Adherence to optimal delirium management practices in intensive care units in Brazil: a nationwide survey.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000470
Mateus Meneses Bispo, Regina Claudia da Silva Souza
{"title":"Adherence to optimal delirium management practices in intensive care units in Brazil: a nationwide survey.","authors":"Mateus Meneses Bispo, Regina Claudia da Silva Souza","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective delirium management is crucial, considering its association with adverse outcomes. Adherence to best practices has the potential to reduce the incidence and prevalence of delirium and improve health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this project were to describe self-assessed adherence to best practices in delirium management by health care professionals in intensive care units (ICUs) in Brazil, assess the health care professionals' perception of the importance of adequate delirium prevention and treatment in ICUs, and compare the compliance rates with best practices between public and private ICUs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Brazil using an online questionnaire consisting of three parts, namely, data about the health care professionals and the ICU in which they worked; statements about the 17 best practices; and questions related to perceptions of delirium prevention and management by ICU physicians and nurses. The survey was sent to email addresses registered with the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The compliance rate exceeded 50% for only eight best practices. These included the identification and management of pressure sores and falls in delirium patients, with compliance rates of 77.8% and 74.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among ICU professionals in Brazil, adherence to best practices in delirium management is low, particularly for practices involving patient education and involvement of their relatives in their care. These results emphasize the importance of enhancing delirium management in Brazilian health care institutions, regardless of hospital classification.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A274.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective delirium management is crucial, considering its association with adverse outcomes. Adherence to best practices has the potential to reduce the incidence and prevalence of delirium and improve health outcomes.

Objectives: The objectives of this project were to describe self-assessed adherence to best practices in delirium management by health care professionals in intensive care units (ICUs) in Brazil, assess the health care professionals' perception of the importance of adequate delirium prevention and treatment in ICUs, and compare the compliance rates with best practices between public and private ICUs.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Brazil using an online questionnaire consisting of three parts, namely, data about the health care professionals and the ICU in which they worked; statements about the 17 best practices; and questions related to perceptions of delirium prevention and management by ICU physicians and nurses. The survey was sent to email addresses registered with the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine.

Results: The compliance rate exceeded 50% for only eight best practices. These included the identification and management of pressure sores and falls in delirium patients, with compliance rates of 77.8% and 74.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Among ICU professionals in Brazil, adherence to best practices in delirium management is low, particularly for practices involving patient education and involvement of their relatives in their care. These results emphasize the importance of enhancing delirium management in Brazilian health care institutions, regardless of hospital classification.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A274.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西重症监护病房对最佳谵妄管理措施的遵守情况:一项全国性调查。
背景:考虑到谵妄与不良后果的关联,有效的谵妄管理至关重要。坚持最佳实践有可能降低谵妄的发生率和流行率,改善健康状况:本项目旨在描述巴西重症监护病房(ICU)医护人员对谵妄管理最佳实践的自我评估遵守情况,评估医护人员对重症监护病房充分预防和治疗谵妄重要性的认识,并比较公立和私立重症监护病房对最佳实践的遵守率:在巴西进行了一项横断面研究,采用的在线调查问卷包括三个部分,即医护人员及其工作的重症监护室的相关数据、有关 17 项最佳实践的声明以及与重症监护室医生和护士对谵妄预防和管理的看法相关的问题。调查表发送至在巴西重症监护医学协会注册的电子邮件地址:结果:只有八项最佳实践的符合率超过了 50%。结果:只有八项最佳实践的符合率超过了50%,其中包括压疮的识别和管理以及谵妄患者的跌倒,符合率分别为77.8%和74.1%:结论:在巴西的重症监护室专业人员中,谵妄管理最佳实践的依从性较低,尤其是涉及患者教育和亲属参与护理的实践。这些结果强调了加强巴西医疗机构谵妄管理的重要性,无论医院分类如何。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A274。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1