Satisfaction Survey of Medical Staff for Telemedicine after the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison Between the COVID-Pandemic and Post-COVID Pandemic Periods.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0142
Seung Eun Jung, Young-Mi Kwon, Soon-Yong Kwon, Young-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Youl Park
{"title":"Satisfaction Survey of Medical Staff for Telemedicine after the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison Between the COVID-Pandemic and Post-COVID Pandemic Periods.","authors":"Seung Eun Jung, Young-Mi Kwon, Soon-Yong Kwon, Young-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Youl Park","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: The role of telemedicine should be reassessed in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. This study aimed to evaluate the perception and satisfaction of medical staff with telemedicine after the COVID-19 pandemic and compare these findings with those during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> Between January and February 2023, a questionnaire regarding the utilization, safety, and satisfaction with telemedicine was administered to 200 medical staff members (100 doctors and 100 nurses). Additionally, open-ended questions were included to gather insights on the strengths, weaknesses, and prerequisites of telemedicine. The satisfaction levels of the medical staff were compared with those from a previous study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Results:</b> The response rate among medical staff was 60.0% (50 doctors and 70 nurses). Concerning patient safety, 83.3% of respondents indicated a risk of worsening symptoms in chronic patients, and 68.3% expressed concerns about emergencies related to patient safety. Eighty-two percent of doctors preferred in-person visits over telemedicine, while 48.6% of nurses reported equal or greater satisfaction with telemedicine (<i>p</i> = 0.003). The reported strengths of telemedicine included the convenience of outpatient clinics (67%), while its primary weakness was the incomplete assessment of patient conditions (73%). The likelihood of partial substitution of telemedicine for in-person visits was significantly higher in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period compared to during the pandemic (71.7% vs. 49.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> In the post-COVID-19 pandemic era, telemedicine continues to offer significant benefits in enhancing patient access to medical care. However, medical staff remain concerned about its safety and show lower satisfaction compared to in-person visits. In response to these concerns, an effective telemedicine platform and legal standards, including practical guidelines, should be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of telemedicine should be reassessed in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. This study aimed to evaluate the perception and satisfaction of medical staff with telemedicine after the COVID-19 pandemic and compare these findings with those during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Between January and February 2023, a questionnaire regarding the utilization, safety, and satisfaction with telemedicine was administered to 200 medical staff members (100 doctors and 100 nurses). Additionally, open-ended questions were included to gather insights on the strengths, weaknesses, and prerequisites of telemedicine. The satisfaction levels of the medical staff were compared with those from a previous study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The response rate among medical staff was 60.0% (50 doctors and 70 nurses). Concerning patient safety, 83.3% of respondents indicated a risk of worsening symptoms in chronic patients, and 68.3% expressed concerns about emergencies related to patient safety. Eighty-two percent of doctors preferred in-person visits over telemedicine, while 48.6% of nurses reported equal or greater satisfaction with telemedicine (p = 0.003). The reported strengths of telemedicine included the convenience of outpatient clinics (67%), while its primary weakness was the incomplete assessment of patient conditions (73%). The likelihood of partial substitution of telemedicine for in-person visits was significantly higher in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period compared to during the pandemic (71.7% vs. 49.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In the post-COVID-19 pandemic era, telemedicine continues to offer significant benefits in enhancing patient access to medical care. However, medical staff remain concerned about its safety and show lower satisfaction compared to in-person visits. In response to these concerns, an effective telemedicine platform and legal standards, including practical guidelines, should be developed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行后医务人员对远程医疗的满意度调查:COVID 大流行期间与后 COVID 大流行期间的比较。
导言:在后 COVID-19 大流行时代,应重新评估远程医疗的作用。本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行后医务人员对远程医疗的看法和满意度,并将这些结果与 COVID-19 大流行期间的结果进行比较。研究方法在 2023 年 1 月至 2 月期间,对 200 名医务人员(100 名医生和 100 名护士)进行了有关远程医疗的使用情况、安全性和满意度的问卷调查。此外,问卷还包括开放式问题,以收集关于远程医疗的优势、劣势和先决条件的见解。医务人员的满意度与之前在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的一项研究的满意度进行了比较。结果显示医务人员的回复率为 60.0%(50 名医生和 70 名护士)。在患者安全方面,83.3%的受访者表示慢性病患者有症状恶化的风险,68.3%的受访者对与患者安全相关的紧急情况表示担忧。与远程医疗相比,82% 的医生更倾向于亲自就诊,而 48.6% 的护士对远程医疗表示出同等或更高的满意度(p = 0.003)。据报告,远程医疗的优点包括门诊的便利性(67%),而其主要缺点是对患者病情的评估不全面(73%)。与大流行期间相比(71.7% 对 49.0%,P < 0.001),COVID-19 大流行后期间部分使用远程医疗替代亲诊的可能性明显更高。结论:在后 COVID-19 大流行时代,远程医疗在提高患者获得医疗服务的机会方面仍具有显著优势。然而,医务人员仍对其安全性表示担忧,与亲临现场就诊相比,其满意度较低。针对这些问题,应制定有效的远程医疗平台和法律标准,包括实用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Receiving Telemedicine Care in Vietnam. The Association Between Telehealth Use During Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Acceptability of Forensic Sexual Assault Telehealth Consultation. Taking a Step Back or a Step Forward. Tele-Critical Care, Severity of Illness, and 30-Day Mortality Risk: A Retrospective, Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1