A shared journey: evaluating a patient-assessed measure of self-management of chronic conditions in an Australian setting.

Phillip Davis, Joanne Bradbury, Kirstine Shrubsole, John Parke
{"title":"A shared journey: evaluating a patient-assessed measure of self-management of chronic conditions in an Australian setting.","authors":"Phillip Davis, Joanne Bradbury, Kirstine Shrubsole, John Parke","doi":"10.1071/PY24003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Patient Assessment of Care in Chronic Conditions (PACIC+), included in some Australian guidelines, has been shown reliable for measuring patient engagement and perception of their care in primary care settings. Various studies have focussed on PACIC+ use in specific conditions. This study aims to expand PACIC+ to measure patient empowerment to self-manage their chronic condition and validate it in the broader Australian primary care population. This study aims to evaluate internal consistency and reliability of PACIC+ and six new supplementary items proposed to assess patient wellbeing and empowerment to self-manage their chronic condition. Methods A repeated-measures correlation design study assessed the expanded PACIC+ over three time-points. Particpants were patients with at least one chronic disease, referred by consultant physician, or recruited by advertisement posters in hospital clinic areas. Results PACIC+ (26-item) had acceptable internal consitency (Cronbach's alpha 0.96). Test-retest reliability (Time-1 and 2, P r (48)=0.43; and New supplementary items: Confidence r (48)=0.54; Understanding r (48)=0.62; Support r (48)=0.43; Overall Health r (48)=0.42; Overall Health Change r (48)=-0.31, P =0.03; and Acute Episodes of Care in 1-month r (48)=0.42, P Conclusions The expanded PACIC+ is an improved psychometric tool providing for the patient's voice in a shared health journey. It is a valid, reliable tool to monitor and measure self-management of chronic conditions in Australian population clinic and primary healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Patient Assessment of Care in Chronic Conditions (PACIC+), included in some Australian guidelines, has been shown reliable for measuring patient engagement and perception of their care in primary care settings. Various studies have focussed on PACIC+ use in specific conditions. This study aims to expand PACIC+ to measure patient empowerment to self-manage their chronic condition and validate it in the broader Australian primary care population. This study aims to evaluate internal consistency and reliability of PACIC+ and six new supplementary items proposed to assess patient wellbeing and empowerment to self-manage their chronic condition. Methods A repeated-measures correlation design study assessed the expanded PACIC+ over three time-points. Particpants were patients with at least one chronic disease, referred by consultant physician, or recruited by advertisement posters in hospital clinic areas. Results PACIC+ (26-item) had acceptable internal consitency (Cronbach's alpha 0.96). Test-retest reliability (Time-1 and 2, P r (48)=0.43; and New supplementary items: Confidence r (48)=0.54; Understanding r (48)=0.62; Support r (48)=0.43; Overall Health r (48)=0.42; Overall Health Change r (48)=-0.31, P =0.03; and Acute Episodes of Care in 1-month r (48)=0.42, P Conclusions The expanded PACIC+ is an improved psychometric tool providing for the patient's voice in a shared health journey. It is a valid, reliable tool to monitor and measure self-management of chronic conditions in Australian population clinic and primary healthcare settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同的旅程:在澳大利亚环境中评估由患者评估的慢性病自我管理措施。
背景 病人对慢性病护理的评估(PACIC+)已被纳入澳大利亚的一些指南中,它在衡量病人在初级医疗机构中的参与度和对护理的感知方面被证明是可靠的。多项研究重点关注 PACIC+ 在特定病症中的应用。本研究旨在扩展 PACIC+,以衡量患者自我管理慢性病的能力,并在更广泛的澳大利亚初级保健人群中进行验证。本研究旨在评估 PACIC+ 和六个新补充项目的内部一致性和可靠性,这六个新补充项目旨在评估患者的健康状况和自我管理慢性疾病的能力。方法 一项重复测量相关设计研究评估了三个时间点的扩展 PACIC+。参与者为至少患有一种慢性疾病的患者,由主治医生推荐,或通过医院门诊区的广告海报招募。结果 PACIC+(26 个项目)具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha 0.96)。重测可靠性(时间-1 和时间-2,P r (48)=0.43; 新补充项目:信心 r (48)=0.54;理解 r (48)=0.62;支持 r (48)=0.43;整体健康 r (48)=0.42;整体健康变化 r (48)=-0.31,P =0.03;以及 1 个月内急性护理发作 r (48)=0.42,P 结论 扩展后的 PACIC+ 是一种改进的心理测量工具,在共同的健康历程中提供了患者的声音。它是一种有效、可靠的工具,可用于监测和测量澳大利亚人口诊所和初级医疗机构中慢性病患者的自我管理情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Views of nurses and midwives working in primary healthcare services on intimate partner violence against women. The perspectives of people living with dementia and their carers on the role of the general practice nurse in dementia care provision: a qualitative study. Providing a localised cervical cancer screening course for general practice nurses. Primary healthcare providers' knowledge, practices and beliefs relating to preventive sexual and reproductive health care for women from refugee and asylum-seeking backgrounds in Australia: a national cross-sectional survey. Codesigning a Community Health Navigator program to assist patients to transition from hospital to community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1