Quantifying and visualising uncertainty in deep learning-based segmentation for radiation therapy treatment planning: What do radiation oncologists and therapists want?

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110545
M. Huet-Dastarac , N.M.C. van Acht , F.C. Maruccio , J.E. van Aalst , J.C.J. van Oorschodt , F. Cnossen , T.M. Janssen , C.L. Brouwer , A. Barragan Montero , C.W. Hurkmans
{"title":"Quantifying and visualising uncertainty in deep learning-based segmentation for radiation therapy treatment planning: What do radiation oncologists and therapists want?","authors":"M. Huet-Dastarac ,&nbsp;N.M.C. van Acht ,&nbsp;F.C. Maruccio ,&nbsp;J.E. van Aalst ,&nbsp;J.C.J. van Oorschodt ,&nbsp;F. Cnossen ,&nbsp;T.M. Janssen ,&nbsp;C.L. Brouwer ,&nbsp;A. Barragan Montero ,&nbsp;C.W. Hurkmans","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>During the ESTRO 2023 physics workshop on “AI for the fully automated radiotherapy treatment chain”, the topic of deep learning (DL) segmentation was discussed. Despite its widespread use in radiotherapy, the time needed to evaluate and correct DL segmentations remains burdensome. While segmentation uncertainty could be beneficial for clinicians, there is a lack of understanding on what information should be presented to ease their task. This study aimed to gather insights from clinicians on uncertainty visualisation options.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Two sessions of structured interviews were conducted across four institutions already using DL segmentation clinically. The first session focused on the main problems hindering the clinical use of DL. In the second session, ten visualisation options displaying uncertainty information at different levels (structure, slice, or voxel) with binary or continuous values were presented. Dosimetric information was also present in some visualisations. For each case, sixteen clinicians (radiation oncologists and radiation therapists) were asked to grade an overall score, the usability, the training required, and the expected time gain.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants preferred the binary voxel-level uncertainty visualisation, followed by binary structure-level uncertainty visualisation. Combining structure-level and voxel-level visualisation methods has been proposed as a promising approach. The benefits of dosimetric information were perceived diversely among participants since it complexifies the display but could be useful for the online adaptive workflow.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preferences for uncertainty visualisation methods were assessed within a multi-institutional experienced group of clinicians. Further refinement of preferences may help in selecting the best options for clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 110545"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

During the ESTRO 2023 physics workshop on “AI for the fully automated radiotherapy treatment chain”, the topic of deep learning (DL) segmentation was discussed. Despite its widespread use in radiotherapy, the time needed to evaluate and correct DL segmentations remains burdensome. While segmentation uncertainty could be beneficial for clinicians, there is a lack of understanding on what information should be presented to ease their task. This study aimed to gather insights from clinicians on uncertainty visualisation options.

Materials and methods

Two sessions of structured interviews were conducted across four institutions already using DL segmentation clinically. The first session focused on the main problems hindering the clinical use of DL. In the second session, ten visualisation options displaying uncertainty information at different levels (structure, slice, or voxel) with binary or continuous values were presented. Dosimetric information was also present in some visualisations. For each case, sixteen clinicians (radiation oncologists and radiation therapists) were asked to grade an overall score, the usability, the training required, and the expected time gain.

Results

Participants preferred the binary voxel-level uncertainty visualisation, followed by binary structure-level uncertainty visualisation. Combining structure-level and voxel-level visualisation methods has been proposed as a promising approach. The benefits of dosimetric information were perceived diversely among participants since it complexifies the display but could be useful for the online adaptive workflow.

Conclusion

Preferences for uncertainty visualisation methods were assessed within a multi-institutional experienced group of clinicians. Further refinement of preferences may help in selecting the best options for clinical implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化和可视化基于深度学习的放疗治疗计划分割中的不确定性:放射肿瘤学家和治疗师想要什么?
背景和目的在 ESTRO 2023 物理研讨会 "全自动放射治疗链的人工智能 "上,讨论了深度学习(DL)分割的主题。尽管深度学习在放疗中得到了广泛应用,但评估和纠正深度学习分割所需的时间仍然十分繁重。虽然分割的不确定性可能对临床医生有益,但对于应提供哪些信息以减轻他们的任务却缺乏了解。本研究旨在收集临床医生对不确定性可视化选项的见解。材料和方法对已在临床上使用 DL 分割的四家机构进行了两次结构化访谈。第一次访谈的重点是阻碍 DL 临床应用的主要问题。在第二个环节中,介绍了十种可视化选项,这些选项显示了不同层面(结构、切片或体素)的不确定性信息,并带有二进制或连续值。一些可视化选项还显示了剂量信息。对于每种情况,16 名临床医生(放射肿瘤学家和放射治疗专家)被要求对总体得分、可用性、所需培训和预期时间收益进行评分。结果参与者更喜欢二进制体素级不确定性可视化,其次是二进制结构级不确定性可视化。将结构级和体素级可视化方法结合起来是一种很有前途的方法。参与者对剂量信息的益处看法不一,因为它使显示复杂化,但对在线自适应工作流程可能有用。对偏好的进一步细化可能有助于为临床实施选择最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Dosimetric impact of sparing base of heart on organ at risk doses during lung radiotherapy Evaluating and reporting LET and RBE-weighted dose in proton therapy for glioma – The Dutch approach A critical reflection of radiotherapy on osseous free flaps in mandibular segmental resection and immediate reconstruction in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort study Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies Deep learning-based multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive treatment planning approach to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1