Association of Cannabis Use Reduction With Improved Functional Outcomes: An Exploratory Aggregated Analysis From Seven Cannabis Use Disorder Treatment Trials to Extract Data-Driven Cannabis Reduction Metrics.

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY American Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.20230508
Erin A McClure, Brian Neelon, Rachel L Tomko, Kevin M Gray, Aimee L McRae-Clark, Nathaniel L Baker
{"title":"Association of Cannabis Use Reduction With Improved Functional Outcomes: An Exploratory Aggregated Analysis From Seven Cannabis Use Disorder Treatment Trials to Extract Data-Driven Cannabis Reduction Metrics.","authors":"Erin A McClure, Brian Neelon, Rachel L Tomko, Kevin M Gray, Aimee L McRae-Clark, Nathaniel L Baker","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20230508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This exploratory analysis sought to determine whether decreases in cannabis use are associated with improvements in cannabis-related problems and functional outcomes, and if so, what percentage decrease is associated with improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were aggregated from seven cannabis use disorder treatment trials conducted in the United States (N=920; ages 13 years and older; mean age, 25 years; 30% female, 7% Black, 11% Hispanic/Latinx). Outcome measures included the patient-reported Marijuana Problems Scale (MPS), Health-Related Quality of Life scale (HRQOL), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) severity and improvement scales (CGI-S and CGI-I). Generalized estimating equations tested the association between changes in 4-week cannabis use and improvements in functional outcomes. Classification and regression tree (CART) models were developed to determine what reductions in cannabis use could be used as classifiers of improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Decreases in the amount and frequency of cannabis use were significantly associated with improvements in MPS severity and total scores as well as improvements on the CGI-I and in sleep quality, but not improvements on the HRQOL. CART models performed best for CGI-I scores (72%-75% correct classification), while other outcome measures did not perform as well (40%-62% correct classification). CART models showed improvements on the CGI at 74% reduction in use amounts and 47% reduction in use days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reductions in cannabis use (∼50% reduction in use days and ∼75% reduction in use amounts) were associated with clinician-assessed improvement, which suggests that cannabis use reduction may yield benefit among individuals with cannabis use disorder. These exploratory results extract a data-driven metric to inform future studies, clinicians, patients, and policy recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7656,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20230508","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This exploratory analysis sought to determine whether decreases in cannabis use are associated with improvements in cannabis-related problems and functional outcomes, and if so, what percentage decrease is associated with improvement.

Methods: Data were aggregated from seven cannabis use disorder treatment trials conducted in the United States (N=920; ages 13 years and older; mean age, 25 years; 30% female, 7% Black, 11% Hispanic/Latinx). Outcome measures included the patient-reported Marijuana Problems Scale (MPS), Health-Related Quality of Life scale (HRQOL), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) severity and improvement scales (CGI-S and CGI-I). Generalized estimating equations tested the association between changes in 4-week cannabis use and improvements in functional outcomes. Classification and regression tree (CART) models were developed to determine what reductions in cannabis use could be used as classifiers of improvement.

Results: Decreases in the amount and frequency of cannabis use were significantly associated with improvements in MPS severity and total scores as well as improvements on the CGI-I and in sleep quality, but not improvements on the HRQOL. CART models performed best for CGI-I scores (72%-75% correct classification), while other outcome measures did not perform as well (40%-62% correct classification). CART models showed improvements on the CGI at 74% reduction in use amounts and 47% reduction in use days.

Conclusions: Reductions in cannabis use (∼50% reduction in use days and ∼75% reduction in use amounts) were associated with clinician-assessed improvement, which suggests that cannabis use reduction may yield benefit among individuals with cannabis use disorder. These exploratory results extract a data-driven metric to inform future studies, clinicians, patients, and policy recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少吸食大麻与改善功能结果的关系:从七项大麻使用障碍治疗试验中提取数据驱动的大麻减量指标的探索性汇总分析。
目的这项探索性分析旨在确定大麻使用量的减少是否与大麻相关问题和功能结果的改善有关,如果有关,减少的百分比与改善的百分比有多大关系:数据来自在美国进行的七项大麻使用障碍治疗试验(N=920;年龄 13 岁及以上;平均年龄 25 岁;女性占 30%,黑人占 7%,西班牙裔/拉丁裔占 11%)。结果测量包括患者报告的大麻问题量表(MPS)、健康相关生活质量量表(HRQOL)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,以及临床医生评定的临床整体印象(CGI)严重程度和改善程度量表(CGI-S 和 CGI-I)。广义估计方程检验了 4 周大麻使用量变化与功能结果改善之间的关联。建立了分类和回归树(CART)模型,以确定大麻使用量的减少情况可作为病情改善的分类指标:结果:大麻使用量和频率的减少与 MPS 严重程度和总分的改善、CGI-I 和睡眠质量的改善显著相关,但与 HRQOL 的改善无关。CART 模型在 CGI-I 评分方面表现最佳(分类正确率为 72%-75% ),而在其他结果测量方面表现不佳(分类正确率为 40%-62% )。CART 模型显示,在 CGI 方面,使用量减少了 74%,使用天数减少了 47%:结论:大麻使用量的减少(使用天数减少 50%,使用量减少 75%)与临床医生评估的病情改善有关,这表明减少大麻使用可能会给大麻使用障碍患者带来益处。这些探索性结果提取了一种数据驱动的衡量标准,为今后的研究、临床医生、患者和政策建议提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychiatry, dedicated to keeping psychiatry vibrant and relevant, publishes the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The journal covers the full spectrum of issues related to mental health diagnoses and treatment, presenting original articles on new developments in diagnosis, treatment, neuroscience, and patient populations.
期刊最新文献
Association of Cannabis Use Reduction With Improved Functional Outcomes: An Exploratory Aggregated Analysis From Seven Cannabis Use Disorder Treatment Trials to Extract Data-Driven Cannabis Reduction Metrics. Association of Neuromelanin-Sensitive MRI Signal With Lifetime Substance Use in Young Women. Genetic Heterogeneity Across Dimensions of Alcohol Use Behaviors. The Neurocircuitry of Substance Use Disorder, Treatment, and Change: A Resource for Clinical Psychiatrists. 12-month Prevalence Estimates of Substance Use Disorders Using DSM-5 Versus DSM-IV Criteria Among U.S. Nonelderly Adults With Substance Use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1