Urinary biomarkers for active Lupus Nephritis that have survived independent validation across cohorts

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney international Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2024.09.007
Sonja Vodehnal , Chandra Mohan
{"title":"Urinary biomarkers for active Lupus Nephritis that have survived independent validation across cohorts","authors":"Sonja Vodehnal ,&nbsp;Chandra Mohan","doi":"10.1016/j.kint.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most reported biomarkers for lupus nephritis (LN) have not been independently validated across cohorts. Moreover, many of the documented biomarker candidates have been reported to be elevated in LN compared to healthy controls. However, biomarkers that distinguish patients with active LN (ALN) from inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (iSLE) hold significant clinical utility. Hence, our review attempts to identify urine protein biomarkers for LN that have been independently validated across two or more cohorts and exhibit good diagnostic potential for distinguishing ALN from iSLE. PubMed and OVID were screened for studies assessing the diagnostic value of urinary biomarkers in patients with ALN compared to iSLE. Forty peer-reviewed articles were evaluated, encompassing urine biomarker data from 3,411 distinct patients. Of the 32 candidate biomarkers identified, fourteen were repeatedly reported/tested in four or more papers each, namely ALCAM, CCL2 (MCP1), CD163, HAVCR1 (KIM-1), HPGDS, ICAM-1 (CD54), ICAM-2 (CD102), IGFBP-2, LCN2, NCAM-1 (CD56), SELE (E-Selectin), SELL (L-Selectin), TNFSF12 (TWEAK), and VCAM-1, with most exhibiting C-statistics of 0.80 or more across multiple studies when discriminating patients with ALN from iSLE. The 32 reproducibly elevated biomarkers for active LN mapped to nine functional categories. The urinary proteins reported here promise to serve as a liquid biopsy for ALN. Besides representing potential candidates for diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers in LN, they also provide a window into potential molecular processes within the kidney that may be driving LN. Thus, ongoing advances in proteomics, which offer wider proteome coverage at increased sensitivity, are likely to further reshape our perspective of urinary biomarkers for LN.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17801,"journal":{"name":"Kidney international","volume":"106 6","pages":"Pages 1135-1145"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085253824006963","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most reported biomarkers for lupus nephritis (LN) have not been independently validated across cohorts. Moreover, many of the documented biomarker candidates have been reported to be elevated in LN compared to healthy controls. However, biomarkers that distinguish patients with active LN (ALN) from inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (iSLE) hold significant clinical utility. Hence, our review attempts to identify urine protein biomarkers for LN that have been independently validated across two or more cohorts and exhibit good diagnostic potential for distinguishing ALN from iSLE. PubMed and OVID were screened for studies assessing the diagnostic value of urinary biomarkers in patients with ALN compared to iSLE. Forty peer-reviewed articles were evaluated, encompassing urine biomarker data from 3,411 distinct patients. Of the 32 candidate biomarkers identified, fourteen were repeatedly reported/tested in four or more papers each, namely ALCAM, CCL2 (MCP1), CD163, HAVCR1 (KIM-1), HPGDS, ICAM-1 (CD54), ICAM-2 (CD102), IGFBP-2, LCN2, NCAM-1 (CD56), SELE (E-Selectin), SELL (L-Selectin), TNFSF12 (TWEAK), and VCAM-1, with most exhibiting C-statistics of 0.80 or more across multiple studies when discriminating patients with ALN from iSLE. The 32 reproducibly elevated biomarkers for active LN mapped to nine functional categories. The urinary proteins reported here promise to serve as a liquid biopsy for ALN. Besides representing potential candidates for diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers in LN, they also provide a window into potential molecular processes within the kidney that may be driving LN. Thus, ongoing advances in proteomics, which offer wider proteome coverage at increased sensitivity, are likely to further reshape our perspective of urinary biomarkers for LN.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经不同组群独立验证的活动性狼疮性肾炎尿液生物标志物。
大多数已报道的狼疮肾炎(LN)生物标志物尚未在不同队列中得到独立验证。此外,据报道,与健康对照组相比,狼疮性肾炎患者的许多候选生物标志物都会升高。然而,能将活动性 LN(ALN)患者与非活动性系统性红斑狼疮(iSLE)患者区分开来的生物标志物具有重要的临床实用价值。因此,我们的综述试图找出已在两个或更多队列中得到独立验证的 LN 尿蛋白生物标记物,这些标记物在区分 ALN 和 iSLE 方面具有良好的诊断潜力。我们在 PubMed 和 OVID 上筛选了评估 ALN 患者尿液生物标志物与 iSLE 患者尿液生物标志物诊断价值的研究。共评估了40篇经同行评审的文章,涵盖了3411名不同患者的尿液生物标志物数据。在确定的 32 个候选生物标志物中,有 14 个在四篇或四篇以上的论文中被重复报道/测试过,它们分别是 ALCAM、CCL2 (MCP1)、CD163、HAVCR1 (KIM-1)、HPGDS、ICAM-1 (CD54)、ICAM-2 (CD102)、IGFBP-2、LCN2、NCAM-1 (CD56)、SELE (E-选择素)、SELL (L-选择素)、TNFSF12 (TWEAK) 和 VCAM-1。80 或更高。32种可重复升高的活动性LN生物标志物可归纳为九种功能类别。这里报告的尿液蛋白质有望成为 ALN 的液体活检样本。除了作为 LN 诊断、监测、预测和预后生物标志物的潜在候选者外,它们还为了解肾脏内可能驱动 LN 的潜在分子过程提供了一个窗口。因此,蛋白质组学的不断进步能以更高的灵敏度提供更广泛的蛋白质组覆盖范围,很可能会进一步重塑我们对 LN 尿液生物标志物的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney international
Kidney international 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
23.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
490
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney International (KI), the official journal of the International Society of Nephrology, is led by Dr. Pierre Ronco (Paris, France) and stands as one of nephrology's most cited and esteemed publications worldwide. KI provides exceptional benefits for both readers and authors, featuring highly cited original articles, focused reviews, cutting-edge imaging techniques, and lively discussions on controversial topics. The journal is dedicated to kidney research, serving researchers, clinical investigators, and practicing nephrologists.
期刊最新文献
in this issue Editorial Board Table of Contents Allocation biopsies of deceased donor kidneys: a necessary tool to expand the donor pool Biopsy before transplant: optimizing allocation or fueling discard?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1