Disparities in access to fertility preservation among adolescents undergoing gonadotoxic therapies.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s10815-024-03253-z
Hana G Murphy, Erin Isaacson, Molly B Moravek, Erin Ellman, Sarah D Compton, Monica W Rosen
{"title":"Disparities in access to fertility preservation among adolescents undergoing gonadotoxic therapies.","authors":"Hana G Murphy, Erin Isaacson, Molly B Moravek, Erin Ellman, Sarah D Compton, Monica W Rosen","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03253-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fertility preservation (FP) for adolescents prior to potentially gonadotoxic therapies is not accessible for all patients. Current literature acknowledges multiple barriers to FP, but research surrounding disparities for accessing these services is limited. We aimed to identify inequities in receiving FP services among adolescents undergoing gonadotoxic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed at a single academic medical center for patients aged 0-21 referred for FP counseling prior to gonadotoxic therapy. Exclusions included referral after treatment, prior to gender-affirming therapy, or for fertility discussion due to a genetic condition. Minority patients were defined as non-White race and/or Hispanic ethnicity. Non-minority patients were defined as White, non-Hispanic. Analyses to assess differences in receiving FP based on minority identity and insurance status were performed via logistic regression, with receiving desired care as the outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 136 patients-38 minority and 98 non-minority. Forty-six (33.8%) patients had Medicaid, which did not differ between minority and non-minority (42.1% vs. 38.8%, P = .73). Most patients (83.1%) had a cancer diagnosis. Similar proportions of minority and non-minority patients had gonadotoxic treatment starting urgently (52.6% vs. 55.1%, P = .80), while more minority than non-minority patients desired FP (89.5% vs .77.5%, P = .10). When controlling for insurance type and age, minority participants were 12.8% less likely to receive desired FP (marginal effect =  - .128, P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified significant inequities for minority populations in accessing FP. Further research is needed to determine how to make FP services more accessible to all patients, regardless of minority status.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03253-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Fertility preservation (FP) for adolescents prior to potentially gonadotoxic therapies is not accessible for all patients. Current literature acknowledges multiple barriers to FP, but research surrounding disparities for accessing these services is limited. We aimed to identify inequities in receiving FP services among adolescents undergoing gonadotoxic therapy.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at a single academic medical center for patients aged 0-21 referred for FP counseling prior to gonadotoxic therapy. Exclusions included referral after treatment, prior to gender-affirming therapy, or for fertility discussion due to a genetic condition. Minority patients were defined as non-White race and/or Hispanic ethnicity. Non-minority patients were defined as White, non-Hispanic. Analyses to assess differences in receiving FP based on minority identity and insurance status were performed via logistic regression, with receiving desired care as the outcome variable.

Results: Our cohort included 136 patients-38 minority and 98 non-minority. Forty-six (33.8%) patients had Medicaid, which did not differ between minority and non-minority (42.1% vs. 38.8%, P = .73). Most patients (83.1%) had a cancer diagnosis. Similar proportions of minority and non-minority patients had gonadotoxic treatment starting urgently (52.6% vs. 55.1%, P = .80), while more minority than non-minority patients desired FP (89.5% vs .77.5%, P = .10). When controlling for insurance type and age, minority participants were 12.8% less likely to receive desired FP (marginal effect =  - .128, P = .05).

Conclusions: This study identified significant inequities for minority populations in accessing FP. Further research is needed to determine how to make FP services more accessible to all patients, regardless of minority status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受性腺毒性治疗的青少年在获得生育力保存方面的差异。
目的:并非所有患者都能在接受潜在的性腺毒性治疗前保留青少年的生育能力(FP)。目前的文献承认FP存在多种障碍,但有关获得这些服务的差异的研究却很有限。我们旨在确定接受性腺毒性疗法的青少年在接受 FP 服务方面存在的不平等现象:方法:我们在一家学术医疗中心对接受性腺毒物治疗前转诊接受计划生育咨询服务的 0-21 岁患者进行了回顾性病历审查。不包括治疗后转诊、性别确认治疗前转诊或因遗传病而进行生育讨论的患者。少数族裔患者的定义是非白人种族和/或西班牙裔。非少数民族患者指非西班牙裔白人。通过逻辑回归分析评估了基于少数族裔身份和保险状况的接受 FP 的差异,并将接受期望的护理作为结果变量:我们的队列包括 136 名患者--38 名少数民族患者和 98 名非少数民族患者。46名患者(33.8%)拥有医疗补助,少数民族和非少数民族之间没有差异(42.1% vs. 38.8%,P = .73)。大多数患者(83.1%)被诊断出患有癌症。少数族裔和非少数族裔患者紧急开始性腺毒物治疗的比例相似(52.6% vs. 55.1%,P = .80),而希望接受 FP 的少数族裔患者多于非少数族裔患者(89.5% vs. 77.5%,P = .10)。在控制保险类型和年龄的情况下,少数族裔参与者接受所需的 FP 的可能性要低 12.8%(边际效应 = - .128,P = .05):本研究发现,少数群体在获得 FP 方面存在严重的不平等。需要开展进一步研究,以确定如何使所有患者(无论其是否为少数民族)更容易获得 FP 服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
National-level assessment of gestational carrier pregnancies in the United States. Assessing the impact of calcium ionophore on pregnancy outcomes in artificial oocyte activation cycles: a 10-year update of systematic review and meta-analysis. From live birth to live birth: a strong correlation between the outcomes of first and second frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfers from sibling oocytes. The new ice age: the promise and challenges of rapid oocyte warming protocols. Dual trigger versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger for blastocyst quality and cumulative live birth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1