Ephemeral river islands serve as roosting and foraging habitat for boreal and austral migratory songbirds

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4432
Valentina Gómez-Bahamón, José D. Femayor-Pérez, Riquelme Durán, Santiago J. Monroy-García, Nairo Gutiérrez, David Ricardo Caro-R, Kevin J. Kardynal, David P. L. Toews, Nicholas Bayly
{"title":"Ephemeral river islands serve as roosting and foraging habitat for boreal and austral migratory songbirds","authors":"Valentina Gómez-Bahamón,&nbsp;José D. Femayor-Pérez,&nbsp;Riquelme Durán,&nbsp;Santiago J. Monroy-García,&nbsp;Nairo Gutiérrez,&nbsp;David Ricardo Caro-R,&nbsp;Kevin J. Kardynal,&nbsp;David P. L. Toews,&nbsp;Nicholas Bayly","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Migratory birds use different habitats throughout the year as they move between their breeding and nonbreeding grounds. Those that breed in temperate areas can spend more than half of the year elsewhere during migration, at stopovers where they rest and refuel, and at distant nonbreeding localities (Newton, <span>2007</span>). Therefore, studying the nonbreeding ecology of migratory species is key to understanding their needs throughout the annual cycle. However, knowledge of habitat use and quality in nonbreeding areas is unknown in many cases, particularly for long-distance migrants. Here, we document the role of ephemeral riverine islands in the Meta River in eastern Colombia as habitats where multiple Nearctic-Neotropical migratory songbirds (i.e., those that breed in the northern hemisphere) and Austral-Neotropical migrants (i.e., those that breed in the southern hemisphere) co-occur during migration and the stationary nonbreeding period (Figure 1), using islands both for foraging and roosting.</p><p>Ephemeral islands in the Meta River are mostly submerged during the peak of the rainy season (end of May through September) and emerge with subsiding water levels as the rainy season ends, persisting throughout the dry season and until the next rainy season takes hold (October through the beginning of May) (Figure 1). The emergence of these islands is followed by the rapid colonization and growth of grasses and a fast-growing pioneer shrub (<i>Tessaria integrifolia</i>, Asteraceae), which can reach up to 3 m in height and which form dense thickets (Remsen &amp; Parker, <span>1983</span>). It was in this vegetation that we discovered thousands of roosting migratory songbirds. Through a subsequent exploration of records in a community science database (eBird; Sullivan et al., <span>2009</span>), we learned that the phenology of island emergence and subsequent vegetation growth coincides with the presence and peak abundance of migratory songbirds in the Casanare department of Colombia (Figure 2).</p><p>As a group, North American migratory songbirds are in steep decline (Rosenberg et al., <span>2019</span>). As part of a larger project that our team is developing to explore the potential threats to migratory songbirds while on stopover or occupying stationary nonbreeding areas in eastern Colombia, we aimed to describe habitats used for foraging and roosting, with an initial focus on migratory swallows (Hirundinidae). We centered our observations on the riverside town of Orocue, Casanare, during April of 2022 and March–April 2023. We observed and followed large flocks of swallows (e.g., Barn Swallows, <i>Hirundo rustica</i>) over grasslands and near the river throughout the day and found that large groups were congregating over the Meta River at dusk to forage on flying insects before heading to unknown roost sites. To find the exact location of roosts, we observed the flight paths of birds and projected their likely destinations. This led to the observation that multiple birds appeared to land at dusk on riverine islands that were densely vegetated with <i>T. integrifolia</i>.</p><p>Subsequently, we inspected one of the islands which had a surface area of ~30 hectares and found that the leaves of <i>T. integrifolia</i> had a substantial amount of bird feces covering them, indicating a likely roosting location. We then waited for dusk by the edge of the vegetation and documented the arrival of thousands of migratory songbirds of different species, descending from the sky into the vegetation on the island. We identified birds to species based on a combination of field marks and expert inference and estimated the number of individuals of each species that landed in the area where we were standing. We also documented the departure of birds from this same roosting site at dawn (Appendix S1: Figures S1 and S2 and Videos S1 and S2). The sheer number and diversity of migratory birds roosting together was unexpected.</p><p>Our observations indicated that thousands of Austral-Neotropical and Nearctic-Neotropical migratory songbirds co-occur on these ephemeral islands for at least several weeks in April, which coincides with the boreal spring migration and the austral fall migration (e.g., Figure 1). We observed thousands of Barn Swallows and Fork-tailed Flycatchers (<i>Tyrannus savana</i>) at the roost, as well as hundreds of Bank Swallows (<i>Riparia riparia</i>). We also documented thousands of Dickcissels (<i>Spiza americana</i>) on the same ephemeral islands, but they were foraging over areas of tall grass. Finally, we also observed tens of Yellow Warblers (<i>Setophaga petechia</i>) and Northern Waterthrushes (<i>Parkesia noveboracensis</i>) foraging for insects in the <i>T. integrifolia</i> throughout the day, and roosting with the other migratory species that arrived at dusk. Although we observed Cliff Swallows (<i>Petrochelidon pyrrhonota</i>) foraging over the savannas near Orocue, we did not record this species at the island roost. Notably, two of the observed species have been designated as Species At Risk in Canada including Barn Swallow (population trend −73% over 50 years) and Bank Swallow (−93%) (Smith et al., <span>2023</span>). These same species, as well as Dickcissels (−14%), have been designated as Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the United States (Rosenberg et al., <span>2016</span>).