Use of artificial intelligence-powered ECG to differentiate between cardiac and pulmonary pathologies in patients with acute dyspnoea in the emergency department.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002924
Ji-Hun Jang, Sang-Won Lee, Dae-Young Kim, Sung-Hee Shin, Sang-Chul Lee, Dae-Hyeok Kim, Wonik Choi, Yong-Soo Baek
{"title":"Use of artificial intelligence-powered ECG to differentiate between cardiac and pulmonary pathologies in patients with acute dyspnoea in the emergency department.","authors":"Ji-Hun Jang, Sang-Won Lee, Dae-Young Kim, Sung-Hee Shin, Sang-Chul Lee, Dae-Hyeok Kim, Wonik Choi, Yong-Soo Baek","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute dyspnoea is common in acute care settings. However, identifying the origin of dyspnoea in the emergency department (ED) is often challenging. We aimed to investigate whether our artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ECG analysis reliably distinguishes between the causes of dyspnoea and evaluate its potential as a clinical triage tool for comparing conventional heart failure diagnostic processes using natriuretic peptides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using an AI-based ECG algorithm on patients ≥18 years old presenting with dyspnoea at the ED from February 2006 to September 2023. Patients were categorised into cardiac or pulmonary origin groups based on initial admission. The performance of an AI-ECG using a transformer neural network algorithm was assessed to analyse standard 12-lead ECGs for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of AI-ECG models with N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels to identify cardiac origins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3105 patients included in the study, 1197 had cardiac-origin dyspnoea. The AI-ECG model demonstrated an AUC of 0.938 and 88.1% accuracy for cardiac-origin dyspnoea. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 93.0%, 79.5%, 89.0% and 86.4%, respectively. The F1 score was 0.828. AI-ECG demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in identifying cardiac-origin dyspnoea compared with NT-proBNP. True cardiac origin was confirmed in 96 patients in a sensitivity analysis of 129 patients with a high probability of cardiac origin initially misdiagnosed as pulmonary origin predicted by AI-ECG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-ECG demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy over NT-proBNP and showed promise as a clinical triage tool. It is a potentially valuable tool for identifying the origin of dyspnoea in emergency settings and supporting decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute dyspnoea is common in acute care settings. However, identifying the origin of dyspnoea in the emergency department (ED) is often challenging. We aimed to investigate whether our artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ECG analysis reliably distinguishes between the causes of dyspnoea and evaluate its potential as a clinical triage tool for comparing conventional heart failure diagnostic processes using natriuretic peptides.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using an AI-based ECG algorithm on patients ≥18 years old presenting with dyspnoea at the ED from February 2006 to September 2023. Patients were categorised into cardiac or pulmonary origin groups based on initial admission. The performance of an AI-ECG using a transformer neural network algorithm was assessed to analyse standard 12-lead ECGs for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of AI-ECG models with N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels to identify cardiac origins.

Results: Among the 3105 patients included in the study, 1197 had cardiac-origin dyspnoea. The AI-ECG model demonstrated an AUC of 0.938 and 88.1% accuracy for cardiac-origin dyspnoea. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 93.0%, 79.5%, 89.0% and 86.4%, respectively. The F1 score was 0.828. AI-ECG demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in identifying cardiac-origin dyspnoea compared with NT-proBNP. True cardiac origin was confirmed in 96 patients in a sensitivity analysis of 129 patients with a high probability of cardiac origin initially misdiagnosed as pulmonary origin predicted by AI-ECG.

Conclusions: AI-ECG demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy over NT-proBNP and showed promise as a clinical triage tool. It is a potentially valuable tool for identifying the origin of dyspnoea in emergency settings and supporting decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人工智能驱动的心电图来区分急诊科急性呼吸困难患者的心肺病变。
背景:急性呼吸困难在急诊中很常见。然而,在急诊科(ED)中识别呼吸困难的起因往往具有挑战性。我们旨在研究人工智能(AI)驱动的心电图分析是否能可靠地区分呼吸困难的原因,并评估其作为临床分诊工具的潜力,以比较使用钠尿肽的传统心衰诊断流程:采用基于人工智能的心电图算法,对2006年2月至2023年9月期间在急诊室出现呼吸困难的≥18岁患者进行了回顾性分析。根据初始入院情况将患者分为心源性和肺源性两组。我们评估了使用变压器神经网络算法分析标准 12 导联心电图的 AI-ECG 的准确性、灵敏度、特异性和接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。此外,我们还比较了 AI-ECG 模型与 N 端脑钠肽(NT-proBNP)水平的诊断效果,以确定心脏起源:在纳入研究的 3105 名患者中,有 1197 人患有心源性呼吸困难。AI-ECG模型的AUC为0.938,对心源性呼吸困难的准确率为88.1%。灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 93.0%、79.5%、89.0% 和 86.4%。F1 评分为 0.828。与 NT-proBNP 相比,AI-ECG 在识别心源性呼吸困难方面表现出更优越的诊断性能。在对 129 名最初极有可能被 AI-ECG 误诊为肺源性呼吸困难的患者进行的敏感性分析中,96 名患者被证实为真正的心源性呼吸困难:AI-ECG的诊断准确性优于NT-proBNP,有望成为临床分诊工具。它是在急诊环境中识别呼吸困难病因和辅助决策的一种有潜在价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Long-term effects of left atrial appendage isolation in surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation based on lesion set: a multi-centre propensity-score weighted study. Long-term outcomes of ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstructive sleep apnoea and atrial fibrillation: are we on time?! Use of artificial intelligence-powered ECG to differentiate between cardiac and pulmonary pathologies in patients with acute dyspnoea in the emergency department. Dobutamine stress echocardiography after positive CCTA: diagnostic performance using fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as reference standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1