Katrin Heck, Nils Werner, Lea Hoffmann, Falk Schwendicke, Friederike Litzenburger
{"title":"In vitro early proximal caries detection using trilateral short-wave infrared reflection at 1050 and 1550 nm.","authors":"Katrin Heck, Nils Werner, Lea Hoffmann, Falk Schwendicke, Friederike Litzenburger","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This in vitro study evaluated the diagnostic potential of short-wave infrared reflection (SWIRR) at 1050 and 1550 nm for proximal caries detection from the occlusal, buccal and lingual surfaces of posterior teeth under clinically relevant conditions. Bitewing radiography (BWR) was the alternative index test and micro-computed tomography (μCT) the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>250 proximal surfaces of extracted human teeth were examined using SWIRR at 1050 and 1550 nm and BWR. SWIRR, BWR and μCT findings were evaluated twice by two trained examiners. SWIRR images were evaluated from occlusal and trilateral (occlusal, buccal and lingual combined) views. Sensitivity, specificity and AUC were calculated. Reliability assessment was performed using κ statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SWIRR (1050 nm) showed sensitivity of 0.44 for occlusal and 0.55 for trilateral assessment, paired with specificity of 0.96 and 0.90, whereas SWIRR (1550 nm) showed sensitivity of 0.73 and 0.85 paired with specificity of 0.76 and 0.59. Compared to occlusal view, trilateral SWIRR view revealed ≈10% higher sensitivity and lower specificity. BWR revealed lowest sensitivity (0.30) and highest specificity (0.99). Over-and underestimation of caries demonstrated opposite trends: from 1050-1550 nm, overestimation of trilateral SWIRR increased (0.08-0.29), while underestimation decreased (0.15-0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trilateral SWIRR has higher sensitivity and lower specificity for proximal caries, than occlusal SWIRR. 1050 nm are more suitable for trilateral SWIRR and 1550 nm for occlusal examinations. A combination of SWIRR at 1050 and 1550 nm may exhibit a balanced sensitivity and specificity for proximal caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This in vitro study evaluated the diagnostic potential of short-wave infrared reflection (SWIRR) at 1050 and 1550 nm for proximal caries detection from the occlusal, buccal and lingual surfaces of posterior teeth under clinically relevant conditions. Bitewing radiography (BWR) was the alternative index test and micro-computed tomography (μCT) the reference standard.
Methods: 250 proximal surfaces of extracted human teeth were examined using SWIRR at 1050 and 1550 nm and BWR. SWIRR, BWR and μCT findings were evaluated twice by two trained examiners. SWIRR images were evaluated from occlusal and trilateral (occlusal, buccal and lingual combined) views. Sensitivity, specificity and AUC were calculated. Reliability assessment was performed using κ statistics.
Results: SWIRR (1050 nm) showed sensitivity of 0.44 for occlusal and 0.55 for trilateral assessment, paired with specificity of 0.96 and 0.90, whereas SWIRR (1550 nm) showed sensitivity of 0.73 and 0.85 paired with specificity of 0.76 and 0.59. Compared to occlusal view, trilateral SWIRR view revealed ≈10% higher sensitivity and lower specificity. BWR revealed lowest sensitivity (0.30) and highest specificity (0.99). Over-and underestimation of caries demonstrated opposite trends: from 1050-1550 nm, overestimation of trilateral SWIRR increased (0.08-0.29), while underestimation decreased (0.15-0.06).
Conclusion: Trilateral SWIRR has higher sensitivity and lower specificity for proximal caries, than occlusal SWIRR. 1050 nm are more suitable for trilateral SWIRR and 1550 nm for occlusal examinations. A combination of SWIRR at 1050 and 1550 nm may exhibit a balanced sensitivity and specificity for proximal caries.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X