Making decisions about antidepressant use during pregnancy: a qualitative interview study of a sample of women in the United Kingdom.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0068
Heather James, Sophie Smith, Dheeraj Rai, Iryna Culpin, Katrina Turner
{"title":"Making decisions about antidepressant use during pregnancy: a qualitative interview study of a sample of women in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Heather James, Sophie Smith, Dheeraj Rai, Iryna Culpin, Katrina Turner","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background An increasing number of pregnant women now take antidepressants. Many pregnant women experience 'decisional conflict' when deciding whether to take antidepressants, but little is known about the attitudes and experiences influencing these decisions. Aim To explore the attitudes and experiences influencing women's decisions about antenatal antidepressant use. Design and setting A qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a sample of UK women who experienced antenatal depression or took antidepressants antenatally within the preceding three years. Method Recruitment adverts were placed by a perinatal mental health charity and on parenting forums and social media platforms, resulting in a convenience sample. Interview data was coded and analysed with thematic analysis using QSR NVivo. Results Twenty-two women were interviewed; half had taken antidepressants during pregnancy. Most women had concerns about adverse effects and viewed antidepressants as adjunctive to non-pharmacological treatments, which were reported as difficult to access. Some women reported that professional advice was insufficiently detailed. Women described the need to cope with their symptoms, their baby, and existing responsibilities, and related their decisions to their perceived ability to cope. This perception was influenced by physical and emotional challenges relating to pregnancy. Women's decisions were influenced by their previous experiences and by the perceived societal expectations placed on pregnant women. Conclusion Decision-making is a complex and dynamic process, personal to each woman's circumstances. Perceived ability to cope is an important factor in decision-making. Detailed information should be offered to women to support with decision-making in relation to antenatal medication use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background An increasing number of pregnant women now take antidepressants. Many pregnant women experience 'decisional conflict' when deciding whether to take antidepressants, but little is known about the attitudes and experiences influencing these decisions. Aim To explore the attitudes and experiences influencing women's decisions about antenatal antidepressant use. Design and setting A qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a sample of UK women who experienced antenatal depression or took antidepressants antenatally within the preceding three years. Method Recruitment adverts were placed by a perinatal mental health charity and on parenting forums and social media platforms, resulting in a convenience sample. Interview data was coded and analysed with thematic analysis using QSR NVivo. Results Twenty-two women were interviewed; half had taken antidepressants during pregnancy. Most women had concerns about adverse effects and viewed antidepressants as adjunctive to non-pharmacological treatments, which were reported as difficult to access. Some women reported that professional advice was insufficiently detailed. Women described the need to cope with their symptoms, their baby, and existing responsibilities, and related their decisions to their perceived ability to cope. This perception was influenced by physical and emotional challenges relating to pregnancy. Women's decisions were influenced by their previous experiences and by the perceived societal expectations placed on pregnant women. Conclusion Decision-making is a complex and dynamic process, personal to each woman's circumstances. Perceived ability to cope is an important factor in decision-making. Detailed information should be offered to women to support with decision-making in relation to antenatal medication use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕期使用抗抑郁药的决策:对英国妇女样本的定性访谈研究。
背景 现在越来越多的孕妇服用抗抑郁药物。许多孕妇在决定是否服用抗抑郁药时都会遇到 "决策冲突",但人们对影响这些决策的态度和经验却知之甚少。目的 探讨影响妇女决定产前服用抗抑郁药的态度和经验。设计和环境 对英国产前抑郁或在产前三年内服用过抗抑郁药的妇女进行深入访谈,对她们进行定性研究。方法 一家围产期心理健康慈善机构在育儿论坛和社交媒体平台上发布了招募广告,从而获得了一个便利样本。使用 QSR NVivo 对访谈数据进行编码和主题分析。结果 22 名妇女接受了访谈;其中一半在怀孕期间服用过抗抑郁药。大多数妇女担心抗抑郁药会产生不良反应,并将其视为非药物治疗的辅助手段,而据报告,非药物治疗很难获得。一些妇女报告说,专业建议不够详细。妇女们表示需要应对自己的症状、孩子和现有的责任,并将自己的决定与她们认为的应对能力联系起来。这种认识受到与怀孕有关的身体和情绪挑战的影响。妇女的决定受到其以往经验和社会对孕妇期望的影响。结论 决策是一个复杂和动态的过程,每个妇女的情况都不尽相同。所认为的应对能力是影响决策的一个重要因素。应向妇女提供详细信息,以帮助她们做出与产前用药相关的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme uptake, patient satisfaction, and QOF achievement: an ecological study from 2020-2023. Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020). Improving personal continuity in general practice: a focus group study. The association between cancer risk assessment tool use and GP consultation duration: an observational study. Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1