</p><p>To explore how migrant presence and abundance varies in relation to the flood cycles of the Meta River, we analyzed bird observations submitted by birdwatchers to the eBird database for the year 2022 in the Casanare Department (Sullivan et al., <span>2009</span>). We found that both boreal and austral migratory songbird abundance peaked in the Casanare Department in March and April (Figure 2A). The increase in precipitation also likely boosts insect availability (Poulin et al., <span>1992</span>). For instance, in Villavicencio—a city in the vicinity of our study area that has similar precipitation phenology—different species of mosquitoes begin increasing in abundance at the end of the dry season, reaching their peak of abundance in May (Bates, <span>1945</span>). That phenological increase in mosquito abundance coincides with the arrival and increase in abundance of these aerial insectivorous migratory songbirds in the area (Figure 2B–G).</p><p>Ephemeral river islands vary from year to year depending on the intensity of the rainy season. Moreover, islands likely vary in number and size along different parts of the river. Factors such as water currents, types of sediments, and the presence of tributaries may influence the formation and persistence of these islands. Aiming to understand how islands are distributed along the Meta River, we first used satellite images, derived from Google Earth (Images © 2013–2014 Maxar Technologies, CNES/Airbus, Airbus and Landsat/Copernicus), to estimate the reach of the river, starting from the mouth of the Metica River to the mouth of the Meta River where it meets with the Orinoco River (Figure 3A). Then, we divided the river into transects of 100 km in length and we estimated the sizes of islands using the polygon function in Google Earth (Figure 3A). We found that there were hundreds of islands spread along the Meta River at the time when the satellite images were taken, ranging in size from about 5 to 18,000 ha with mean size of about 160 ha (Figure 3A). We also found that the number of islands and their total size slightly increased downstream toward the east (Figure 3C,D).</p><p>Ephemeral river islands are constantly undergoing successional dynamics, providing a unique and arguably stable niche for transient communities of migratory songbirds to exploit during the nonbreeding period. We hypothesize that pioneer riparian vegetation associated with ephemeral substrate, such as <i>T. integrifolia</i>, provides an important habitat for insectivorous migratory songbirds in South America. In fact, Alder Flycatchers (<i>Empidonax alnorum</i>) have also been observed defending territories in <i>T. integrifolia</i> in the wintering grounds in Argentina (Areta et al., <span>2016</span>). The diversity in island size in the Meta River provides a favorable system to study the relationship between island ephemerality, river geomorphology, and migratory songbird habitat preference. Island size likely influences island persistence, the abundance of pioneer vegetation in the area, and potentially avian use.</p><p>Moreover, the ephemeral dynamics of island emergence coinciding with the arrival of migratory songbirds and an increase in insect abundance also sets the stage for the formation of transient ecological communities that appear every year. Attributes related to whether these islands are connected to the mainland, their size, and age (if they survived the previous rainy seasons), potentially influence the presence of predators such as large mammals and snakes, and the probability of migratory songbirds establishing a roosting site there. For example, on the rivers of Manú National Park in Peru, year-round resident bird species that nest on islands disconnected from the mainland experience lower nest predation rates than those that nest on the mainland (Ocampo &amp; Londoño, <span>2015</span>). Colonial birds in the family Icteridae in equatorial latitudes also prefer river islands for breeding as they are protected from predatory mammals and snakes (Robinson, <span>1985</span>). We believe that roosting migratory songbirds likely minimize predation risk by using riverine islands, a hypothesis that remains to be explicitly tested.</p><p>Similar dynamics of ephemeral island phenology have been documented for the Amazon basin, where these systems have promoted the evolution of a unique nonmigratory avifauna specialized in utilizing and dispersing among these dynamic islands (Johnson et al., <span>2023</span>; Luna et al., <span>2022</span>; Remsen &amp; Parker, <span>1983</span>). Moreover, these “resident” bird species in ephemeral islands in the Amazon basin have been noted to occur in densities an order of magnitude higher than those found in communities on the mainland (Remsen &amp; Parker, <span>1983</span>). Our observations suggest high densities of migratory songbirds occupying ephemeral river islands in the Meta River in comparison to the mainland.