Risk early warning for unmanned aerial vehicle operators' unsafe acts: A prediction model using Human Factors Analysis and Classification System and random forest.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1111/risa.17655
Qin Xiao, Yapeng Li, Fan Luo
{"title":"Risk early warning for unmanned aerial vehicle operators' unsafe acts: A prediction model using Human Factors Analysis and Classification System and random forest.","authors":"Qin Xiao, Yapeng Li, Fan Luo","doi":"10.1111/risa.17655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prediction of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operators' unsafe acts is critical for preventing UAV incidents. However, there is a lack of research specifically focusing on UAV operators' unsafe acts, and existing approaches in related areas often lack precision and effectiveness. To address this, we propose a hybrid approach that combines the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) with random forest (RF) to predict and warn against UAV operators' unsafe acts. Initially, we introduce an improved HFACS framework to identify risk factors influencing the unsafe acts. Subsequently, we utilize the adaptive synthetic sampling algorithm (ADASYN) to rectify the imbalance in the dataset. The RF model is then used to construct a risk prediction and early warning model, as well as to identify critical risk factors associated with the unsafe acts. The results obtained through the improved HFACS framework reveal 33 risk factors, encompassing environmental influences, industry influences, unsafe supervision, and operators' states, contributing to the unsafe acts. The RF model demonstrates a significant improvement in prediction performance after applying ADASYN. The critical risk factors associated with the unsafe acts are identified as weak safety awareness, allowing unauthorized flight activities, lack of legal awareness, lack of supervision system, and obstacles. The findings of this study can assist policymakers in formulating effective measures to mitigate incidents resulting from UAV operators' unsafe acts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prediction of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operators' unsafe acts is critical for preventing UAV incidents. However, there is a lack of research specifically focusing on UAV operators' unsafe acts, and existing approaches in related areas often lack precision and effectiveness. To address this, we propose a hybrid approach that combines the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) with random forest (RF) to predict and warn against UAV operators' unsafe acts. Initially, we introduce an improved HFACS framework to identify risk factors influencing the unsafe acts. Subsequently, we utilize the adaptive synthetic sampling algorithm (ADASYN) to rectify the imbalance in the dataset. The RF model is then used to construct a risk prediction and early warning model, as well as to identify critical risk factors associated with the unsafe acts. The results obtained through the improved HFACS framework reveal 33 risk factors, encompassing environmental influences, industry influences, unsafe supervision, and operators' states, contributing to the unsafe acts. The RF model demonstrates a significant improvement in prediction performance after applying ADASYN. The critical risk factors associated with the unsafe acts are identified as weak safety awareness, allowing unauthorized flight activities, lack of legal awareness, lack of supervision system, and obstacles. The findings of this study can assist policymakers in formulating effective measures to mitigate incidents resulting from UAV operators' unsafe acts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无人机操作员不安全行为的风险预警:使用人为因素分析与分类系统和随机森林的预测模型。
预测无人机(UAV)操作员的不安全行为对于预防无人机事故至关重要。然而,目前缺乏专门针对无人机操作员不安全行为的研究,相关领域的现有方法往往缺乏精确性和有效性。为此,我们提出了一种混合方法,将人为因素分析和分类系统(HFACS)与随机森林(RF)相结合,对无人机操作员的不安全行为进行预测和预警。首先,我们引入了改进的 HFACS 框架,以识别影响不安全行为的风险因素。随后,我们利用自适应合成采样算法(ADASYN)来纠正数据集中的不平衡。然后利用 RF 模型构建风险预测和预警模型,并识别与不安全行为相关的关键风险因素。通过改进的 HFACS 框架得出的结果显示,导致不安全行为的风险因素有 33 个,包括环境影响、行业影响、不安全监督和操作员状态。应用 ADASYN 后,射频模型的预测性能有了显著提高。与不安全行为相关的关键风险因素包括安全意识薄弱、允许未经许可的飞行活动、缺乏法律意识、缺乏监管制度和障碍。本研究的结果可帮助决策者制定有效措施,减少无人机操作员不安全行为导致的事故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
期刊最新文献
Benchmark dose modeling for epidemiological dose-response assessment using case-control studies. The lasting effect of the Romantic view of nature: How it influences perceptions of risk and the support of symbolic actions against climate change. The exposure of nonhuman living organisms to mobile communication emissions: A survey to establish European stakeholders' policy option preferences. Research gaps and priorities for quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). Pairwise summation as a method for the additive combination of probabilities in qualitative risk assessments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1