PMCA to demonstrate the efficacy of prion inactivation methods on reusable medical devices: a relevant alternative to animal bioassays

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Hospital Infection Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.020
A. Igel , M. Moudjou , P. Destrez , P. Clayette , V. Béringue
{"title":"PMCA to demonstrate the efficacy of prion inactivation methods on reusable medical devices: a relevant alternative to animal bioassays","authors":"A. Igel ,&nbsp;M. Moudjou ,&nbsp;P. Destrez ,&nbsp;P. Clayette ,&nbsp;V. Béringue","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Validation of prion inactivation processes for medical devices relies on in-vivo experimental protocols. However, bioassays are costly, long (1–2 years) and ethically disputable. Additionally, results obtained with one prion strain – for example, 263K (hamster-adapted strain originating from sheep scrapie) – cannot be easily extrapolated to relevant human prion strains, further questioning the utility of bioassays. Over the past two decades, cell-free prion amplification assays have emerged as potential alternatives to bioassays. Rather than measuring prion infectivity, they quantify prion seeding activity (i.e. the capacity to convert the normal prion protein into the disease-associated isoform). The results obtained from an optimized cell-free assay termed ‘miniaturized-bead protein misfolding cyclic amplification’ (mb-PMCA) with four processes using three different prion strains – 263K and two human prions derived from variant and sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease – were compared with published bioassays using the same three strains and processes, when available. Tests performed on reference processes (steam, sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite) and low temperature H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> sterilization (STERRAD NX<sup>TM</sup> Advanced cycle) showed perfect alignment between mb-PMCA and available bioassays. STERRAD NX<sup>TM</sup> Advanced cycle was efficacious against all three prion strains. These data confirm that PMCA, particularly mb-PMCA, is a relevant alternative to animal bioassays for the assessment of prion inactivation processes, and highlight the interest of some low temperature H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> sterilization cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"154 ","pages":"Pages 60-63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124003177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Validation of prion inactivation processes for medical devices relies on in-vivo experimental protocols. However, bioassays are costly, long (1–2 years) and ethically disputable. Additionally, results obtained with one prion strain – for example, 263K (hamster-adapted strain originating from sheep scrapie) – cannot be easily extrapolated to relevant human prion strains, further questioning the utility of bioassays. Over the past two decades, cell-free prion amplification assays have emerged as potential alternatives to bioassays. Rather than measuring prion infectivity, they quantify prion seeding activity (i.e. the capacity to convert the normal prion protein into the disease-associated isoform). The results obtained from an optimized cell-free assay termed ‘miniaturized-bead protein misfolding cyclic amplification’ (mb-PMCA) with four processes using three different prion strains – 263K and two human prions derived from variant and sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease – were compared with published bioassays using the same three strains and processes, when available. Tests performed on reference processes (steam, sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite) and low temperature H2O2 sterilization (STERRAD NXTM Advanced cycle) showed perfect alignment between mb-PMCA and available bioassays. STERRAD NXTM Advanced cycle was efficacious against all three prion strains. These data confirm that PMCA, particularly mb-PMCA, is a relevant alternative to animal bioassays for the assessment of prion inactivation processes, and highlight the interest of some low temperature H2O2 sterilization cycles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PMCA 用于证明可重复使用医疗器械上朊病毒灭活方法的有效性:动物生物测定的相关替代方法。
医疗器械朊病毒灭活工艺的验证依赖于体内实验方案。然而,生物测定成本高、时间长(一至两年),而且在伦理方面存在争议。此外,用一种朊病毒菌株(例如 263K(源自绵羊瘙痒症的仓鼠适应菌株))获得的结果不能轻易推断到相关的人类朊病毒菌株,这进一步质疑了生物测定的实用性。在过去二十年中,无细胞朊病毒扩增测定法作为生物测定的潜在替代方法应运而生。它们不是测量朊病毒的感染性,而是量化朊病毒的播种活性,即把正常朊病毒蛋白转化为疾病相关异构体的能力。通过使用三种不同的朊病毒菌株(263K 和两种来自变异型克雅氏病和散发性克雅氏病的人类朊病毒),采用四种工艺进行了称为微型化珠蛋白错构酶循环扩增(mb-PMCA)的优化无细胞检测,并将其结果与已发表的使用相同的三种菌株和工艺(如有)进行的生物检测结果进行了比较。在参考工艺(蒸汽、氢氧化钠、次氯酸钠)和低温 H2O2 灭菌工艺(STERRAD NXTM 高级循环)上进行的测试表明,mb-PMCA 与现有的生物测定完全一致。STERRAD NXTM 高级循环对所有三种朊病毒菌株都有效。这些数据证实,PMCA,尤其是mb-PMCA,可以替代动物生物测定法来评估朊病毒灭活过程和某些低温 H2O2 灭菌循环的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
期刊最新文献
Drain decontamination using in-situ generated ozone. Factors associated with core competencies of infection prevention and control practitioners in 511 hospitals: A large cross-sectional survey in Guizhou in southwest China. Prognosis analysis and infection-related risk factors of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a general hospital in China, 2019-2023. Survey of healthcare-associated sink infrastructure, and sink trap antibiotic residues and biochemistry, in 29 UK hospitals. Optimization and evaluation of new decontamination procedures inactivating human prions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1