</p><p>The Orinoco Plains and the Amazon are adjacent regions, and while they share some avian species, they also differ, largely because the Orinoco has extensive areas of grasslands surrounded by riparian forest, while the Amazon is largely forested. Although these two regions have similar phenological dynamics of precipitation (e.g., Silva et al., <span>2021</span>), habitat differences influence the type of resources available and thus the species that inhabit those areas. Indeed, the migratory species that we reported in the Meta River prefer to forage over grasslands or in riparian habitats when on their nonbreeding grounds. In contrast, seasonally flooded islands in the Brazilian Amazon have been found to be important roosting sites for the Purple Martin (<i>Progne subis</i>; a species not observed in Orocue) (Fraser et al., <span>2017</span>; Santos et al., <span>2021</span>), with one island on the Rio Negro hosting over 250,000 roosting individuals between February and April (Grossman, <span>2022</span>).</p><p>During expeditions to the Meta River's ephemeral islands, we also confirmed migratory and nonmigratory Fork-tailed Flycatchers, identified based on characteristics in Pyle (<span>1997</span>). Some populations, like <i>Tyrannus savana monachus</i> in eastern Colombia, are nonmigratory, while <i>T. s. savana</i> is an Austral-Neotropical migratory group. eBird data for Casanare show year-round presence peaking during migration and the rainy season (Figure 3B,C). Occasionally, nonmigratory individuals with juvenile characteristics joined migratory flocks, but adults were mostly in savannas away from the river suggesting segregation in roost site use. Barn Swallows also exhibit intra-population co-occurrence in April, with boreal and austral breeding populations likely coexisting in eastern Colombia as boreal migrants return northward and austral migrants depart for equatorial latitudes (Winkler et al., <span>2017</span>).</p><p>Speciation in birds appears to happen most commonly through an initial stage of geographic isolation that leads to evolutionary changes resulting in reproductive isolation, followed by range expansion which occasionally leads to secondary contact and further differentiation (Price, <span>2008</span>). However, Fork-tailed Flycatchers and Barn Swallows are diverging with populations co-occurring geographically during part of the year providing potential overlap for breeding to occur. This highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms leading to switches in migratory behavior and those that govern the timing of other life history events such as reproduction and molting.</p><p>In summary, we found that thousands of migratory songbirds that breed in the northern and southern hemispheres co-occur in high densities on ephemeral river islands of the Meta River. Additionally, we found that island flood dynamics are synchronized with the boreal (spring) and austral (fall) migrations. How this ecological association evolved, how tight it is, and the spatial–temporal dynamics remain to be tested. Moreover, how migratory songbirds find and select the islands on which they will roost is an intriguing question given that each year the geomorphology of the river changes. Do they select islands that have fewer ground predators, for example? What are the consequences, both positive and negative, of inter and intraspecies co-occurrence on the individuals and populations using the islands (e.g., competition for resources, disease transmission, speciation)? How dependent are they on the resources that these islands provide at the population and species level? What is the relative importance of these islands compared with other habitats on the landscape given ongoing landscape change? Finally, given the decline of North American migratory aerial insectivorous and other birds (Spiller &amp; Dettmers, <span>2019</span>), should protecting ephemeral islands of the Meta River be a conservation priority? We suggest that conservation measures covering the thousands of hectares of islands likely require a more holistic view of the Meta River—and other rivers like it—with their dynamic phenology and geomorphology.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"105 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4432","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Migratory birds use different habitats throughout the year as they move between their breeding and nonbreeding grounds. Those that breed in temperate areas can spend more than half of the year elsewhere during migration, at stopovers where they rest and refuel, and at distant nonbreeding localities (Newton, 2007). Therefore, studying the nonbreeding ecology of migratory species is key to understanding their needs throughout the annual cycle. However, knowledge of habitat use and quality in nonbreeding areas is unknown in many cases, particularly for long-distance migrants. Here, we document the role of ephemeral riverine islands in the Meta River in eastern Colombia as habitats where multiple Nearctic-Neotropical migratory songbirds (i.e., those that breed in the northern hemisphere) and Austral-Neotropical migrants (i.e., those that breed in the southern hemisphere) co-occur during migration and the stationary nonbreeding period (Figure 1), using islands both for foraging and roosting.

