Describing the current landscape of pass/fail grading schemes within skills-based pharmacy curricula

Abstract

Introduction

Optimal methods for grading students in skills-based courses within pharmacy education have not been fully explored. This research aimed to assess the current landscape of pass/fail grading schemes within pharmacy skills-based courses and explore faculty perceptions of pass/fail grading schemes.

Methods

A 29-item, cross-sectional survey was electronically distributed to the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Laboratory Special Interest Group. The survey collected demographics, course grading schemes, faculty perceptions of student performance, and impact of implementing pass/fail grading schemes. Survey respondents were also invited to participate in semi-structured interviews, which were summarized due to limited participation. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of survey data.

Results

Fifty-five participants responded to the survey, representing 23 pharmacy institutions. Most respondents (82 %) used a traditional grading system for final course grades in skills-based courses. Some respondents (40 %) used specification grading for skills assessment, and 64 % of respondents used pass/fail grading to assess specific skills. Most respondents perceived that the change to pass/fail grading either improved or made no difference in faculty workload, wellbeing, general faculty creativity, quality of feedback, timeliness of grading, grade grievances, and faculty preparation time. The main concern was decreased student motivation and engagement. Semi-structured interviews identified a need for specific, validated rubrics, importance of faculty buy-in, and lack of impact on faculty workload as a result of the change. Concerns about residency placement and student motivation were also identified.

Conclusion

There is variability in grading schemes used within skills-based pharmacy curricula. Faculty perceptions of pass/fail grading schemes are positive overall. Considering the limited number of institutions utilizing this grading scheme, additional research is needed.