Enhancing fMRI quality control.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110337
Lennard van den Berg, Nick Ramsey, Mathijs Raemaekers
{"title":"Enhancing fMRI quality control.","authors":"Lennard van den Berg, Nick Ramsey, Mathijs Raemaekers","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>fMRI in clinical settings faces challenges affecting activity maps. Template matching can screen for abnormal results by providing an objective metric of activity map quality. This research tests how sample size, age, or gender-specific templates, and unilateral templates affect template matching results.</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>We used an fMRI database of 76 healthy subjects performing 7 tasks assessing motor, language, and working memory functions. Templates were created with varying numbers of subjects, genders, and ages. Individual subjects were compared to templates using leave-one-out cross validation. We also compared unilateral and bilateral templates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing sample size improved template matches, with diminishing returns for larger sample sizes. Gender and age-specific templates increased correlations for some tasks, with age having a larger effect than gender. Generally, templates including all subjects provided the highest correlations, indicating that age and gender effects did not outweigh the benefits of larger sample sizes. Unilateral templates of the task-dominant hemisphere increased template correlations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age and gender affect templates, but the benefits depend on the database size. When the database is large enough, age and gender effects are beneficial. Unilateral templates enhance template matching, but practical benefits depend on the severity of neurological abnormalities in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: fMRI in clinical settings faces challenges affecting activity maps. Template matching can screen for abnormal results by providing an objective metric of activity map quality. This research tests how sample size, age, or gender-specific templates, and unilateral templates affect template matching results.

New method: We used an fMRI database of 76 healthy subjects performing 7 tasks assessing motor, language, and working memory functions. Templates were created with varying numbers of subjects, genders, and ages. Individual subjects were compared to templates using leave-one-out cross validation. We also compared unilateral and bilateral templates.

Results: Increasing sample size improved template matches, with diminishing returns for larger sample sizes. Gender and age-specific templates increased correlations for some tasks, with age having a larger effect than gender. Generally, templates including all subjects provided the highest correlations, indicating that age and gender effects did not outweigh the benefits of larger sample sizes. Unilateral templates of the task-dominant hemisphere increased template correlations.

Conclusions: Age and gender affect templates, but the benefits depend on the database size. When the database is large enough, age and gender effects are beneficial. Unilateral templates enhance template matching, but practical benefits depend on the severity of neurological abnormalities in patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强功能磁共振成像质量控制。
背景:fMRI在临床环境中面临影响活动图的挑战。模板匹配可以通过提供活动图质量的客观度量来筛选异常结果。本研究测试样本量、年龄或性别特定模板和单边模板如何影响模板匹配结果。新方法:我们使用76名健康受试者执行7项任务的fMRI数据库,评估运动、语言和工作记忆功能。模板是由不同数量的主题、性别和年龄创建的。使用留一交叉验证将个体受试者与模板进行比较。我们还比较了单侧和双侧模板。结果:增加样本量可改善模板匹配,样本量越大回报越小。性别和年龄特定的模板增加了某些任务的相关性,年龄的影响大于性别。一般来说,包含所有受试者的模板提供了最高的相关性,这表明年龄和性别的影响不会超过更大样本量的好处。任务主导半球的单侧模板增加了模板相关性。结论:年龄和性别影响模板,但收益取决于数据库大小。当数据库足够大时,年龄和性别的影响是有益的。单侧模板增强模板匹配,但实际效益取决于患者神经异常的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
期刊最新文献
Electrode configurations for sensitive and specific detection of compound muscle action potentials to the tibialis anterior muscle after peroneal nerve injury in rats. Enhancing fMRI quality control. Multi-layer transfer learning algorithm based on improved common spatial pattern for brain-computer interfaces. Fractal analysis to assess the differentiation state of oligodendroglia in culture. STSimM: A new tool for evaluating neuron model performance and detecting spike trains similarity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1