Ephemeral islands in the Meta River are mostly submerged during the peak of the rainy season (end of May through September) and emerge with subsiding water levels as the rainy season ends, persisting throughout the dry season and until the next rainy season takes hold (October through the beginning of May) (Figure 1). The emergence of these islands is followed by the rapid colonization and growth of grasses and a fast-growing pioneer shrub (Tessaria integrifolia, Asteraceae), which can reach up to 3 m in height and which form dense thickets (Remsen & Parker, 1983). It was in this vegetation that we discovered thousands of roosting migratory songbirds. Through a subsequent exploration of records in a community science database (eBird; Sullivan et al., 2009), we learned that the phenology of island emergence and subsequent vegetation growth coincides with the presence and peak abundance of migratory songbirds in the Casanare department of Colombia (Figure 2).

As a group, North American migratory songbirds are in steep decline (Rosenberg et al., 2019). As part of a larger project that our team is developing to explore the potential threats to migratory songbirds while on stopover or occupying stationary nonbreeding areas in eastern Colombia, we aimed to describe habitats used for foraging and roosting, with an initial focus on migratory swallows (Hirundinidae). We centered our observations on the riverside town of Orocue, Casanare, during April of 2022 and March–April 2023. We observed and followed large flocks of swallows (e.g., Barn Swallows, Hirundo rustica) over grasslands and near the river throughout the day and found that large groups were congregating over the Meta River at dusk to forage on flying insects before heading to unknown roost sites. To find the exact location of roosts, we observed the flight paths of birds and projected their likely destinations. This led to the observation that multiple birds appeared to land at dusk on riverine islands that were densely vegetated with T. integrifolia.

Subsequently, we inspected one of the islands which had a surface area of ~30 hectares and found that the leaves of T. integrifolia had a substantial amount of bird feces covering them, indicating a likely roosting location. We then waited for dusk by the edge of the vegetation and documented the arrival of thousands of migratory songbirds of different species, descending from the sky into the vegetation on the island. We identified birds to species based on a combination of field marks and expert inference and estimated the number of individuals of each species that landed in the area where we were standing. We also documented the departure of birds from this same roosting site at dawn (Appendix S1: Figures S1 and S2 and Videos S1 and S2). The sheer number and diversity of migratory birds roosting together was unexpected.

