A Novel Prediction Model for Debris Flow Mean Velocity Based on Small Sample Data Taking Jiangjia Gully Watershed as an Example

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1002/nag.3850
He Wei Kuang, Zhi Yong Ai, Gan Lin Gu
{"title":"A Novel Prediction Model for Debris Flow Mean Velocity Based on Small Sample Data Taking Jiangjia Gully Watershed as an Example","authors":"He Wei Kuang,&nbsp;Zhi Yong Ai,&nbsp;Gan Lin Gu","doi":"10.1002/nag.3850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Among all the factors affecting the destructiveness of debris flow, the mean velocity is one of the most important characteristics. In this paper, we aim to apply a particle swarm optimization (PSO) based on the relevance vector machine (RVM) to predict the mean velocity. The PSO is used to optimize kernel parameters inside the RVM, whereas the RVM is responsible for completing the prediction task. Through sample training, a nonlinear relationship can be obtained, enabling a rapid prediction of the mean velocity for new samples. The debris flow dataset of Jiangjia Gully is used to evaluate the performance of PSO-RVM in this study. Besides, we further compare the prediction results of PSO-RVM with other prominent approaches, for example, the support vector machine (SVM), BP neural network (BP), and the RVM. The results show that the mean relative error (MRE) of PSO-RVM is only 0.69%. In addition, BP yields the highest MRE (27.61%), and the MRE (2.75%) corresponding to the RVM is lower than that (5.98%) yielded by the SVM. For the root mean square error (RMSE) and Theil's inequality coefficient (TIC), the PSO-RVM method still generates much lower RMSE (6.48%) and TIC (0.179%) values than the other three methods. Overall, compared with current debris flow prediction models, the PSO-RVM achieves high prediction accuracy, fewer optimization parameters, and low computational complexity. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to explore the dominative factors of debris flow.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"48 18","pages":"4399-4409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among all the factors affecting the destructiveness of debris flow, the mean velocity is one of the most important characteristics. In this paper, we aim to apply a particle swarm optimization (PSO) based on the relevance vector machine (RVM) to predict the mean velocity. The PSO is used to optimize kernel parameters inside the RVM, whereas the RVM is responsible for completing the prediction task. Through sample training, a nonlinear relationship can be obtained, enabling a rapid prediction of the mean velocity for new samples. The debris flow dataset of Jiangjia Gully is used to evaluate the performance of PSO-RVM in this study. Besides, we further compare the prediction results of PSO-RVM with other prominent approaches, for example, the support vector machine (SVM), BP neural network (BP), and the RVM. The results show that the mean relative error (MRE) of PSO-RVM is only 0.69%. In addition, BP yields the highest MRE (27.61%), and the MRE (2.75%) corresponding to the RVM is lower than that (5.98%) yielded by the SVM. For the root mean square error (RMSE) and Theil's inequality coefficient (TIC), the PSO-RVM method still generates much lower RMSE (6.48%) and TIC (0.179%) values than the other three methods. Overall, compared with current debris flow prediction models, the PSO-RVM achieves high prediction accuracy, fewer optimization parameters, and low computational complexity. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to explore the dominative factors of debris flow.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以蒋家沟流域为例,基于小样本数据的泥石流平均流速新型预测模型
在影响泥石流破坏性的所有因素中,平均速度是最重要的特征之一。本文旨在应用基于相关性向量机(RVM)的粒子群优化(PSO)来预测平均速度。PSO 用于优化 RVM 内部的核参数,而 RVM 则负责完成预测任务。通过样本训练,可以获得非线性关系,从而快速预测新样本的平均速度。本研究使用蒋家沟泥石流数据集来评估 PSO-RVM 的性能。此外,我们还进一步比较了 PSO-RVM 与其他著名方法(如支持向量机(SVM)、BP 神经网络(BP)和 RVM)的预测结果。结果显示,PSO-RVM 的平均相对误差(MRE)仅为 0.69%。此外,BP 的平均相对误差(MRE)最高(27.61%),RVM 的平均相对误差(2.75%)低于 SVM 的平均相对误差(5.98%)。在均方根误差(RMSE)和 Theil 不等式系数(TIC)方面,PSO-RVM 方法产生的均方根误差(RMSE)(6.48%)和 TIC(0.179%)值仍远低于其他三种方法。总体而言,与目前的泥石流预测模型相比,PSO-RVM 预测精度高、优化参数少、计算复杂度低。最后,进行了敏感性分析,以探讨泥石流的主导因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
期刊最新文献
A POD‐TANN Approach for the Multiscale Modeling of Materials and Macro‐Element Derivation in Geomechanics Adaptive Mesh Generation and Numerical Verification for Complex Rock Structures Based on Optimization and Iteration Algorithms Issue Information Analysis of Fracturing Above Block Caving Back: A Spherical Shell Theory Approach and BEM Numerical Simulation Data‐Driven Tools to Evaluate Support Pressure, Radial Displacements, and Face Extrusion for Tunnels Excavated in Elastoplastic Grounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1