A. Igel , M. Moudjou , P. Destrez , P. Clayette , V. Béringue
{"title":"PMCA to demonstrate the efficacy of prion inactivation methods on reusable medical devices: a relevant alternative to animal bioassays","authors":"A. Igel , M. Moudjou , P. Destrez , P. Clayette , V. Béringue","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Validation of prion inactivation processes for medical devices relies on in-vivo experimental protocols. However, bioassays are costly, long (1–2 years) and ethically disputable. Additionally, results obtained with one prion strain – for example, 263K (hamster-adapted strain originating from sheep scrapie) – cannot be easily extrapolated to relevant human prion strains, further questioning the utility of bioassays. Over the past two decades, cell-free prion amplification assays have emerged as potential alternatives to bioassays. Rather than measuring prion infectivity, they quantify prion seeding activity (i.e. the capacity to convert the normal prion protein into the disease-associated isoform). The results obtained from an optimized cell-free assay termed ‘miniaturized-bead protein misfolding cyclic amplification’ (mb-PMCA) with four processes using three different prion strains – 263K and two human prions derived from variant and sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease – were compared with published bioassays using the same three strains and processes, when available. Tests performed on reference processes (steam, sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite) and low temperature H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> sterilization (STERRAD NX<sup>TM</sup> Advanced cycle) showed perfect alignment between mb-PMCA and available bioassays. STERRAD NX<sup>TM</sup> Advanced cycle was efficacious against all three prion strains. These data confirm that PMCA, particularly mb-PMCA, is a relevant alternative to animal bioassays for the assessment of prion inactivation processes, and highlight the interest of some low temperature H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> sterilization cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"154 ","pages":"Pages 60-63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124003177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Validation of prion inactivation processes for medical devices relies on in-vivo experimental protocols. However, bioassays are costly, long (1–2 years) and ethically disputable. Additionally, results obtained with one prion strain – for example, 263K (hamster-adapted strain originating from sheep scrapie) – cannot be easily extrapolated to relevant human prion strains, further questioning the utility of bioassays. Over the past two decades, cell-free prion amplification assays have emerged as potential alternatives to bioassays. Rather than measuring prion infectivity, they quantify prion seeding activity (i.e. the capacity to convert the normal prion protein into the disease-associated isoform). The results obtained from an optimized cell-free assay termed ‘miniaturized-bead protein misfolding cyclic amplification’ (mb-PMCA) with four processes using three different prion strains – 263K and two human prions derived from variant and sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease – were compared with published bioassays using the same three strains and processes, when available. Tests performed on reference processes (steam, sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite) and low temperature H2O2 sterilization (STERRAD NXTM Advanced cycle) showed perfect alignment between mb-PMCA and available bioassays. STERRAD NXTM Advanced cycle was efficacious against all three prion strains. These data confirm that PMCA, particularly mb-PMCA, is a relevant alternative to animal bioassays for the assessment of prion inactivation processes, and highlight the interest of some low temperature H2O2 sterilization cycles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.