Michael Rosario , Jingyuan Zhang , Muhammad Irfan Kaleem , Nikhil Chandra , Ying Yan , Daniel Moran , Matthew Wood , Wilson Z. Ray , Matthew MacEwan
{"title":"A method for quantitative spatial analysis of immunolabeled fibers at regenerative electrode interfaces","authors":"Michael Rosario , Jingyuan Zhang , Muhammad Irfan Kaleem , Nikhil Chandra , Ying Yan , Daniel Moran , Matthew Wood , Wilson Z. Ray , Matthew MacEwan","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Regenerative electrodes are being explored as robust peripheral nerve interfaces for neuro-prosthetic control and sensory feedback. Current designs differ in electrode number, spatial arrangement, and porosity which impacts the regeneration, activation, and spatial distribution of fibers at the device interface. Knowledge of sensory and motor fiber distributions are important in optimizing selective fiber activation and recording.</div></div><div><h3>New Method</h3><div>We use confocal microscopy and immunofluorescence methods to conduct spatial analysis of immunolabeled fibers across whole nerve cross sections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This protocol was implemented to characterize motor fiber distribution within 3 macro-sieve electrode regenerated (MSE), 3 silicone-conduit regenerated, and 3 unmanipulated control rodent sciatic nerves. Total motor fiber counts were 1485 [SD: +/- 50.11], 1899 [SD: +/- 359], and 5732 [SD: +/- 1410] for control, MSE, and conduit nerves respectively. MSE motor fiber distributions exhibited evidence of deviation from complete spatial randomness and evidence of dispersion and clustering tendencies at varying scales. Notably, MSE motor fibers exhibited clustering within the central portion of the cross section, whereas conduit regenerated motor fibers exhibited clustering along the periphery.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with Existing Methods</h3><div>Prior exploration of fiber distributions at regenerative interfaces was limited to either quadrant-based density analysis of randomly sampled subregions or qualitative description. This method extends existing sample preparation and microscopy techniques to quantitatively assess immunolabeled fiber distributions within whole nerve cross-sections.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This approach is an effective way to examine the spatial organization of fiber subsets at regenerative electrode interfaces, enabling robust assessment of fiber distributions relative to electrode arrangement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024002401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Regenerative electrodes are being explored as robust peripheral nerve interfaces for neuro-prosthetic control and sensory feedback. Current designs differ in electrode number, spatial arrangement, and porosity which impacts the regeneration, activation, and spatial distribution of fibers at the device interface. Knowledge of sensory and motor fiber distributions are important in optimizing selective fiber activation and recording.
New Method
We use confocal microscopy and immunofluorescence methods to conduct spatial analysis of immunolabeled fibers across whole nerve cross sections.
Results
This protocol was implemented to characterize motor fiber distribution within 3 macro-sieve electrode regenerated (MSE), 3 silicone-conduit regenerated, and 3 unmanipulated control rodent sciatic nerves. Total motor fiber counts were 1485 [SD: +/- 50.11], 1899 [SD: +/- 359], and 5732 [SD: +/- 1410] for control, MSE, and conduit nerves respectively. MSE motor fiber distributions exhibited evidence of deviation from complete spatial randomness and evidence of dispersion and clustering tendencies at varying scales. Notably, MSE motor fibers exhibited clustering within the central portion of the cross section, whereas conduit regenerated motor fibers exhibited clustering along the periphery.
Comparison with Existing Methods
Prior exploration of fiber distributions at regenerative interfaces was limited to either quadrant-based density analysis of randomly sampled subregions or qualitative description. This method extends existing sample preparation and microscopy techniques to quantitatively assess immunolabeled fiber distributions within whole nerve cross-sections.
Conclusions
This approach is an effective way to examine the spatial organization of fiber subsets at regenerative electrode interfaces, enabling robust assessment of fiber distributions relative to electrode arrangement.