Time of Brain Imaging In Patients With An Acute Traumatic Intracranial Haemorrhage

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae178.070
Christine Condon, Colin Mason, Luke Phillips, Vinny Ramiah, John Duddy, Paolo Rizzo, Sorcha Burns
{"title":"Time of Brain Imaging In Patients With An Acute Traumatic Intracranial Haemorrhage","authors":"Christine Condon, Colin Mason, Luke Phillips, Vinny Ramiah, John Duddy, Paolo Rizzo, Sorcha Burns","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae178.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background We observed variation in timing of CT brain imaging in patients presenting with a history of trauma. The objective of this audit was to determine adherence to local ED CT Head Criteria in patients with a confirmed traumatic ICH. Methods Retrospective point prevalence audit of patients with a confirmed intracranial haemorrhage over a five-month period using our neurotrauma work-stream data. Exploration of CT timing between Criteria A (within 60 minutes) and Criteria B (within 8 hours). Characteristics reviewed included Gender, Age, Time of presentation to ED, Day of Arrival, GCS on presentation, Mechanism of Injury and Time of CT completion. Results 68 patients over the five-month period had a confirmed ICH: 48 male, 20 female. The median age was 62 years (range 17-97). Falls of less than 2 metres were the most frequent cause of injury (n=44, 65%), with 60% of these occurring in patients aged over 65 years of age. 67% (n=31) of patients meeting Criteria A did not have a CT Brain completed within 60 minutes. 14% (n=3) of patients meeting Criteria B did not have a CT Brain completed within 8 hours. Of patients meeting criteria who did not have a timely CT, 11 patients presented out of hours. Patients aged less than 65 years of age were less likely to meet target CT timing; 71% (n=24). Conclusion This audit highlights that only 33% of patients meeting Criteria A had brain imaging within one hour. Older adults were more likely to meet target CT timing than younger adults. Lack of ED access to radiology out of hours was deemed to be the main barrier to meeting target CT timing. We are working alongside our radiology department to secure no discussion trauma CT scans in ED out of hours. We plan to re-audit following the implementation of this change.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae178.070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background We observed variation in timing of CT brain imaging in patients presenting with a history of trauma. The objective of this audit was to determine adherence to local ED CT Head Criteria in patients with a confirmed traumatic ICH. Methods Retrospective point prevalence audit of patients with a confirmed intracranial haemorrhage over a five-month period using our neurotrauma work-stream data. Exploration of CT timing between Criteria A (within 60 minutes) and Criteria B (within 8 hours). Characteristics reviewed included Gender, Age, Time of presentation to ED, Day of Arrival, GCS on presentation, Mechanism of Injury and Time of CT completion. Results 68 patients over the five-month period had a confirmed ICH: 48 male, 20 female. The median age was 62 years (range 17-97). Falls of less than 2 metres were the most frequent cause of injury (n=44, 65%), with 60% of these occurring in patients aged over 65 years of age. 67% (n=31) of patients meeting Criteria A did not have a CT Brain completed within 60 minutes. 14% (n=3) of patients meeting Criteria B did not have a CT Brain completed within 8 hours. Of patients meeting criteria who did not have a timely CT, 11 patients presented out of hours. Patients aged less than 65 years of age were less likely to meet target CT timing; 71% (n=24). Conclusion This audit highlights that only 33% of patients meeting Criteria A had brain imaging within one hour. Older adults were more likely to meet target CT timing than younger adults. Lack of ED access to radiology out of hours was deemed to be the main barrier to meeting target CT timing. We are working alongside our radiology department to secure no discussion trauma CT scans in ED out of hours. We plan to re-audit following the implementation of this change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性外伤性颅内出血患者的脑成像时间
背景 我们观察到,有外伤史的患者进行 CT 脑成像的时间存在差异。本次审核旨在确定确诊外伤性 ICH 患者是否遵守当地急诊室 CT 头部标准。方法 利用我们的神经创伤工作流数据,对五个月内确诊颅内出血的患者进行回顾性点流行率审计。探讨标准 A(60 分钟内)和标准 B(8 小时内)之间的 CT 时间。审查的特征包括性别、年龄、急诊室就诊时间、到达当天、就诊时的 GCS、受伤机制和 CT 完成时间。结果 5 个月内有 68 名患者确诊为 ICH:48 名男性,20 名女性。中位年龄为 62 岁(17-97 岁不等)。最常见的受伤原因是小于 2 米的跌倒(44 人,占 65%),其中 60% 的患者年龄超过 65 岁。67%(31 人)符合标准 A 的患者未在 60 分钟内完成脑 CT 检查。14%(n=3)符合标准 B 的患者未在 8 小时内完成脑 CT 检查。在符合标准但未及时完成 CT 的患者中,有 11 名患者在非工作时间就诊。年龄小于 65 岁的患者达到目标 CT 时间的可能性较低;为 71% (n=24)。结论 本次审核结果表明,只有 33% 符合标准 A 的患者在一小时内接受了脑成像检查。老年人比年轻人更有可能达到目标 CT 时间。在非工作时间,急诊室无法获得放射科的服务被认为是达到目标 CT 时间的主要障碍。我们正在与放射科部门合作,确保急诊室在非工作时间不进行讨论性外伤 CT 扫描。我们计划在实施这一变革后重新进行审核。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Mild behavioural impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review Association of night shift work and biological ageing: the mediating role of body mass index. New horizons in hospital-associated deconditioning: a global condition of body and mind. Reimagining and rebranding advance care planning “Research happens a lot in other settings—so why not here?” A qualitative interview study of stakeholders’ views about advance planning for care home residents’ research participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1