Our observations indicated that thousands of Austral-Neotropical and Nearctic-Neotropical migratory songbirds co-occur on these ephemeral islands for at least several weeks in April, which coincides with the boreal spring migration and the austral fall migration (e.g., Figure 1). We observed thousands of Barn Swallows and Fork-tailed Flycatchers (Tyrannus savana) at the roost, as well as hundreds of Bank Swallows (Riparia riparia). We also documented thousands of Dickcissels (Spiza americana) on the same ephemeral islands, but they were foraging over areas of tall grass. Finally, we also observed tens of Yellow Warblers (Setophaga petechia) and Northern Waterthrushes (Parkesia noveboracensis) foraging for insects in the T. integrifolia throughout the day, and roosting with the other migratory species that arrived at dusk. Although we observed Cliff Swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) foraging over the savannas near Orocue, we did not record this species at the island roost. Notably, two of the observed species have been designated as Species At Risk in Canada including Barn Swallow (population trend −73% over 50 years) and Bank Swallow (−93%) (Smith et al., 2023). These same species, as well as Dickcissels (−14%), have been designated as Species of Greatest Conservation Need in the United States (Rosenberg et al., 2016).

To explore how migrant presence and abundance varies in relation to the flood cycles of the Meta River, we analyzed bird observations submitted by birdwatchers to the eBird database for the year 2022 in the Casanare Department (Sullivan et al., 2009). We found that both boreal and austral migratory songbird abundance peaked in the Casanare Department in March and April (Figure 2A). The increase in precipitation also likely boosts insect availability (Poulin et al., 1992). For instance, in Villavicencio—a city in the vicinity of our study area that has similar precipitation phenology—different species of mosquitoes begin increasing in abundance at the end of the dry season, reaching their peak of abundance in May (Bates, 1945). That phenological increase in mosquito abundance coincides with the arrival and increase in abundance of these aerial insectivorous migratory songbirds in the area (Figure 2B–G).

Ephemeral river islands vary from year to year depending on the intensity of the rainy season. Moreover, islands likely vary in number and size along different parts of the river. Factors such as water currents, types of sediments, and the presence of tributaries may influence the formation and persistence of these islands. Aiming to understand how islands are distributed along the Meta River, we first used satellite images, derived from Google Earth (Images © 2013–2014 Maxar Technologies, CNES/Airbus, Airbus and Landsat/Copernicus), to estimate the reach of the river, starting from the mouth of the Metica River to the mouth of the Meta River where it meets with the Orinoco River (Figure 3A). Then, we divided the river into transects of 100 km in length and we estimated the sizes of islands using the polygon function in Google Earth (Figure 3A). We found that there were hundreds of islands spread along the Meta River at the time when the satellite images were taken, ranging in size from about 5 to 18,000 ha with mean size of about 160 ha (Figure 3A). We also found that the number of islands and their total size slightly increased downstream toward the east (Figure 3C,D).

Ephemeral river islands are constantly undergoing successional dynamics, providing a unique and arguably stable niche for transient communities of migratory songbirds to exploit during the nonbreeding period. We hypothesize that pioneer riparian vegetation associated with ephemeral substrate, such as T. integrifolia, provides an important habitat for insectivorous migratory songbirds in South America. In fact, Alder Flycatchers (Empidonax alnorum) have also been observed defending territories in T. integrifolia in the wintering grounds in Argentina (Areta et al., 2016). The diversity in island size in the Meta River provides a favorable system to study the relationship between island ephemerality, river geomorphology, and migratory songbird habitat preference. Island size likely influences island persistence, the abundance of pioneer vegetation in the area, and potentially avian use.

Moreover, the ephemeral dynamics of island emergence coinciding with the arrival of migratory songbirds and an increase in insect abundance also sets the stage for the formation of transient ecological communities that appear every year. Attributes related to whether these islands are connected to the mainland, their size, and age (if they survived the previous rainy seasons), potentially influence the presence of predators such as large mammals and snakes, and the probability of migratory songbirds establishing a roosting site there. For example, on the rivers of Manú National Park in Peru, year-round resident bird species that nest on islands disconnected from the mainland experience lower nest predation rates than those that nest on the mainland (Ocampo & Londoño, 2015). Colonial birds in the family Icteridae in equatorial latitudes also prefer river islands for breeding as they are protected from predatory mammals and snakes (Robinson, 1985). We believe that roosting migratory songbirds likely minimize predation risk by using riverine islands, a hypothesis that remains to be explicitly tested.

