{"title":"Carbon dioxide evaporation heat transfer coefficient prediction in porous media using Machine learning algorithms based on experimental data","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prediction of the internal heat transfer coefficient during evaporation is vital for vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles. Accurate measurements and understanding of CO<sub>2</sub> heat transfer in porous evaporators are essential for optimal system design across various operating conditions. This study utilizes a reference dataset derived from previous experiments that investigated the impact of porous evaporators on CO<sub>2</sub>′s internal heat transfer coefficient under sub-critical conditions, employing gravel sand as the porous medium. The dataset encompasses key factors: gravel sand porosities ranging from 39.8 % to 44.5 %, evaporator inlet pressures between 3700 and 4300 kPa, CO<sub>2</sub> mass flow rates from 10.7x10<sup>-5</sup>–18x10<sup>-5</sup>kg.s<sup>−1</sup>, and porous tube effective diameters spanning 1.53 x10<sup>-3</sup> <!-->–3.4x10<sup>-3</sup> <!-->m. Employing three machine learning techniques (SVM, GPR, OBEM), the study predicts the internal heat transfer coefficient using regression models. The models’ predictions are analyzed and compared to expected values for validation, evaluating their performance using four statistical criteria. Results indicate SVM, GPR, and OBEM models achieved RMSEs of 1.5471, 1.8212, and 3.6978, respectively, while MAE errors were 1.1479, 1.2418, and 2.9787, respectively. Comparison with the dimensional analysis method reveals the effectiveness of the proposed models in accurately predicting internal heat transfer coefficients. The models exhibit low uncertainty and maintain prediction quality on an extended dataset without overfitting concerns. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights for designing heat exchangers and systems in vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245190492400547X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The prediction of the internal heat transfer coefficient during evaporation is vital for vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles. Accurate measurements and understanding of CO2 heat transfer in porous evaporators are essential for optimal system design across various operating conditions. This study utilizes a reference dataset derived from previous experiments that investigated the impact of porous evaporators on CO2′s internal heat transfer coefficient under sub-critical conditions, employing gravel sand as the porous medium. The dataset encompasses key factors: gravel sand porosities ranging from 39.8 % to 44.5 %, evaporator inlet pressures between 3700 and 4300 kPa, CO2 mass flow rates from 10.7x10-5–18x10-5kg.s−1, and porous tube effective diameters spanning 1.53 x10-3 –3.4x10-3 m. Employing three machine learning techniques (SVM, GPR, OBEM), the study predicts the internal heat transfer coefficient using regression models. The models’ predictions are analyzed and compared to expected values for validation, evaluating their performance using four statistical criteria. Results indicate SVM, GPR, and OBEM models achieved RMSEs of 1.5471, 1.8212, and 3.6978, respectively, while MAE errors were 1.1479, 1.2418, and 2.9787, respectively. Comparison with the dimensional analysis method reveals the effectiveness of the proposed models in accurately predicting internal heat transfer coefficients. The models exhibit low uncertainty and maintain prediction quality on an extended dataset without overfitting concerns. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights for designing heat exchangers and systems in vapor-compression refrigeration and closed-loop power cycles.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.