Impact of a Structured Roadmap, Individual Accountability and Support, and Outcome Measurement on the Culture of Scholarship in a Residency Program.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23821205241287449
Abdul Waheed, Erum Azhar, Faisal Aziz, Munima Nasir, Muhammad Ali Chaudhary, Li Wang
{"title":"Impact of a Structured Roadmap, Individual Accountability and Support, and Outcome Measurement on the Culture of Scholarship in a Residency Program.","authors":"Abdul Waheed, Erum Azhar, Faisal Aziz, Munima Nasir, Muhammad Ali Chaudhary, Li Wang","doi":"10.1177/23821205241287449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite scholarly activity being an accreditation requirement for residency programs by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) since 2006, many family medicine programs have struggled to meet this requirement. A myriad of approaches and curricula have been proposed to enhance the scholarly output of residency programs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the impact of a multimodal curricular intervention consisting of clear expectations, structured roadmap, availability of resources, and standardized accountability on the scholarly activity of residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a quasi-experimental study with a retrospective data collection. The scholarly activities of residents completing training in the pre-intervention (2009-2012) and post-intervention period (2013-2017) were compared. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann Whitney U, and Kruskal Wallis H tests were utilized to detect differences between the pre- and post-intervention groups. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to detect independent predictors of per-resident scholarly activity. The institutional review board determined that the study was exempt from full review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 residents, 20 (30%) pre-intervention and 47 (70%) post-intervention, were included in the analysis. The number of total scholarly activities per resident increased significantly in the post-intervention period after adjusting for confounding factors (1.9 vs 6.4). The number of scholarly activities per resident also showed an increasing trend over time (<i>P</i> = .04). Moreover, traditional scholarship, including published manuscripts (0.35 vs 2.43) and national-level presentations (0.35 vs 1.27) also increased in the post-intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing this comprehensive curriculum increased the scholarly output of residents and helped enrich the scholarship culture in the residency program.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241287449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241287449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite scholarly activity being an accreditation requirement for residency programs by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) since 2006, many family medicine programs have struggled to meet this requirement. A myriad of approaches and curricula have been proposed to enhance the scholarly output of residency programs.

Objectives: To determine the impact of a multimodal curricular intervention consisting of clear expectations, structured roadmap, availability of resources, and standardized accountability on the scholarly activity of residents.

Methods: This is a quasi-experimental study with a retrospective data collection. The scholarly activities of residents completing training in the pre-intervention (2009-2012) and post-intervention period (2013-2017) were compared. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann Whitney U, and Kruskal Wallis H tests were utilized to detect differences between the pre- and post-intervention groups. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to detect independent predictors of per-resident scholarly activity. The institutional review board determined that the study was exempt from full review.

Results: A total of 67 residents, 20 (30%) pre-intervention and 47 (70%) post-intervention, were included in the analysis. The number of total scholarly activities per resident increased significantly in the post-intervention period after adjusting for confounding factors (1.9 vs 6.4). The number of scholarly activities per resident also showed an increasing trend over time (P = .04). Moreover, traditional scholarship, including published manuscripts (0.35 vs 2.43) and national-level presentations (0.35 vs 1.27) also increased in the post-intervention period.

Conclusion: Implementing this comprehensive curriculum increased the scholarly output of residents and helped enrich the scholarship culture in the residency program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构化路线图、个人责任与支持以及成果衡量对住院医师项目学术文化的影响。
背景:尽管自 2006 年以来,学术活动已成为毕业后医学教育认证委员会 (ACGME) 对住院医师培训项目的一项认证要求,但许多全科医学培训项目仍难以达到这一要求。为了提高住院医师培训项目的学术成果,人们提出了许多方法和课程:目的:确定由明确期望、结构化路线图、资源可用性和标准化问责制组成的多模式课程干预对住院医师学术活动的影响:这是一项回顾性数据收集的准实验研究。比较了干预前(2009-2012 年)和干预后(2013-2017 年)完成培训的住院医师的学术活动。利用卡方检验(Chi-square)、费雪精确检验(Fisher's exact)、曼-惠特尼U检验(Mann Whitney U)和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯H检验(Kruskal Wallis H)来检测干预前和干预后两组之间的差异。多变量泊松回归模型用于检测人均学术活动的独立预测因素。机构审查委员会决定该研究免于全面审查:共有 67 名住院医师参与了分析,其中 20 人(30%)为干预前住院医师,47 人(70%)为干预后住院医师。经调整干扰因素后,干预后每位住院医师的总学术活动次数明显增加(1.9 对 6.4)。随着时间的推移,每位住院医师的学术活动次数也呈上升趋势(P = .04)。此外,包括发表手稿(0.35 vs 2.43)和国家级演讲(0.35 vs 1.27)在内的传统学术活动在干预后也有所增加:综合课程的实施提高了住院医师的学术成果,有助于丰富住院医师项目的学术文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Engagement in Extracurricular Activities During Medical School: A Cross-Sectional Study on Student Motivations and Challenges. The State of Academic Bullying Among Medical Students in Tanzania: Prevalence, Forms and Associated Factors. A Cross-Sectional Study. Student Critical Self-Reflection and Perceptions of Video-Based Pro-Section Computer-Assisted Instruction. Does Medical Education Require Radical Change? The Role of Information Visualisation and Anecdotal Evidence in Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1