National-level assessment of gestational carrier pregnancies in the United States.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1007/s10815-024-03320-5
Aaron D Masjedi, Rachel S Mandelbaum, Katherine V Erickson, Zachary S Anderson, Shinya Matsuzaki, Joseph G Ouzounian, Koji Matsuo, Richard J Paulson
{"title":"National-level assessment of gestational carrier pregnancies in the United States.","authors":"Aaron D Masjedi, Rachel S Mandelbaum, Katherine V Erickson, Zachary S Anderson, Shinya Matsuzaki, Joseph G Ouzounian, Koji Matsuo, Richard J Paulson","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03320-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess national trends, characteristics, and delivery outcomes associated with gestational carriers (GC) pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 14,312,619 deliveries between 2017 and 2020. Obstetric characteristics and outcomes associated with GC pregnancies were assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1965 GCs (13.7 per 100,000) included for national estimates. The prevalence rate of GC pregnancies increased by 55.0% over a 4-year period from 11.8 to 18.2 per 100,000 deliveries (P-trend < .001). In the weighted model, GCs were more likely to have a multiple gestation pregnancy (14.7% vs 1.8%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.54-9.38, P < .001), placental abruption (3.5% vs 1.1%, aOR 2.98, 95%CI 2.12-4.19), and low-lying placenta (1.6% vs 0.2%, aOR 5.14, 95%CI 3.10-8.52). Among singleton delivery, odds of late-preterm (10.8% vs 6.4%, aOR 1.79, 95%CI 1.44-2.23) and periviable (1.1% vs 0.4%, aOR 2.54, 95%CI 1.32-4.89) deliveries and postpartum hemorrhage (12.2% vs 4.1%, aOR 3.27, 95%CI 2.67-4.00) were increased for GC compared to non-GCs whereas odds of cesarean delivery (23.6% vs 31.6%, aOR 0.59, 95%CI 0.51-0.69) were decreased. These associations were less robust in multi-fetal gestations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the current nationwide assessment suggest that GC pregnancies are rare but gradually increasing in the United States. This study shows that GC pregnancies have usually favorable pre-pregnancy patient characteristics compared to non-GC pregnancies, with mixed obstetric outcomes including increased odds of preterm delivery, placental abnormalities, and postpartum hemorrhage and decreased odds of cesarean delivery in singleton pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03320-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess national trends, characteristics, and delivery outcomes associated with gestational carriers (GC) pregnancies.

Methods: This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 14,312,619 deliveries between 2017 and 2020. Obstetric characteristics and outcomes associated with GC pregnancies were assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score.

Results: There were 1965 GCs (13.7 per 100,000) included for national estimates. The prevalence rate of GC pregnancies increased by 55.0% over a 4-year period from 11.8 to 18.2 per 100,000 deliveries (P-trend < .001). In the weighted model, GCs were more likely to have a multiple gestation pregnancy (14.7% vs 1.8%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.54-9.38, P < .001), placental abruption (3.5% vs 1.1%, aOR 2.98, 95%CI 2.12-4.19), and low-lying placenta (1.6% vs 0.2%, aOR 5.14, 95%CI 3.10-8.52). Among singleton delivery, odds of late-preterm (10.8% vs 6.4%, aOR 1.79, 95%CI 1.44-2.23) and periviable (1.1% vs 0.4%, aOR 2.54, 95%CI 1.32-4.89) deliveries and postpartum hemorrhage (12.2% vs 4.1%, aOR 3.27, 95%CI 2.67-4.00) were increased for GC compared to non-GCs whereas odds of cesarean delivery (23.6% vs 31.6%, aOR 0.59, 95%CI 0.51-0.69) were decreased. These associations were less robust in multi-fetal gestations.

Conclusion: The results of the current nationwide assessment suggest that GC pregnancies are rare but gradually increasing in the United States. This study shows that GC pregnancies have usually favorable pre-pregnancy patient characteristics compared to non-GC pregnancies, with mixed obstetric outcomes including increased odds of preterm delivery, placental abnormalities, and postpartum hemorrhage and decreased odds of cesarean delivery in singleton pregnancies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国对妊娠携带者怀孕情况的国家级评估。
目的:评估与妊娠带原者(GC)妊娠相关的全国趋势、特征和分娩结果:这项横断面研究查询了医疗成本与利用项目的全国住院病人样本。研究对象为 2017 年至 2020 年间的 14,312,619 例分娩。采用逆概率治疗加权倾向评分评估了与GC妊娠相关的产科特征和结局:全国估计共纳入 1965 例 GC(每 10 万人中有 13.7 例)。在 4 年的时间里,GC 孕妇的患病率增加了 55.0%,从每 10 万次分娩中有 11.8 例增加到 18.2 例(P-趋势结论):目前的全国性评估结果表明,GC 妊娠在美国很少见,但在逐渐增加。这项研究表明,与非 GC 妊娠相比,GC 妊娠的孕前患者特征通常较好,但产科结果不一,包括早产、胎盘异常和产后出血的几率增加,而单胎妊娠剖宫产的几率降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
National-level assessment of gestational carrier pregnancies in the United States. Assessing the impact of calcium ionophore on pregnancy outcomes in artificial oocyte activation cycles: a 10-year update of systematic review and meta-analysis. From live birth to live birth: a strong correlation between the outcomes of first and second frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfers from sibling oocytes. The new ice age: the promise and challenges of rapid oocyte warming protocols. Dual trigger versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger for blastocyst quality and cumulative live birth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1