Revealing the limitations of 10-year MACE observations: 20-year observed total cardiovascular burden in the EPIC-Norfolk study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002981
Tinka J van Trier, Marjolein Snaterse, Jannick An Dorresteijn, Manon van den Bogaart, Wilma Jm Scholte Op Reimer, Frank Lj Visseren, Ron Jg Peters, Harald T Jørstad, S Matthijs Boekholdt
{"title":"Revealing the limitations of 10-year MACE observations: 20-year observed total cardiovascular burden in the EPIC-Norfolk study.","authors":"Tinka J van Trier, Marjolein Snaterse, Jannick An Dorresteijn, Manon van den Bogaart, Wilma Jm Scholte Op Reimer, Frank Lj Visseren, Ron Jg Peters, Harald T Jørstad, S Matthijs Boekholdt","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease (CVD) conventionally rely on 10-year risk estimates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, communicating longer-term total CVD risk may better facilitate informed preventive decisions. Therefore, we aimed to quantify how well 10-year observed incidence reflects 20-year observed incidence and how MACE reflects total CVD events across demographic groups, using observations in long-term prospective data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In individuals aged 40-79 without CVD or diabetes from the population-based EPIC-Norfolk cohort, we compared the first occurrence of 10 and 20 years (1) 3-point MACE events (non-fatal myocardial infarction+non-fatal stroke+fatal CVD) and (2) total CVD events (all non-fatal and fatal CVD events leading to hospitalisation), stratified by sex and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 22 569 participants (57% women), incident 10-year and 20-year 3-point MACE was 5.3% and 15.5%, respectively, yielding 20/10 year ratios from 2.2 (in older men) to 4.5 (in younger women). Total CVD increased from 10.5% at 10 years to 26.9% at 20 years, with ratios ranging from 1.9 (older men) to 3.9 (younger women). Ratios between 10-year MACE and 20-year total CVD varied substantially, ranging from 3-fold in (older men) to 10-fold (younger women).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed incidence of CVD roughly triples from 10 to 20 years of follow-up, with 10-year MACE observations underestimating 20-year total CVD burden by a factor ranging from 3 (older men) to 10 (younger women). These findings highlight the limitations of communicating 10-year MACE risk assessments to facilitate informed decisions in longer-term CVD prevention-particularly in younger women.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease (CVD) conventionally rely on 10-year risk estimates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, communicating longer-term total CVD risk may better facilitate informed preventive decisions. Therefore, we aimed to quantify how well 10-year observed incidence reflects 20-year observed incidence and how MACE reflects total CVD events across demographic groups, using observations in long-term prospective data.

Methods: In individuals aged 40-79 without CVD or diabetes from the population-based EPIC-Norfolk cohort, we compared the first occurrence of 10 and 20 years (1) 3-point MACE events (non-fatal myocardial infarction+non-fatal stroke+fatal CVD) and (2) total CVD events (all non-fatal and fatal CVD events leading to hospitalisation), stratified by sex and age.

Results: Among 22 569 participants (57% women), incident 10-year and 20-year 3-point MACE was 5.3% and 15.5%, respectively, yielding 20/10 year ratios from 2.2 (in older men) to 4.5 (in younger women). Total CVD increased from 10.5% at 10 years to 26.9% at 20 years, with ratios ranging from 1.9 (older men) to 3.9 (younger women). Ratios between 10-year MACE and 20-year total CVD varied substantially, ranging from 3-fold in (older men) to 10-fold (younger women).

Conclusions: The observed incidence of CVD roughly triples from 10 to 20 years of follow-up, with 10-year MACE observations underestimating 20-year total CVD burden by a factor ranging from 3 (older men) to 10 (younger women). These findings highlight the limitations of communicating 10-year MACE risk assessments to facilitate informed decisions in longer-term CVD prevention-particularly in younger women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示10年MACE观察的局限性:EPIC-Norfolk研究中观察到的20年总心血管负担。
背景:心血管疾病(CVD)的一级预防策略传统上依赖于主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的10年风险估计。然而,沟通长期心血管疾病总风险可能更好地促进知情的预防决策。因此,我们的目的是量化10年观察发生率反映20年观察发生率的程度,以及MACE如何反映不同人口群体的心血管疾病总事件,使用长期前瞻性数据进行观察。方法:在以人群为基础的EPIC-Norfolk队列中,我们比较了10年和20年(1)3点MACE事件(非致死性心肌梗死+非致死性卒中+致死性CVD)和(2)总CVD事件(所有导致住院的非致死性和致死性CVD事件)的首次发生率,按性别和年龄分层。结果:在22569名参与者中(57%为女性),10年和20年的3点MACE分别为5.3%和15.5%,20/10年的比率从2.2(老年男性)到4.5(年轻女性)。总心血管疾病从10岁时的10.5%增加到20岁时的26.9%,比率从1.9(老年男性)到3.9(年轻女性)不等。10年MACE和20年总CVD的比值差异很大,从3倍(老年男性)到10倍(年轻女性)不等。结论:观察到的CVD发病率在10- 20年的随访中大约增加了两倍,10年MACE观察低估了20年的CVD总负担,因子范围从3(老年男性)到10(年轻女性)。这些发现强调了沟通10年MACE风险评估以促进长期CVD预防的知情决策的局限性,特别是在年轻女性中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Comparing TA-TAVR and SAVR in severe aortic regurgitation: outcomes and valve haemodynamics. Beyond the tear: the enduring role of aortic pathology in the era of genomic medicine. Biomarkers of iron deficiency and prognosis in patients hospitalised with new-onset heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. ST-segment elevation in acute pericarditis and myocardial involvement: electrocardiographic and clinical profiling. Value of cinematic rendering in cardiac and vascular imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1