"Flux in the Belly:" A History of Infantile Gastroenteritis.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1159/000540886
Michael Obladen
{"title":"\"Flux in the Belly:\" A History of Infantile Gastroenteritis.","authors":"Michael Obladen","doi":"10.1159/000540886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although a major cause of infant mortality for centuries, little research was done on the causes of infants' diarrhea. Artificial feeding, teething, and summer heat were believed to cause the severe disease that spared breastfed infants.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Since antiquity, infants' digestive disorders were termed dyspepsia, flux of the belly, diarrhea, gastroenteritis, watery gripes, the runs, dysentery, or cholera, without definitions. Alois Bednar discerned 3 grades (dyspepsia, diarrhea, and cholera) of the same disease. Infants' neurologic symptoms were interpreted as alimentary toxicosis. Chronic diarrhea caused emaciation and dehydration. In 1950, Laurence Finberg found diarrhea with hypernatremia causing cerebral damage. Seasonal influence was known since Hippocrates. Baudelocque recommended obtaining infant milk fresh from the cow because it decomposes in the summer heat. In the cities, summer diarrhea caused a third of total infant mortality. Physicians debated whether heat acted directly on the infant or spoiled the food. The discovery of microorganisms in the 1860s revolutionized medical understanding. However, influential researchers such as Adalbert Czerny classified nutritional disturbances by assumed pathogenesis (\"ex alimentation, ex infection, ex constitution\"), but denied the possibility of bacterial infection via milk. Heating baby food, practiced for centuries, was introduced in Denmark, Sweden, and France, whereas in Britain and Germany, professional and public debate on pasteurization persisted.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>It took half a century to implement effective hygienic measures once the bacterial origin became known. Foodborne infection was rejected, and the prejudice that raw milk possesses essential \"living\" properties, adopted by influential scientists, contributed to delaying pasteurization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although a major cause of infant mortality for centuries, little research was done on the causes of infants' diarrhea. Artificial feeding, teething, and summer heat were believed to cause the severe disease that spared breastfed infants.

Summary: Since antiquity, infants' digestive disorders were termed dyspepsia, flux of the belly, diarrhea, gastroenteritis, watery gripes, the runs, dysentery, or cholera, without definitions. Alois Bednar discerned 3 grades (dyspepsia, diarrhea, and cholera) of the same disease. Infants' neurologic symptoms were interpreted as alimentary toxicosis. Chronic diarrhea caused emaciation and dehydration. In 1950, Laurence Finberg found diarrhea with hypernatremia causing cerebral damage. Seasonal influence was known since Hippocrates. Baudelocque recommended obtaining infant milk fresh from the cow because it decomposes in the summer heat. In the cities, summer diarrhea caused a third of total infant mortality. Physicians debated whether heat acted directly on the infant or spoiled the food. The discovery of microorganisms in the 1860s revolutionized medical understanding. However, influential researchers such as Adalbert Czerny classified nutritional disturbances by assumed pathogenesis ("ex alimentation, ex infection, ex constitution"), but denied the possibility of bacterial infection via milk. Heating baby food, practiced for centuries, was introduced in Denmark, Sweden, and France, whereas in Britain and Germany, professional and public debate on pasteurization persisted.

Key messages: It took half a century to implement effective hygienic measures once the bacterial origin became known. Foodborne infection was rejected, and the prejudice that raw milk possesses essential "living" properties, adopted by influential scientists, contributed to delaying pasteurization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肚子里的流动:"婴儿肠胃炎史"。
背景:几个世纪以来,婴儿腹泻一直是导致婴儿死亡的主要原因,但人们对婴儿腹泻的原因研究甚少。摘要:自古以来,婴儿的消化系统疾病被称为消化不良、腹胀、腹泻、肠胃炎、水样腹泻、腹泻、痢疾或霍乱,但没有明确的定义。阿洛伊斯-贝德纳(Alois Bednar)将同一种疾病分为三个等级(消化不良、腹泻和霍乱)。婴儿的神经症状被解释为食物中毒。慢性腹泻会导致消瘦和脱水。1950 年,劳伦斯-芬伯格(Laurence Finberg)发现腹泻和高钠血症会造成脑损伤。自希波克拉底以来,人们就知道季节的影响。Baudelocque 建议婴儿饮用新鲜的牛奶,因为牛奶在夏季高温下会分解。在城市中,夏季腹泻造成的婴儿死亡人数占总死亡人数的三分之一。医生们争论不休,究竟是高温直接作用于婴儿,还是食物变质。19 世纪 60 年代,微生物的发现彻底改变了医学认识。然而,阿达尔伯特-切尔尼(Adalbert Czerny)等颇具影响力的研究人员根据假定的致病机理("食物、感染、体质")对营养紊乱进行了分类,但否认了细菌通过牛奶感染的可能性。在丹麦、瑞典和法国,加热婴儿食品的做法已经实行了几个世纪,而在英国和德国,专业人士和公众对巴氏杀菌法的争论仍在继续:关键信息:当人们知道细菌的来源后,用了半个世纪的时间才实施了有效的卫生措施。人们拒绝接受食源性感染,有影响力的科学家认为生牛奶具有重要的 "生命 "特性,这种偏见导致巴氏杀菌法迟迟不能实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review. Post-Asphyxial Aftercare and Management of Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis. Immediate Care for Common Conditions in Term and Preterm Neonates: The Evidence. Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1