Carbon dioxide evaporation heat transfer coefficient prediction in porous media using Machine learning algorithms based on experimental data

IF 5.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Thermal Science and Engineering Progress Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102929
{"title":"Carbon dioxide evaporation heat transfer coefficient prediction in porous media using Machine learning algorithms based on experimental data","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prediction of the internal heat transfer coefficient during evaporation is vital for vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles. Accurate measurements and understanding of CO<sub>2</sub> heat transfer in porous evaporators are essential for optimal system design across various operating conditions. This study utilizes a reference dataset derived from previous experiments that investigated the impact of porous evaporators on CO<sub>2</sub>′s internal heat transfer coefficient under sub-critical conditions, employing gravel sand as the porous medium. The dataset encompasses key factors: gravel sand porosities ranging from 39.8 % to 44.5 %, evaporator inlet pressures between 3700 and 4300 kPa, CO<sub>2</sub> mass flow rates from 10.7x10<sup>-5</sup>–18x10<sup>-5</sup>kg.s<sup>−1</sup>, and porous tube effective diameters spanning 1.53 x10<sup>-3</sup> <!-->–3.4x10<sup>-3</sup> <!-->m. Employing three machine learning techniques (SVM, GPR, OBEM), the study predicts the internal heat transfer coefficient using regression models. The models’ predictions are analyzed and compared to expected values for validation, evaluating their performance using four statistical criteria. Results indicate SVM, GPR, and OBEM models achieved RMSEs of 1.5471, 1.8212, and 3.6978, respectively, while MAE errors were 1.1479, 1.2418, and 2.9787, respectively. Comparison with the dimensional analysis method reveals the effectiveness of the proposed models in accurately predicting internal heat transfer coefficients. The models exhibit low uncertainty and maintain prediction quality on an extended dataset without overfitting concerns. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights for designing heat exchangers and systems in vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245190492400547X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prediction of the internal heat transfer coefficient during evaporation is vital for vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles. Accurate measurements and understanding of CO2 heat transfer in porous evaporators are essential for optimal system design across various operating conditions. This study utilizes a reference dataset derived from previous experiments that investigated the impact of porous evaporators on CO2′s internal heat transfer coefficient under sub-critical conditions, employing gravel sand as the porous medium. The dataset encompasses key factors: gravel sand porosities ranging from 39.8 % to 44.5 %, evaporator inlet pressures between 3700 and 4300 kPa, CO2 mass flow rates from 10.7x10-5–18x10-5kg.s−1, and porous tube effective diameters spanning 1.53 x10-3 –3.4x10-3 m. Employing three machine learning techniques (SVM, GPR, OBEM), the study predicts the internal heat transfer coefficient using regression models. The models’ predictions are analyzed and compared to expected values for validation, evaluating their performance using four statistical criteria. Results indicate SVM, GPR, and OBEM models achieved RMSEs of 1.5471, 1.8212, and 3.6978, respectively, while MAE errors were 1.1479, 1.2418, and 2.9787, respectively. Comparison with the dimensional analysis method reveals the effectiveness of the proposed models in accurately predicting internal heat transfer coefficients. The models exhibit low uncertainty and maintain prediction quality on an extended dataset without overfitting concerns. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights for designing heat exchangers and systems in vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于实验数据的机器学习算法预测多孔介质中的二氧化碳蒸发传热系数
预测蒸发过程中的内部传热系数对于蒸汽压缩制冷和闭环动力循环至关重要。精确测量和了解多孔蒸发器中的二氧化碳传热情况对于在各种运行条件下优化系统设计至关重要。本研究使用了一个参考数据集,该数据集来自以前的实验,这些实验采用砾石砂作为多孔介质,研究了亚临界状态下多孔蒸发器对二氧化碳内部传热系数的影响。数据集包含以下关键因素:砾石砂孔隙率在 39.8 % 到 44.5 % 之间,蒸发器入口压力在 3700 到 4300 kPa 之间,二氧化碳质量流量在 10.7x10-5-18x10-5kg.s-1 之间,多孔管有效直径在 1.53 x10-3.4x10-3 m 之间。对模型的预测结果进行分析,并与预期值进行比较验证,使用四种统计标准评估其性能。结果表明,SVM、GPR 和 OBEM 模型的 RMSE 分别为 1.5471、1.8212 和 3.6978,而 MAE 误差分别为 1.1479、1.2418 和 2.9787。与尺寸分析方法的比较显示,所提出的模型在准确预测内部传热系数方面非常有效。模型显示出较低的不确定性,并在扩展数据集上保持了预测质量,没有过拟合问题。总之,这项研究为设计蒸汽压缩制冷和闭环动力循环中的热交换器和系统提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
327
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.
期刊最新文献
Profiles of peripheral regulatory T cells forecasts the feasibility of steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation based on cellular thermal modeling Energy-economic analysis and optimization of a shell and tube heat exchanger using a multi-objective heat transfer search algorithm Study on the acoustic disturbance characteristics of the spray flame Investigation of laminar flow and heat transfer performance of Gallium alloy based nanofluids in minichannel heat sink A reconfigurable architecture for maximizing energy harvesting of thermoelectric generators in non-stationary conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1