Improved diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with human-derived double-stranded DNA antigen.

IF 10.7 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOPHYSICS Biosensors and Bioelectronics Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.bios.2024.116809
Xianming Li, Honghu Tang, Chunyan Chen, Qian Niu, Zhen Zhou, Yantong Zheng, Yi Liu, Luis E Muñoz, Martin Herrmann, Peng Wu, Yi Zhao
{"title":"Improved diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with human-derived double-stranded DNA antigen.","authors":"Xianming Li, Honghu Tang, Chunyan Chen, Qian Niu, Zhen Zhou, Yantong Zheng, Yi Liu, Luis E Muñoz, Martin Herrmann, Peng Wu, Yi Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.bios.2024.116809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) serve as a crucial serological indicator for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) is mainly used in clinical diagnosis of SLE, but suffers from low specificity, partially because the use of dsDNA antigens of varied sources in current CIA kits that sometimes led to controversial results. On the basis that anti-dsDNA in healthy individuals tend to selectively bind with dsDNA originating from pathogens, whereas pathogenic anti-dsDNA in SLE patients bind all forms of dsDNA, here we proposed the use of dsDNA fragment derived from human genome as antigen (synthesized via PCR using the human genomic DNA as the template). A magnetic bead-based immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was thus developed for SLE diagnosis, which exhibited improved sensitivity and specificity over CIA using the WHO reference reagent (15/174) as standard. For clinical serum sample analysis (n = 590), IFA exhibited an accuracy of 71.9% that was higher than CIA (65.3%). Crucially, the IFA results exhibited stronger correlations with the activity of SLE, renal involvement, and its prognosis. Besides the improved clinical diagnosis, the proposed IFA also holds great promise in assay standardization due to the high homogeneity of the synthetic dsDNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":259,"journal":{"name":"Biosensors and Bioelectronics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosensors and Bioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2024.116809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) serve as a crucial serological indicator for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) is mainly used in clinical diagnosis of SLE, but suffers from low specificity, partially because the use of dsDNA antigens of varied sources in current CIA kits that sometimes led to controversial results. On the basis that anti-dsDNA in healthy individuals tend to selectively bind with dsDNA originating from pathogens, whereas pathogenic anti-dsDNA in SLE patients bind all forms of dsDNA, here we proposed the use of dsDNA fragment derived from human genome as antigen (synthesized via PCR using the human genomic DNA as the template). A magnetic bead-based immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was thus developed for SLE diagnosis, which exhibited improved sensitivity and specificity over CIA using the WHO reference reagent (15/174) as standard. For clinical serum sample analysis (n = 590), IFA exhibited an accuracy of 71.9% that was higher than CIA (65.3%). Crucially, the IFA results exhibited stronger correlations with the activity of SLE, renal involvement, and its prognosis. Besides the improved clinical diagnosis, the proposed IFA also holds great promise in assay standardization due to the high homogeneity of the synthetic dsDNA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过人源双链 DNA 抗原改进系统性红斑狼疮的诊断。
抗双链 DNA 抗体(anti-dsDNA)是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的重要血清学指标。化学发光免疫测定(CIA)主要用于系统性红斑狼疮的临床诊断,但其特异性较低,部分原因是目前的CIA试剂盒使用了不同来源的dsDNA抗原,有时会导致有争议的结果。健康人体内的抗dsDNA往往会选择性地与病原体引起的dsDNA结合,而系统性红斑狼疮患者体内的致病性抗dsDNA则会与所有形式的dsDNA结合,因此,我们在此建议使用源自人类基因组的dsDNA片段作为抗原(以人类基因组DNA为模板,通过PCR合成)。因此,我们开发了一种用于系统性红斑狼疮诊断的磁珠免疫荧光检测法(IFA),与以世界卫生组织参考试剂(15/174)为标准的 CIA 相比,该检测法的灵敏度和特异性都有所提高。在临床血清样本分析(590 人)中,IFA 的准确率为 71.9%,高于 CIA(65.3%)。最重要的是,IFA结果与系统性红斑狼疮的活动性、肾脏受累情况及其预后有更强的相关性。除了改善临床诊断外,由于合成dsDNA的高度均一性,拟议的IFA在检测标准化方面也大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Biosensors and Bioelectronics 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Biosensors & Bioelectronics, along with its open access companion journal Biosensors & Bioelectronics: X, is the leading international publication in the field of biosensors and bioelectronics. It covers research, design, development, and application of biosensors, which are analytical devices incorporating biological materials with physicochemical transducers. These devices, including sensors, DNA chips, electronic noses, and lab-on-a-chip, produce digital signals proportional to specific analytes. Examples include immunosensors and enzyme-based biosensors, applied in various fields such as medicine, environmental monitoring, and food industry. The journal also focuses on molecular and supramolecular structures for enhancing device performance.
期刊最新文献
A novel platform for mutation detection in colorectal cancer using a PNA-LNA molecular switch Electrochemical cytosensors for non-invasive liquid biopsy: Detection procedures and technologies for circulating tumor cells Improved diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with human-derived double-stranded DNA antigen. A portable micro-nanochannel bio-3D printed liver microtissue biosensor for DON detection. Device for detection of activity-dependent changes in neural spheroids at MHz and GHz frequencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1