Feasibility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08652-x
Akihisa Ohno, Nao Fujimori, Toyoma Kaku, Yuzo Shimokawa, Tsukasa Miyagahara, Yuta Suehiro, Anthony Gerodias, Shotaro Kakehashi, Kazuhide Matsumoto, Masatoshi Murakami, Keijiro Ueda, Yoshihiro Ogawa
{"title":"Feasibility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction.","authors":"Akihisa Ohno, Nao Fujimori, Toyoma Kaku, Yuzo Shimokawa, Tsukasa Miyagahara, Yuta Suehiro, Anthony Gerodias, Shotaro Kakehashi, Kazuhide Matsumoto, Masatoshi Murakami, Keijiro Ueda, Yoshihiro Ogawa","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08652-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Almost all previous reports on endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) involve malignant distal bile duct strictures. However, the feasibility of EUS-HGS for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-HGS for MHBO and identify the risk factors associated with technical failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, we reviewed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2017 and March 2023 at five institutions. We assessed the overall feasibility and efficacy of EUS-HGS for MHBO, including the factors associated with technical failure, using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 85 patients were enrolled (mean age, 72 years; 36.4% female). Thirty-six patients (42.3%) had surgically altered anatomy, and 43 (50.6%) underwent biliary stenting by transpapillary or percutaneous biliary drainage before EUS-HGS. The rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events were 87.0% (74/85), 76.4% (65/85), and 11.8% (10/85), respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that a bile duct diameter ≤ 4 mm was the only independent risk factor for technical failure (odds ratio, 6.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-36.6; P = 0.047). The most common reason for technical failure was cholangiography failure (45.4%), followed by inappropriate guidewire position (36.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-HGS is a challenging but promising treatment option for MHBO. Patients with a bile duct diameter ≤ 4 mm or inappropriate guidewire position should be careful as these factors can lead to the technical failure of EUS-HGS for MHBO.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"419-428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08652-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Almost all previous reports on endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) involve malignant distal bile duct strictures. However, the feasibility of EUS-HGS for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) remains unclear.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-HGS for MHBO and identify the risk factors associated with technical failure.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we reviewed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2017 and March 2023 at five institutions. We assessed the overall feasibility and efficacy of EUS-HGS for MHBO, including the factors associated with technical failure, using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 85 patients were enrolled (mean age, 72 years; 36.4% female). Thirty-six patients (42.3%) had surgically altered anatomy, and 43 (50.6%) underwent biliary stenting by transpapillary or percutaneous biliary drainage before EUS-HGS. The rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events were 87.0% (74/85), 76.4% (65/85), and 11.8% (10/85), respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that a bile duct diameter ≤ 4 mm was the only independent risk factor for technical failure (odds ratio, 6.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-36.6; P = 0.047). The most common reason for technical failure was cholangiography failure (45.4%), followed by inappropriate guidewire position (36.4%).

Conclusions: EUS-HGS is a challenging but promising treatment option for MHBO. Patients with a bile duct diameter ≤ 4 mm or inappropriate guidewire position should be careful as these factors can lead to the technical failure of EUS-HGS for MHBO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜超声引导肝胃造口术治疗恶性肝胆管阻塞的可行性。
背景:以往关于内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术(EUS-HGS)的报道几乎都涉及恶性远端胆管狭窄。目的:本研究旨在评估 EUS-HGS 治疗恶性肝胆管梗阻(MHBO)的有效性和安全性,并确定与技术失败相关的风险因素:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,我们回顾了 2017 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在五家机构接受 EUS-HGS 的连续患者。我们采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估了 EUS-HGS 治疗 MHBO 的总体可行性和疗效,包括与技术失败相关的因素:共有 85 名患者入选(平均年龄 72 岁;36.4% 为女性)。36名患者(42.3%)的解剖结构经过手术改变,43名患者(50.6%)在 EUS-HGS 之前通过经胆道或经皮胆道引流术进行了胆道支架植入术。技术成功率、临床成功率和不良事件发生率分别为 87.0%(74/85)、76.4%(65/85)和 11.8%(10/85)。多变量分析表明,胆管直径≤4 毫米是技术失败的唯一独立风险因素(几率比,6.12;95% 置信区间,1.02-36.6;P = 0.047)。技术失败最常见的原因是胆管造影失败(45.4%),其次是导丝位置不当(36.4%):结论:EUS-HGS 是治疗 MHBO 的一种具有挑战性但前景广阔的方法。胆管直径小于 4 毫米或导丝位置不当的患者应谨慎,因为这些因素可能导致 EUS-HGS 治疗 MHBO 的技术失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Ethics Consultations in Cirrhosis Care. A Residual Laterally Spreading Tumor that Regressed After Chemotherapy Following Surgical Resection of Sigmoid Cancer. Are Non-invasive Multi-cancer Early Cancer Detection Tests the Future? Cholangioscope-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy in the Management of Chronic Abdominal Pain Related to the Appendix: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients with Self-Expanding Metal Stents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1