耐 AMP 大肠菌群分离鉴定确定,Enterobacter bugandensis 和 Enterobacter asburiae 是耐 AMP 大肠菌群中的主要菌种,这两种菌在 ESBL 生产检测中均呈阳性。这意味着种植农作物的农场中可能存在高浓度的耐 AMP 大肠菌群。不过,我们在堆肥、田间土壤和玉米凹陷样本中都没有发现耐 AMP 大肠菌群的共同物种。因此,堆肥是抗微生物细菌来源的最初假设并未得到证实。虽然它们的来源仍然未知,但在田间还是可以检测到一定浓度的抗菌细菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal of Hazardous Materials 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3059
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.
期刊最新文献
Insights into the stability assessment and reaction mechanisms of Mn-oxide-containing adsorbents for As(Ⅲ) removal in filter columns: Migration laws and stabilization mechanisms of Mn element A Review of Hydroxyapatite Synthesis for Heavy Metal Adsorption Assisted by Machine Learning Fabrication of MOF-on-MOF composites by surfactant-assisted growth strategy for SPME of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Short-term polystyrene nanoplastic exposure alters zebrafish male and female germ line and reproductive outcomes, unveiling pollutant-impacted molecular pathways Effects of UV degradation on building materials with emphasis on microplastic generation potential
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1