A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The "Sinus Pack" technique. Histomorphometric analysis. Part 2/3.
Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Piotr Wychowański, Massimo Del Fabbro, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona
{"title":"A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The \"Sinus Pack\" technique. Histomorphometric analysis. Part 2/3.","authors":"Pier C Passarelli, Michele A Lopez, Andrea Netti, Piotr Wychowański, Massimo Del Fabbro, Matteo Chiapasco, Antonio D'Addona","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study examined the histomorphometrical outcomes resulting from managing Schneiderian membrane perforation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation using two different approaches and relating the results to perforation size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>19 subjects (7 males, 12 females, mean age 53.3±10.5 years), who experienced a sinus membrane perforation during lateral sinus lift procedure, were enrolled. Perforations were addressed utilizing either the \"Sinus Pack\" technique (test group, 11 subjects) or collagen membranes with absorbable sutures (control group, 8 subjects). The \"Sinus Pack\" consisted of a combination of collagenated porcine bone, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a biocompatible synthetic copolymer, wrapped in a resorbable porcine mesenchymal collagen membrane. Histomorphometry outcomes of both techniques were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of vital bone was significantly higher with the \"Sinus Pack\" approach (44.5% ± 19.8%) compared to the control group (26.3% ± 21.2%) (P= 0.045).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The \"Sinus Pack\" approach for managing sinus membrane perforations appears to be effective and advantageous, as it has resulted in optimal histomorphometric outcomes, indicating a significant increase in vital bone.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 SIA","pages":"18A-20A"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This retrospective study examined the histomorphometrical outcomes resulting from managing Schneiderian membrane perforation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation using two different approaches and relating the results to perforation size.
Methods: 19 subjects (7 males, 12 females, mean age 53.3±10.5 years), who experienced a sinus membrane perforation during lateral sinus lift procedure, were enrolled. Perforations were addressed utilizing either the "Sinus Pack" technique (test group, 11 subjects) or collagen membranes with absorbable sutures (control group, 8 subjects). The "Sinus Pack" consisted of a combination of collagenated porcine bone, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a biocompatible synthetic copolymer, wrapped in a resorbable porcine mesenchymal collagen membrane. Histomorphometry outcomes of both techniques were compared.
Results: The percentage of vital bone was significantly higher with the "Sinus Pack" approach (44.5% ± 19.8%) compared to the control group (26.3% ± 21.2%) (P= 0.045).
Clinical significance: The "Sinus Pack" approach for managing sinus membrane perforations appears to be effective and advantageous, as it has resulted in optimal histomorphometric outcomes, indicating a significant increase in vital bone.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.