Quantifying and visualising uncertainty in deep learning-based segmentation for radiation therapy treatment planning: What do radiation oncologists and therapists want?
M. Huet-Dastarac , N.M.C. van Acht , F.C. Maruccio , J.E. van Aalst , J.C.J. van Oorschodt , F. Cnossen , T.M. Janssen , C.L. Brouwer , A. Barragan Montero , C.W. Hurkmans
{"title":"Quantifying and visualising uncertainty in deep learning-based segmentation for radiation therapy treatment planning: What do radiation oncologists and therapists want?","authors":"M. Huet-Dastarac , N.M.C. van Acht , F.C. Maruccio , J.E. van Aalst , J.C.J. van Oorschodt , F. Cnossen , T.M. Janssen , C.L. Brouwer , A. Barragan Montero , C.W. Hurkmans","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>During the ESTRO 2023 physics workshop on “AI for the fully automated radiotherapy treatment chain”, the topic of deep learning (DL) segmentation was discussed. Despite its widespread use in radiotherapy, the time needed to evaluate and correct DL segmentations remains burdensome. While segmentation uncertainty could be beneficial for clinicians, there is a lack of understanding on what information should be presented to ease their task. This study aimed to gather insights from clinicians on uncertainty visualisation options.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Two sessions of structured interviews were conducted across four institutions already using DL segmentation clinically. The first session focused on the main problems hindering the clinical use of DL. In the second session, ten visualisation options displaying uncertainty information at different levels (structure, slice, or voxel) with binary or continuous values were presented. Dosimetric information was also present in some visualisations. For each case, sixteen clinicians (radiation oncologists and radiation therapists) were asked to grade an overall score, the usability, the training required, and the expected time gain.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants preferred the binary voxel-level uncertainty visualisation, followed by binary structure-level uncertainty visualisation. Combining structure-level and voxel-level visualisation methods has been proposed as a promising approach. The benefits of dosimetric information were perceived diversely among participants since it complexifies the display but could be useful for the online adaptive workflow.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preferences for uncertainty visualisation methods were assessed within a multi-institutional experienced group of clinicians. Further refinement of preferences may help in selecting the best options for clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 110545"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose
During the ESTRO 2023 physics workshop on “AI for the fully automated radiotherapy treatment chain”, the topic of deep learning (DL) segmentation was discussed. Despite its widespread use in radiotherapy, the time needed to evaluate and correct DL segmentations remains burdensome. While segmentation uncertainty could be beneficial for clinicians, there is a lack of understanding on what information should be presented to ease their task. This study aimed to gather insights from clinicians on uncertainty visualisation options.
Materials and methods
Two sessions of structured interviews were conducted across four institutions already using DL segmentation clinically. The first session focused on the main problems hindering the clinical use of DL. In the second session, ten visualisation options displaying uncertainty information at different levels (structure, slice, or voxel) with binary or continuous values were presented. Dosimetric information was also present in some visualisations. For each case, sixteen clinicians (radiation oncologists and radiation therapists) were asked to grade an overall score, the usability, the training required, and the expected time gain.
Results
Participants preferred the binary voxel-level uncertainty visualisation, followed by binary structure-level uncertainty visualisation. Combining structure-level and voxel-level visualisation methods has been proposed as a promising approach. The benefits of dosimetric information were perceived diversely among participants since it complexifies the display but could be useful for the online adaptive workflow.
Conclusion
Preferences for uncertainty visualisation methods were assessed within a multi-institutional experienced group of clinicians. Further refinement of preferences may help in selecting the best options for clinical implementation.
期刊介绍:
Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.