Intra-epidermal electrically evoked potentials are sensitive to detect degenerative cervical myelopathy suggesting their spinothalamic propagation

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2024.09.015
{"title":"Intra-epidermal electrically evoked potentials are sensitive to detect degenerative cervical myelopathy suggesting their spinothalamic propagation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a centromedullary spinal cord disorder mainly affecting crossing fibers. While contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) are sensitive in detecting DCM by testing spinothalamic integrity, somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEPs) show unaffected dorsal column conduction. Intra-epidermal electrically evoked potentials (IEEPs) have unknown spinal propagation after noxious stimulation. We investigated (1) the spinothalamic tract propagation and (2) the discriminative power in detecting spinal pathology of IEEPs compared to CHEPs and dSSEPs in DCM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DCM was diagnosed by neurological examination regarding stenosis (MRI). Stimulation of C6, C8, and T4 dermatomes yielded dSSEPs, CHEPs, and IEEPs. (1) Spinal propagation was assessed through concordant or discordant responses, and (2) discriminative power was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven patients (8F, 56 ± 12yrs) with DCM were analyzed and compared to age-matched healthy controls. IEEPs were abnormal in 43–54%, CHEPs in 37–69%, and dSSEPs in 4–12%. IEEPs showed high concordance with abnormalities of CHEPs (62–69%). ROC analyses showed good discriminative power of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The concordance of abnormal responses of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs suggests spinothalamic propagation of IEEPs.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Minimal differences between CHEPs and IEEPs suggest complementary potential by the combined testing of spinothalamic tract integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a centromedullary spinal cord disorder mainly affecting crossing fibers. While contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) are sensitive in detecting DCM by testing spinothalamic integrity, somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEPs) show unaffected dorsal column conduction. Intra-epidermal electrically evoked potentials (IEEPs) have unknown spinal propagation after noxious stimulation. We investigated (1) the spinothalamic tract propagation and (2) the discriminative power in detecting spinal pathology of IEEPs compared to CHEPs and dSSEPs in DCM.

Methods

DCM was diagnosed by neurological examination regarding stenosis (MRI). Stimulation of C6, C8, and T4 dermatomes yielded dSSEPs, CHEPs, and IEEPs. (1) Spinal propagation was assessed through concordant or discordant responses, and (2) discriminative power was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).

Results

Twenty-seven patients (8F, 56 ± 12yrs) with DCM were analyzed and compared to age-matched healthy controls. IEEPs were abnormal in 43–54%, CHEPs in 37–69%, and dSSEPs in 4–12%. IEEPs showed high concordance with abnormalities of CHEPs (62–69%). ROC analyses showed good discriminative power of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs.

Conclusions

The concordance of abnormal responses of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs suggests spinothalamic propagation of IEEPs.

Significance

Minimal differences between CHEPs and IEEPs suggest complementary potential by the combined testing of spinothalamic tract integrity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表皮内电诱发电位能敏感地检测出退行性颈椎病,这表明它们是通过脊髓传播的。
目的:退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)是一种主要影响交叉纤维的脊髓中央型疾病。接触热诱发电位(CHEPs)可通过检测脊髓的完整性灵敏地检测出 DCM,而体感诱发电位(dSSEPs)则显示背柱传导未受影响。表皮内电诱发电位(IEEPs)在受到有害刺激后的脊髓传播情况不明。我们研究了(1)脊束传播和(2)与CHEPs和dSSEPs相比,IEEPs在检测DCM脊柱病变方面的鉴别力:通过神经系统检查和核磁共振成像(MRI)诊断 DCM。刺激 C6、C8 和 T4 皮节可产生 dSSEPs、CHEPs 和 IEEPs。(1)通过一致或不一致的反应评估脊髓传播,(2)使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)确定鉴别力:对 27 名 DCM 患者(8 名女性,56 ± 12 岁)进行了分析,并与年龄匹配的健康对照组进行了比较。43-54%的患者 IEEPs 异常,37-69%的患者 CHEPs 异常,4-12%的患者 dSSEPs 异常。IEEPs与CHEPs异常的一致性很高(62-69%)。ROC分析表明,CHEPs和IEEPs与dSSEPs相比具有良好的鉴别力:结论:与 dSSEPs 相反,CHEPs 和 IEEPs 的异常反应一致,这表明 IEEPs 是由脊髓传播的:意义:CHEPs 和 IEEPs 之间的微小差异表明,通过对脊束完整性的联合检测,两者具有互补潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
期刊最新文献
Polygenic mutations and their brain spatial expression contribute to presurgical evaluation in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A case report Low-frequency EEG power and coherence differ between drug-induced parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease Patterns of ictal surface EEG in occipital seizures: A simultaneous scalp and intracerebral recording study EEG-based responses of patients with disorders of consciousness and healthy controls to familiar and non-familiar emotional videos Effects of cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on spinal excitability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1