Heather James, Sophie Smith, Dheeraj Rai, Iryna Culpin, Katrina Turner
{"title":"Making decisions about antidepressant use during pregnancy: a qualitative interview study of a sample of women in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Heather James, Sophie Smith, Dheeraj Rai, Iryna Culpin, Katrina Turner","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background An increasing number of pregnant women now take antidepressants. Many pregnant women experience 'decisional conflict' when deciding whether to take antidepressants, but little is known about the attitudes and experiences influencing these decisions. Aim To explore the attitudes and experiences influencing women's decisions about antenatal antidepressant use. Design and setting A qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a sample of UK women who experienced antenatal depression or took antidepressants antenatally within the preceding three years. Method Recruitment adverts were placed by a perinatal mental health charity and on parenting forums and social media platforms, resulting in a convenience sample. Interview data was coded and analysed with thematic analysis using QSR NVivo. Results Twenty-two women were interviewed; half had taken antidepressants during pregnancy. Most women had concerns about adverse effects and viewed antidepressants as adjunctive to non-pharmacological treatments, which were reported as difficult to access. Some women reported that professional advice was insufficiently detailed. Women described the need to cope with their symptoms, their baby, and existing responsibilities, and related their decisions to their perceived ability to cope. This perception was influenced by physical and emotional challenges relating to pregnancy. Women's decisions were influenced by their previous experiences and by the perceived societal expectations placed on pregnant women. Conclusion Decision-making is a complex and dynamic process, personal to each woman's circumstances. Perceived ability to cope is an important factor in decision-making. Detailed information should be offered to women to support with decision-making in relation to antenatal medication use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background An increasing number of pregnant women now take antidepressants. Many pregnant women experience 'decisional conflict' when deciding whether to take antidepressants, but little is known about the attitudes and experiences influencing these decisions. Aim To explore the attitudes and experiences influencing women's decisions about antenatal antidepressant use. Design and setting A qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a sample of UK women who experienced antenatal depression or took antidepressants antenatally within the preceding three years. Method Recruitment adverts were placed by a perinatal mental health charity and on parenting forums and social media platforms, resulting in a convenience sample. Interview data was coded and analysed with thematic analysis using QSR NVivo. Results Twenty-two women were interviewed; half had taken antidepressants during pregnancy. Most women had concerns about adverse effects and viewed antidepressants as adjunctive to non-pharmacological treatments, which were reported as difficult to access. Some women reported that professional advice was insufficiently detailed. Women described the need to cope with their symptoms, their baby, and existing responsibilities, and related their decisions to their perceived ability to cope. This perception was influenced by physical and emotional challenges relating to pregnancy. Women's decisions were influenced by their previous experiences and by the perceived societal expectations placed on pregnant women. Conclusion Decision-making is a complex and dynamic process, personal to each woman's circumstances. Perceived ability to cope is an important factor in decision-making. Detailed information should be offered to women to support with decision-making in relation to antenatal medication use.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.