Similar dynamics of ephemeral island phenology have been documented for the Amazon basin, where these systems have promoted the evolution of a unique nonmigratory avifauna specialized in utilizing and dispersing among these dynamic islands (Johnson et al., 2023; Luna et al., 2022; Remsen & Parker, 1983). Moreover, these “resident” bird species in ephemeral islands in the Amazon basin have been noted to occur in densities an order of magnitude higher than those found in communities on the mainland (Remsen & Parker, 1983). Our observations suggest high densities of migratory songbirds occupying ephemeral river islands in the Meta River in comparison to the mainland.

The Orinoco Plains and the Amazon are adjacent regions, and while they share some avian species, they also differ, largely because the Orinoco has extensive areas of grasslands surrounded by riparian forest, while the Amazon is largely forested. Although these two regions have similar phenological dynamics of precipitation (e.g., Silva et al., 2021), habitat differences influence the type of resources available and thus the species that inhabit those areas. Indeed, the migratory species that we reported in the Meta River prefer to forage over grasslands or in riparian habitats when on their nonbreeding grounds. In contrast, seasonally flooded islands in the Brazilian Amazon have been found to be important roosting sites for the Purple Martin (Progne subis; a species not observed in Orocue) (Fraser et al., 2017; Santos et al., 2021), with one island on the Rio Negro hosting over 250,000 roosting individuals between February and April (Grossman, 2022).

During expeditions to the Meta River's ephemeral islands, we also confirmed migratory and nonmigratory Fork-tailed Flycatchers, identified based on characteristics in Pyle (1997). Some populations, like Tyrannus savana monachus in eastern Colombia, are nonmigratory, while T. s. savana is an Austral-Neotropical migratory group. eBird data for Casanare show year-round presence peaking during migration and the rainy season (Figure 3B,C). Occasionally, nonmigratory individuals with juvenile characteristics joined migratory flocks, but adults were mostly in savannas away from the river suggesting segregation in roost site use. Barn Swallows also exhibit intra-population co-occurrence in April, with boreal and austral breeding populations likely coexisting in eastern Colombia as boreal migrants return northward and austral migrants depart for equatorial latitudes (Winkler et al., 2017).

Speciation in birds appears to happen most commonly through an initial stage of geographic isolation that leads to evolutionary changes resulting in reproductive isolation, followed by range expansion which occasionally leads to secondary contact and further differentiation (Price, 2008). However, Fork-tailed Flycatchers and Barn Swallows are diverging with populations co-occurring geographically during part of the year providing potential overlap for breeding to occur. This highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms leading to switches in migratory behavior and those that govern the timing of other life history events such as reproduction and molting.

