Blake E Dewey, Samuel W Remedios, Muraleetharan Sanjayan, Nicole Bou Rjeily, Alexandra Zambriczki Lee, Chelsea Wyche, Safiya Duncan, Jerry L Prince, Peter A Calabresi, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Ellen M Mowry
{"title":"Super-Resolution in Clinically Available Spinal Cord MRIs Enables Automated Atrophy Analysis.","authors":"Blake E Dewey, Samuel W Remedios, Muraleetharan Sanjayan, Nicole Bou Rjeily, Alexandra Zambriczki Lee, Chelsea Wyche, Safiya Duncan, Jerry L Prince, Peter A Calabresi, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Ellen M Mowry","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Measurement of the mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) is an important biomarker in the study of neurodegeneration. However, dedicated high-resolution scans of the cervical spinal cord are rare in standard-of-care imaging due to timing and clinical usability. Most clinical cervical spinal cord imaging is sagittally acquired in 2D with thick slices and anisotropic voxels. As a solution, previous work describes high-resolution T1-weighted brain imaging for measuring the upper cord area, but this is still not common in clinical care.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We propose using a zero-shot super-resolution technique, SMORE, already validated in the brain, to enhance the resolution of 2D-acquired scans for upper cord area calculations. To incorporate super-resolution in spinal cord analysis, we validate SMORE against high-resolution research imaging and in a real-world longitudinal data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Super-resolved images reconstructed using SMORE showed significantly greater similarity to the ground truth than low-resolution images across all tested resolutions (p<0.001 for all resolutions in PSNR and MSSIM). MUCCA results from super-resolved scans demonstrate excellent correlation with high-resolution scans (r>0.973 for all resolutions) compared to low-resolution scans. Additionally, super-resolved scans are consistent between resolutions (r>0.969), an essential factor in longitudinal analysis. Compared to clinical outcomes such as walking speed or disease severity, MUCCA values from low-resolution scans have significantly lower correlations than those from high-resolution scans. Super-resolved results have no significant difference. In a longitudinal real-world dataset, we show that these super-resolved volumes can be used in conjunction with T1-weighted brain scans to show a significant rate of atrophy (-0.790, p=0.020 vs. -0.438, p=0.301 with low-resolution).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Super-resolution is a valuable tool for enabling large-scale studies of cord atrophy, as low-resolution images acquired in clinical practice are common and available.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>MS=multiple sclerosis; MUCCA=mean upper cervical cord; HR=high-resolution; LR=low-resolution; SR=superresolved; CSC=cervical spinal cord; PMJ=pontomedullary junction; MSSIM=mean structural similarity; PSNR=peak signal-to-noise ratio; EDSS=expanded disability status scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Measurement of the mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) is an important biomarker in the study of neurodegeneration. However, dedicated high-resolution scans of the cervical spinal cord are rare in standard-of-care imaging due to timing and clinical usability. Most clinical cervical spinal cord imaging is sagittally acquired in 2D with thick slices and anisotropic voxels. As a solution, previous work describes high-resolution T1-weighted brain imaging for measuring the upper cord area, but this is still not common in clinical care.
Materials and methods: We propose using a zero-shot super-resolution technique, SMORE, already validated in the brain, to enhance the resolution of 2D-acquired scans for upper cord area calculations. To incorporate super-resolution in spinal cord analysis, we validate SMORE against high-resolution research imaging and in a real-world longitudinal data analysis.
Results: Super-resolved images reconstructed using SMORE showed significantly greater similarity to the ground truth than low-resolution images across all tested resolutions (p<0.001 for all resolutions in PSNR and MSSIM). MUCCA results from super-resolved scans demonstrate excellent correlation with high-resolution scans (r>0.973 for all resolutions) compared to low-resolution scans. Additionally, super-resolved scans are consistent between resolutions (r>0.969), an essential factor in longitudinal analysis. Compared to clinical outcomes such as walking speed or disease severity, MUCCA values from low-resolution scans have significantly lower correlations than those from high-resolution scans. Super-resolved results have no significant difference. In a longitudinal real-world dataset, we show that these super-resolved volumes can be used in conjunction with T1-weighted brain scans to show a significant rate of atrophy (-0.790, p=0.020 vs. -0.438, p=0.301 with low-resolution).
Conclusions: Super-resolution is a valuable tool for enabling large-scale studies of cord atrophy, as low-resolution images acquired in clinical practice are common and available.