Exploring the circulating metabolome of sepsis: metabolomic and lipidomic profiles sampled in the ambulance.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Metabolomics Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s11306-024-02172-5
Samira Salihovic, Daniel Eklund, Robert Kruse, Ulrika Wallgren, Tuulia Hyötyläinen, Eva Särndahl, Lisa Kurland
{"title":"Exploring the circulating metabolome of sepsis: metabolomic and lipidomic profiles sampled in the ambulance.","authors":"Samira Salihovic, Daniel Eklund, Robert Kruse, Ulrika Wallgren, Tuulia Hyötyläinen, Eva Särndahl, Lisa Kurland","doi":"10.1007/s11306-024-02172-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is defined as a dysfunctional host response to infection. The diverse clinical presentations of sepsis pose diagnostic challenges and there is a demand for enhanced diagnostic markers for sepsis as well as an understanding of the underlying pathological mechanisms involved in sepsis. From this perspective, metabolomics has emerged as a potentially valuable tool for aiding in the early identification of sepsis that could highlight key metabolic pathways and underlying pathological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this investigation is to explore the early metabolomic and lipidomic profiles in a prospective cohort where plasma samples (n = 138) were obtained during ambulance transport among patients with infection according to clinical judgement who subsequently developed sepsis, patients who developed non-septic infection, and symptomatic controls without an infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiplatform metabolomics and lipidomics were performed using UHPLC-MS/MS and UHPLC-QTOFMS. Uni- and multivariable analysis were used to identify metabolite profiles in sepsis vs symptomatic control and sepsis vs non-septic infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariable analysis disclosed that out of the 457 annotated metabolites measured across three different platforms, 23 polar, 27 semipolar metabolites and 133 molecular lipids exhibited significant differences between patients who developed sepsis and symptomatic controls following correction for multiple testing. Furthermore, 84 metabolites remained significantly different between sepsis and symptomatic controls following adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity score. Notably, no significant differences were identified in metabolites levels when comparing patients with sepsis and non-septic infection in univariable and multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we found that the metabolome, including the lipidome, was decreased in patients experiencing infection and sepsis, with no significant differences between the two conditions. This finding indicates that the observed metabolic profiles are shared between both infection and sepsis, rather than being exclusive to sepsis alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":18506,"journal":{"name":"Metabolomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-024-02172-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is defined as a dysfunctional host response to infection. The diverse clinical presentations of sepsis pose diagnostic challenges and there is a demand for enhanced diagnostic markers for sepsis as well as an understanding of the underlying pathological mechanisms involved in sepsis. From this perspective, metabolomics has emerged as a potentially valuable tool for aiding in the early identification of sepsis that could highlight key metabolic pathways and underlying pathological mechanisms.

Objective: The aim of this investigation is to explore the early metabolomic and lipidomic profiles in a prospective cohort where plasma samples (n = 138) were obtained during ambulance transport among patients with infection according to clinical judgement who subsequently developed sepsis, patients who developed non-septic infection, and symptomatic controls without an infection.

Methods: Multiplatform metabolomics and lipidomics were performed using UHPLC-MS/MS and UHPLC-QTOFMS. Uni- and multivariable analysis were used to identify metabolite profiles in sepsis vs symptomatic control and sepsis vs non-septic infection.

Results: Univariable analysis disclosed that out of the 457 annotated metabolites measured across three different platforms, 23 polar, 27 semipolar metabolites and 133 molecular lipids exhibited significant differences between patients who developed sepsis and symptomatic controls following correction for multiple testing. Furthermore, 84 metabolites remained significantly different between sepsis and symptomatic controls following adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity score. Notably, no significant differences were identified in metabolites levels when comparing patients with sepsis and non-septic infection in univariable and multivariable analyses.

Conclusion: Overall, we found that the metabolome, including the lipidome, was decreased in patients experiencing infection and sepsis, with no significant differences between the two conditions. This finding indicates that the observed metabolic profiles are shared between both infection and sepsis, rather than being exclusive to sepsis alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索败血症的循环代谢组:在救护车上采样的代谢组和脂质组图谱。
背景:败血症被定义为宿主对感染的机能失调反应。败血症的临床表现多种多样,给诊断带来了挑战,因此需要增强败血症的诊断指标,并了解败血症的潜在病理机制。从这个角度来看,代谢组学已成为一种潜在的有价值的工具,可帮助早期识别脓毒症,突出关键的代谢途径和潜在的病理机制:本研究旨在探索一个前瞻性队列中的早期代谢组学和脂质组学特征,该队列在救护车运送过程中采集了根据临床判断感染并随后发展为败血症的患者、非化脓性感染患者和无症状对照组患者的血浆样本(n = 138):方法:使用 UHPLC-MS/MS 和 UHPLC-QTOFMS 进行多平台代谢组学和脂质组学研究。采用单变量和多变量分析确定败血症与无症状对照组、败血症与非败血症感染组的代谢物特征:单变量分析表明,在三个不同平台测定的 457 种注释代谢物中,23 种极性代谢物、27 种半极性代谢物和 133 种分子脂质在进行多重检验校正后,在脓毒症患者和症状对照组之间存在显著差异。此外,在对年龄、性别和 Charlson 合并症评分进行调整后,84 种代谢物在败血症患者和有症状的对照组之间仍存在显著差异。值得注意的是,在单变量和多变量分析中,比较败血症和非败血症感染患者的代谢物水平未发现明显差异:总体而言,我们发现感染和败血症患者的代谢组(包括脂质组)均有所下降,两种情况之间无明显差异。这一发现表明,所观察到的代谢特征是感染和败血症共有的,而不是败血症独有的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolomics
Metabolomics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Metabolomics publishes current research regarding the development of technology platforms for metabolomics. This includes, but is not limited to: metabolomic applications within man, including pre-clinical and clinical pharmacometabolomics for precision medicine metabolic profiling and fingerprinting metabolite target analysis metabolomic applications within animals, plants and microbes transcriptomics and proteomics in systems biology Metabolomics is an indispensable platform for researchers using new post-genomics approaches, to discover networks and interactions between metabolites, pharmaceuticals, SNPs, proteins and more. Its articles go beyond the genome and metabolome, by including original clinical study material together with big data from new emerging technologies.
期刊最新文献
Multiplatform metabolomic interlaboratory study of a whole human stool candidate reference material from omnivore and vegan donors. Sex-bias metabolism of fetal organs, and their relationship to the regulation of fetal brain-placental axis. Identification of novel hypertension biomarkers using explainable AI and metabolomics. Association of urinary volatile organic compounds and chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes: real-world evidence from the NHANES. Investigation of the reproducibility of the treatment efficacy of a commercial bio stimulant using metabolic profiling on flax.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1