{"title":"Developing a digital mapping of soil organic carbon on a national scale using Sentinel-2 and hybrid models at varying spatial resolutions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mapping the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) is crucial for monitoring soil health, understanding ecosystem functions, and contributing to global carbon cycling. However, few studies have directly compared the influence of hybrid models and individual models with varying spatial resolutions on SOC prediction at a national scale. In this study, by combining remote sensing data, we utilized the LUCAS 2018 soil dataset to evaluate the potential capacities of hybrid models for predicting SOC content at different spatial resolutions in Germany. The hybrid models PLSRK and RFK consisted of partial least square regression (PLSR) with residual original kriging (OK) models, and random forest (RF) models with residual OK models, respectively. Individual PLSR and RF models were used as reference models. All these models were applied to estimate SOC content at 10 m, 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m spatial resolutions. Sentinel-2 bands, band indices, and topography variables were as predictors. The results revealed that hybrid models had a more accurate prediction of SOC content with higher explanations and lower prediction errors compared with individual models. The RFK model at the spatial resolution of 100 m was the fittest model with <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> = 0.416, RMSE = 0.545, and RPIQ = 1.647, which enhanced 3.74% of explanation compared with the performance of RF model. The results also showed that hybrid models at a relatively coarse resolution (100 m) had better accuracy instead of those at high spatial resolution (10 m, 50 m). Sentinel-2 remote sensing data showed significant predictive capabilities for estimating SOC content. The predicted spatial distribution of SOC content revealed that the high SOC concentrated in the northwest grassland, central and southwestern mountains, and the Alps in Germany. Our study provided a benchmark SOC map in Germany for monitoring the changes resulting from land use and climate impacts, and we illustrated the accuracy of hybrid models and the effects of spatial resolutions on SOC predictions at a national scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24011117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mapping the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) is crucial for monitoring soil health, understanding ecosystem functions, and contributing to global carbon cycling. However, few studies have directly compared the influence of hybrid models and individual models with varying spatial resolutions on SOC prediction at a national scale. In this study, by combining remote sensing data, we utilized the LUCAS 2018 soil dataset to evaluate the potential capacities of hybrid models for predicting SOC content at different spatial resolutions in Germany. The hybrid models PLSRK and RFK consisted of partial least square regression (PLSR) with residual original kriging (OK) models, and random forest (RF) models with residual OK models, respectively. Individual PLSR and RF models were used as reference models. All these models were applied to estimate SOC content at 10 m, 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m spatial resolutions. Sentinel-2 bands, band indices, and topography variables were as predictors. The results revealed that hybrid models had a more accurate prediction of SOC content with higher explanations and lower prediction errors compared with individual models. The RFK model at the spatial resolution of 100 m was the fittest model with = 0.416, RMSE = 0.545, and RPIQ = 1.647, which enhanced 3.74% of explanation compared with the performance of RF model. The results also showed that hybrid models at a relatively coarse resolution (100 m) had better accuracy instead of those at high spatial resolution (10 m, 50 m). Sentinel-2 remote sensing data showed significant predictive capabilities for estimating SOC content. The predicted spatial distribution of SOC content revealed that the high SOC concentrated in the northwest grassland, central and southwestern mountains, and the Alps in Germany. Our study provided a benchmark SOC map in Germany for monitoring the changes resulting from land use and climate impacts, and we illustrated the accuracy of hybrid models and the effects of spatial resolutions on SOC predictions at a national scale.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.