Pain disparities attributed to linguistic minoritization in health care settings.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104688
Paulina S Lim, Michelle A Fortier, Zeev N Kain
{"title":"Pain disparities attributed to linguistic minoritization in health care settings.","authors":"Paulina S Lim, Michelle A Fortier, Zeev N Kain","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a paucity of understanding about how language influences pain communication and outcomes for families who speak languages other than English in the United States. This is of great importance because 21.6% (68 million) of the population speak a language other than English, with 8% (25 million) of the population speaking English \"less than very well.\" Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to present a narrative review that describes how spoken language influences pediatric pain assessment and outcomes for children who speak languages other than English and discuss hypothesized factors that contribute to pain disparities in hospital settings. Results from the narrative review reveal that children and families who speak languages other than English have disparate pain outcomes compared to children from English-speaking families. It is hypothesized that individual (e.g., clinician bias), interpersonal (e.g., miscommunication of pain concepts), cultural (e.g., misunderstanding of cultural concepts of pain) and systemic (e.g., lack of access to interpretation services) factors influence disparate pain outcomes for linguistically minoritized children. Empirical research, including randomized control trials, regarding hypothesized factors that contribute to pediatric pain disparities for language other than English speaking children is severely lacking. Thus, improved understanding of pain concepts and pain communication processes that center individual, interpersonal, cultural, and systemic factors will enable future research to design interventions that enhance culturally relevant pain assessment and management for families who speak languages other than English. PERSPECTIVE: This article summarizes factors that contribute to pain disparities for children who speak languages other than English. Hypothesized factors that contribute to pain disparities for LOE-speaking children and families include clinician bias, misunderstanding of pain concepts, and lack of access to interpretation services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a paucity of understanding about how language influences pain communication and outcomes for families who speak languages other than English in the United States. This is of great importance because 21.6% (68 million) of the population speak a language other than English, with 8% (25 million) of the population speaking English "less than very well." Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to present a narrative review that describes how spoken language influences pediatric pain assessment and outcomes for children who speak languages other than English and discuss hypothesized factors that contribute to pain disparities in hospital settings. Results from the narrative review reveal that children and families who speak languages other than English have disparate pain outcomes compared to children from English-speaking families. It is hypothesized that individual (e.g., clinician bias), interpersonal (e.g., miscommunication of pain concepts), cultural (e.g., misunderstanding of cultural concepts of pain) and systemic (e.g., lack of access to interpretation services) factors influence disparate pain outcomes for linguistically minoritized children. Empirical research, including randomized control trials, regarding hypothesized factors that contribute to pediatric pain disparities for language other than English speaking children is severely lacking. Thus, improved understanding of pain concepts and pain communication processes that center individual, interpersonal, cultural, and systemic factors will enable future research to design interventions that enhance culturally relevant pain assessment and management for families who speak languages other than English. PERSPECTIVE: This article summarizes factors that contribute to pain disparities for children who speak languages other than English. Hypothesized factors that contribute to pain disparities for LOE-speaking children and families include clinician bias, misunderstanding of pain concepts, and lack of access to interpretation services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗机构中因语言少数而造成的疼痛差异。
在美国,人们对语言如何影响疼痛交流以及使用英语以外语言的家庭的治疗效果了解甚少。这一点非常重要,因为美国有 21.6% 的人口(6,800 万人)说英语以外的语言,其中 8% 的人口(2,500 万人)英语说得 "不是很好"。因此,本手稿旨在通过叙事性综述,描述口语如何影响儿科疼痛评估和非英语儿童的治疗效果,并讨论造成医院环境中疼痛差异的假设因素。叙述性综述的结果显示,与来自英语家庭的儿童相比,说英语以外语言的儿童和家庭在疼痛结果方面存在差异。假设个人因素(如临床医生的偏见)、人际因素(如疼痛概念的误解)、文化因素(如对疼痛文化概念的误解)和系统因素(如缺乏获得口译服务的途径)会影响语言上属于少数群体的儿童的疼痛结果。关于造成非英语儿童儿科疼痛差异的假设因素,包括随机对照试验在内的实证研究非常缺乏。因此,提高对疼痛概念和以个人、人际、文化和系统因素为中心的疼痛交流过程的理解,将有助于未来的研究设计干预措施,以加强对讲英语以外语言的家庭进行与文化相关的疼痛评估和管理。观点:本文总结了造成非英语儿童疼痛差异的因素。造成讲 LOE 语言的儿童和家庭疼痛差异的假定因素包括临床医生的偏见、对疼痛概念的误解以及缺乏获得口译服务的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
The role and treatment potential of the complement pathway in chronic pain. Pain disparities attributed to linguistic minoritization in health care settings. Prevalence and Factors Associated with High Impact Chronic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: the Johnston County Health Study. Improving Pain Management for Marginalized Communities: Educating the Next Generation of Healthcare Professionals. Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Culturally Diverse Populations: An Intervention Logic Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1