Kinetic insights into energy-saving and low-carbon reactive distillation processes for the transesterification to dimethyl carbonate

IF 8.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Separation and Purification Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129745
{"title":"Kinetic insights into energy-saving and low-carbon reactive distillation processes for the transesterification to dimethyl carbonate","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transesterification of propylene carbonate (PC) or ethylene carbonate (EC) to dimethyl carbonate (DMC) by using catalytic reactive distillation (RD) is a promising approach for carbon dioxide utilization. However, there is still scarcity of comprehensive comparison between the two RD processes. Hence, using the UNIQUAC model and kinetics calibrated by literature and our experiments, we conduct an extensive comparison of the two RD processes. Based on the kinetic insights, laboratory RD processes for both reactions are modeled, analyzed, and experimentally validated. Consequently, two RD processes designed to produce 60 ktpy of DMC are optimized and compared. The interplay and control factors between reaction and separation are elucidated and clarified via investigating variations of the actual chemical equilibrium constant profile compared with theoretical values along the reactive section at various pressures, liquid holdups, etc. The results reveal that the optimized EC RD process achieves almost 50 % reductions in both total annual cost and carbon dioxide emission compared to the PC RD process. This work facilitates the carbon neutrality and provides an essential guide for quantitatively assessing the two routes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586624034841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transesterification of propylene carbonate (PC) or ethylene carbonate (EC) to dimethyl carbonate (DMC) by using catalytic reactive distillation (RD) is a promising approach for carbon dioxide utilization. However, there is still scarcity of comprehensive comparison between the two RD processes. Hence, using the UNIQUAC model and kinetics calibrated by literature and our experiments, we conduct an extensive comparison of the two RD processes. Based on the kinetic insights, laboratory RD processes for both reactions are modeled, analyzed, and experimentally validated. Consequently, two RD processes designed to produce 60 ktpy of DMC are optimized and compared. The interplay and control factors between reaction and separation are elucidated and clarified via investigating variations of the actual chemical equilibrium constant profile compared with theoretical values along the reactive section at various pressures, liquid holdups, etc. The results reveal that the optimized EC RD process achieves almost 50 % reductions in both total annual cost and carbon dioxide emission compared to the PC RD process. This work facilitates the carbon neutrality and provides an essential guide for quantitatively assessing the two routes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节能低碳反应蒸馏工艺在酯交换制碳酸二甲酯过程中的动力学启示
利用催化反应蒸馏(RD)将碳酸丙烯酯(PC)或碳酸乙烯酯(EC)酯化为碳酸二甲酯(DMC)是一种很有前景的二氧化碳利用方法。然而,目前仍缺乏对这两种 RD 工艺的全面比较。因此,我们利用 UNIQUAC 模型以及经文献和实验校准的动力学,对两种 RD 过程进行了广泛的比较。根据动力学见解,我们对两种反应的实验室 RD 过程进行了建模、分析和实验验证。因此,我们对设计用于生产 60 ktpy DMC 的两种 RD 工艺进行了优化和比较。通过研究在不同压力、液体截留等条件下,反应段的实际化学平衡常数曲线与理论值的比较变化,阐明并澄清了反应与分离之间的相互作用和控制因素。结果表明,与 PC RD 工艺相比,经过优化的 EC RD 工艺在年度总成本和二氧化碳排放量方面都减少了近 50%。这项工作有助于实现碳中和,并为定量评估这两种工艺提供了重要指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Separation and Purification Technology
Separation and Purification Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2347
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
The enhanced mechanism of ZnIn2S4-CoFe2O4-BC activated peroxomonosulfate under visible light for the degradation of fluoroquinolones Techno-economic insights into one-pot bacterial astaxanthin extraction and sustainable therapeutic product development using natural solvent mixtures Catalytic combustion of propane over second metal-modified Ru supported on CeO2 nanosheet Comparative study for removal of potentially toxic metals from the groundwater of Lakhanpur Area, Odisha, India by using two different hydrogels Facile fabrication of robust cork-inspired superhydrophobic aerogel for continuous oil spill and emulsion absorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1