Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1186/s41077-024-00314-2
Michael Daly, Claire Mulhall, James O'Neill, Walter Eppich, Jonathan Shpigelman, Caitriona Cahir, Daniel Fraughen, Enda McElduff, Catherine Uhomoibhi, Claire Condron
{"title":"Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial.","authors":"Michael Daly, Claire Mulhall, James O'Neill, Walter Eppich, Jonathan Shpigelman, Caitriona Cahir, Daniel Fraughen, Enda McElduff, Catherine Uhomoibhi, Claire Condron","doi":"10.1186/s41077-024-00314-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of comprehensive consultations in medicine, i.e. a complete history, physical examination, and differential diagnosis, is regarded as authentic tests of clinical competence; however, they have been shown to have low reliability and validity due to variability in the real patients used and subjective examiner grading. In the ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE study, our aim was to assess the effect(s) of expert tuition with hybrid simulation using a simulated patient wearing a novel auscultation vest, i.e. a hybrid simulated patient, and repeated peer grading using scoring checklists on student learning, performance, and acumen in comprehensive consultations of patients with valvular heart disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE was a randomized waitlist-controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment undertaken between February 2021 and November 2021. Students at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland in either the second or third year of the four-year graduate-entry medical degree programme were randomized to a hybrid simulation training or waitlist control group and undertook three consultation assessments of three different clinical presentations of valvular heart disease (cases: C1-C3) using hybrid simulation. Our primary outcome was the difference in total score between and within groups across time; a secondary outcome was any change in inter-rater reliability across time. Students self-reported their proficiency and confidence in comprehensive consultations using a pre- and post-study survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included were 68 students (age 27.6 ± 0.1 years; 74% women). Overall, total score was 39.6% (35.6, 44.9) in C1 and increased to 63.6% (56.7, 66.7) in C3 (P < .001). On intergroup analysis, a significant difference was observed between groups in C2 only (54.2 ± 7.1% vs. 45.6 ± 9.2%; P < .001), a finding that was mainly driven by a difference in physical examination score. On intragroup analysis, significant improvement in total score across time between cases was also observed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for each pair of assessors were excellent (0.885-0.996 [0.806, 0.998]) in all cases. Following participation, students' confidence in comprehensive consultation assessments improved, and they felt more prepared for their future careers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid simulation-based training improves competence and confidence in medical students undertaking comprehensive consultation assessment of cardiac patients. In addition, weighted scoring checklists improve grading consistency, learning through peer assessment, and feedback. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05895799.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"9 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00314-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment of comprehensive consultations in medicine, i.e. a complete history, physical examination, and differential diagnosis, is regarded as authentic tests of clinical competence; however, they have been shown to have low reliability and validity due to variability in the real patients used and subjective examiner grading. In the ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE study, our aim was to assess the effect(s) of expert tuition with hybrid simulation using a simulated patient wearing a novel auscultation vest, i.e. a hybrid simulated patient, and repeated peer grading using scoring checklists on student learning, performance, and acumen in comprehensive consultations of patients with valvular heart disease.

Methods: ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE was a randomized waitlist-controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment undertaken between February 2021 and November 2021. Students at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland in either the second or third year of the four-year graduate-entry medical degree programme were randomized to a hybrid simulation training or waitlist control group and undertook three consultation assessments of three different clinical presentations of valvular heart disease (cases: C1-C3) using hybrid simulation. Our primary outcome was the difference in total score between and within groups across time; a secondary outcome was any change in inter-rater reliability across time. Students self-reported their proficiency and confidence in comprehensive consultations using a pre- and post-study survey.

Results: Included were 68 students (age 27.6 ± 0.1 years; 74% women). Overall, total score was 39.6% (35.6, 44.9) in C1 and increased to 63.6% (56.7, 66.7) in C3 (P < .001). On intergroup analysis, a significant difference was observed between groups in C2 only (54.2 ± 7.1% vs. 45.6 ± 9.2%; P < .001), a finding that was mainly driven by a difference in physical examination score. On intragroup analysis, significant improvement in total score across time between cases was also observed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for each pair of assessors were excellent (0.885-0.996 [0.806, 0.998]) in all cases. Following participation, students' confidence in comprehensive consultation assessments improved, and they felt more prepared for their future careers.

Conclusions: Hybrid simulation-based training improves competence and confidence in medical students undertaking comprehensive consultation assessment of cardiac patients. In addition, weighted scoring checklists improve grading consistency, learning through peer assessment, and feedback. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05895799.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合模拟训练对医学生在心脏病患者全任务会诊中表现的影响:ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE 随机候选对照试验。
背景:医学中的综合会诊评估,即完整的病史、体格检查和鉴别诊断,被认为是临床能力的真实测试;然而,由于所使用的真实患者存在差异以及考官的主观评分,这些评估的可靠性和有效性较低。在 "ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE "研究中,我们的目的是评估在对瓣膜性心脏病患者进行综合会诊时,专家指导与穿戴新型听诊背心的模拟患者(即混合模拟患者)的混合模拟以及使用评分检查表的重复同行评分对学生学习、表现和敏锐度的影响:ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE 是一项随机候选对照试验,在 2021 年 2 月至 2021 年 11 月期间进行盲法结果评估。爱尔兰皇家外科学院四年制研究生入学医学学位课程二年级或三年级的学生被随机分配到混合模拟训练组或候补对照组,并利用混合模拟对三种不同临床表现的瓣膜性心脏病(病例:C1-C3)进行了三次会诊评估。我们的主要结果是各组之间和组内各时间段的总分差异;次要结果是各时间段评分者间可靠性的任何变化。学生通过研究前和研究后的调查自我报告他们在综合会诊中的熟练程度和信心:共纳入 68 名学生(年龄为 27.6 ± 0.1 岁;74% 为女性)。总体而言,总分在 C1 中为 39.6% (35.6, 44.9),在 C3 中增至 63.6% (56.7, 66.7)(P < .001)。在组间分析中,仅 C2 组之间存在显著差异(54.2 ± 7.1% vs. 45.6 ± 9.2%;P < .001),这一结果主要是由体格检查评分的差异引起的。在组内分析中,还观察到不同病例的总分在不同时期有显著提高。在所有案例中,每对评估者的类内相关系数都非常好(0.885-0.996 [0.806,0.998])。参加培训后,学生对综合会诊评估的信心有所提高,并认为自己为未来的职业生涯做好了更充分的准备:结论:基于混合模拟的培训提高了医学生对心脏病患者进行综合会诊评估的能力和信心。此外,加权评分核对表提高了评分的一致性,通过同行评估和反馈进行学习。试验注册 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05895799。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Massive open online course: a new strategy for faculty development needs in healthcare simulation. Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training. Speech recognition technology for assessing team debriefing communication and interaction patterns: An algorithmic toolkit for healthcare simulation educators. Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1