In summary, we found that thousands of migratory songbirds that breed in the northern and southern hemispheres co-occur in high densities on ephemeral river islands of the Meta River. Additionally, we found that island flood dynamics are synchronized with the boreal (spring) and austral (fall) migrations. How this ecological association evolved, how tight it is, and the spatial–temporal dynamics remain to be tested. Moreover, how migratory songbirds find and select the islands on which they will roost is an intriguing question given that each year the geomorphology of the river changes. Do they select islands that have fewer ground predators, for example? What are the consequences, both positive and negative, of inter and intraspecies co-occurrence on the individuals and populations using the islands (e.g., competition for resources, disease transmission, speciation)? How dependent are they on the resources that these islands provide at the population and species level? What is the relative importance of these islands compared with other habitats on the landscape given ongoing landscape change? Finally, given the decline of North American migratory aerial insectivorous and other birds (Spiller & Dettmers, 2019), should protecting ephemeral islands of the Meta River be a conservation priority? We suggest that conservation measures covering the thousands of hectares of islands likely require a more holistic view of the Meta River—and other rivers like it—with their dynamic phenology and geomorphology.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短暂的河岛是北方和南半球迁徙鸣禽的栖息和觅食场所
候鸟在繁殖地和非繁殖地之间迁徙时,全年会使用不同的栖息地。那些在温带地区繁殖的候鸟在迁徙过程中,有一半以上的时间会在其它地方、在休息和补充能量的中途站以及在遥远的非繁殖地度过(牛顿,2007 年)。因此,研究迁徙物种的非繁殖生态是了解其整个年周期需求的关键。然而,在许多情况下,人们对非繁殖地的生境使用和质量并不了解,尤其是对长途迁徙者而言。在这里,我们记录了哥伦比亚东部梅塔河(Meta River)中的短暂河流岛屿作为多种近北欧-新热带迁徙鸣禽(即在北半球繁殖的鸟类)和南半球-新热带迁徙鸟类(即在南半球繁殖的鸟类)栖息地的作用、梅塔河中的短暂岛屿在雨季高峰期(5 月底至 9 月)大多被淹没,雨季结束后随着水位下降而出现,并持续整个旱季,直到下一个雨季到来(10 月至 5 月初)(图 1)。这些岛屿出现后,草类和一种快速生长的先驱灌木(Tessaria integrifolia,菊科)迅速定殖和生长,高度可达 3 米,形成茂密的灌丛(Remsen &amp; Parker, 1983)。正是在这种植被中,我们发现了成千上万只栖息的候鸟。通过随后对社区科学数据库(eBird;沙利文等人,2009 年)中记录的探索,我们了解到岛屿出现和随后植被生长的物候与哥伦比亚卡萨纳雷省迁徙鸣禽的出现和丰度高峰期相吻合(图 2)。作为一个群体,北美迁徙鸣禽正急剧减少(罗森伯格等人,2019 年)。作为我们团队正在开发的一个大型项目的一部分,该项目旨在探索哥伦比亚东部迁徙鸣禽在中途停留或占据固定非繁殖区时面临的潜在威胁,我们的目标是描述用于觅食和栖息的栖息地,最初的重点是迁徙燕(燕科)。2022 年 4 月和 2023 年 3-4 月期间,我们以卡萨纳雷的奥罗库(Orocue)河畔小镇为中心进行了观察。我们全天在草地和河流附近观察和跟踪大群燕子(如稗燕,Hirundo rustica),发现大群燕子在黄昏时聚集在梅塔河上空觅食飞虫,然后飞往未知的栖息地。为了找到栖息地的确切位置,我们观察了鸟类的飞行路线,并推测了它们可能的目的地。随后,我们检查了其中一个面积约为 30 公顷的岛屿,发现其上覆盖着大量鸟类粪便,这表明该岛屿可能是鸟类的栖息地。然后,我们在植被边缘等待黄昏,并记录了成千上万只不同种类的候鸟从天而降,进入岛上植被的过程。我们根据实地标记和专家推断相结合的方法识别鸟类的种类,并估算出降落在我们所站区域的每种鸟类的数量。我们还记录了鸟类在黎明时离开同一栖息地的情况(附录 S1:图 S1 和 S2 以及视频 S1 和 S2)。我们的观察结果表明,成千上万的澳-新热带和近北-新热带候鸟鸣禽至少在四月份的几个星期里共同栖息在这些昙花一现的岛屿上,这与北半球春季迁徙和南半球秋季迁徙的时间相吻合(如图1)。我们在栖息地观察到了数千只谷仓燕和叉尾飞燕(Tyrannus savana),以及数百只岸燕(Riparia riparia)。我们还在同样的蜉蝣岛屿上记录到数千只雏燕(Spiza americana),但它们是在高草区觅食。最后,我们还观察到数十只黄莺(Setophaga petechia)和北方水鸟(Parkesia noveboracensis)全天都在T. integrifolia中觅食昆虫,并在黄昏时与其他迁徙物种一起栖息。虽然我们观察到崖燕(Petrochelidon pyrrhonota)在奥罗库附近的稀树草原上觅食,但我们没有在岛上的栖息地记录到该物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Nitrogen fixation may not alleviate stoichiometric imbalances that limit primary production in eutrophic lake ecosystems Assessing the seasonality of foliar nutrient concentrations in woody plants Root microbes can improve plant tolerance to insect damage: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Food availability has direct and delayed effects on structural growth and body reserves in garter snakes The year of a leaf: Tracking the fate of leaf litter and its nutrients during aquatic decomposition and consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1