Primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability: a probability sample survey.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0056
Samuel J Tromans, Lucy Teece, Rohit Shankar, Angela Hassiotis, Traolach Brugha, Sally McManus
{"title":"Primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability: a probability sample survey.","authors":"Samuel J Tromans, Lucy Teece, Rohit Shankar, Angela Hassiotis, Traolach Brugha, Sally McManus","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with learning disability face multiple adversities, but evidence on their needs and primary care experiences is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the characteristics and primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This was an analysis of the 2022 General Practice Patient Survey, a national probability sample survey conducted in 2022 with people registered with NHS primary care in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This analysis reports descriptive profiles, weighted and with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression models adjusting for gender, age, ethnicity, and area-level deprivation compared experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey participants comprised 623 157 people aged ≥16 years, including 6711 reporting learning disability. Adults reporting learning disability were more likely to be male, younger, of mixed or multiple ethnicities, and live in more deprived areas. All chronic conditions included in the survey were more common in adults reporting learning disability, especially reported sensory, neurodevelopmental, neurological, and mental health conditions. Adults reporting learning disability were twice as likely to have a preferred GP, and less likely to find their practice's website easy to navigate. They were also less likely to have confidence and trust in their healthcare professional, or feel their needs were met.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adults reporting a learning disability had a higher likelihood of chronic health conditions. Their reported experiences of primary care indicate that, despite recent initiatives to improve services offered, further adaptations to the consistency and ease of access to primary care is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adults with learning disability face multiple adversities, but evidence on their needs and primary care experiences is limited.

Aim: To compare the characteristics and primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not.

Design and setting: This was an analysis of the 2022 General Practice Patient Survey, a national probability sample survey conducted in 2022 with people registered with NHS primary care in England.

Method: This analysis reports descriptive profiles, weighted and with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression models adjusting for gender, age, ethnicity, and area-level deprivation compared experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not.

Results: Survey participants comprised 623 157 people aged ≥16 years, including 6711 reporting learning disability. Adults reporting learning disability were more likely to be male, younger, of mixed or multiple ethnicities, and live in more deprived areas. All chronic conditions included in the survey were more common in adults reporting learning disability, especially reported sensory, neurodevelopmental, neurological, and mental health conditions. Adults reporting learning disability were twice as likely to have a preferred GP, and less likely to find their practice's website easy to navigate. They were also less likely to have confidence and trust in their healthcare professional, or feel their needs were met.

Conclusion: Adults reporting a learning disability had a higher likelihood of chronic health conditions. Their reported experiences of primary care indicate that, despite recent initiatives to improve services offered, further adaptations to the consistency and ease of access to primary care is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报告有学习障碍的成年人的初级保健经验:概率抽样调查。
背景 有学习障碍的成年人面临多重困境,但有关他们的需求和初级保健经验的证据却很有限。目的 比较报告有学习障碍的成年人和没有报告有学习障碍的成年人的特征和初级保健经历。设计和设置 对 2022 年全科患者调查进行分析,该调查是一项全国性概率抽样调查,于 2022 年在英格兰国家医疗服务体系初级医疗机构登记。方法 本分析报告了描述性概况、加权和 95% 置信区间。调整性别、年龄、种族和地区贫困程度的逻辑回归模型比较了报告有学习障碍的成年人和没有报告有学习障碍的成年人的经历。结果 调查参与者包括 623 157 名 16 岁或以上的人,其中有 6711 人报告有学习障碍。报告有学习障碍的成年人更有可能是男性、更年轻、混血或多种族,并且居住在更贫困的地区。调查中包括的所有慢性病在报告有学习障碍的成年人中都更为常见,尤其是报告有感官、神经发育、神经和精神健康病症的成年人。报告有学习障碍的成年人拥有首选全科医生的可能性是其他成年人的两倍,而他们认为自己诊所的网站易于浏览的可能性较低。他们也不太可能对自己的医疗保健专业人员充满信心和信任,或认为自己的需求得到了满足。结论 有学习障碍的成年人更有可能患有慢性疾病。他们报告的初级保健经历表明,尽管最近采取了一些措施来改善所提供的服务,但仍需要进一步调整初级保健的一致性和便捷性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Lived experiences of end-of-life care at home in the UK: a scoping review of qualitative research. What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Challenges to quality in contemporary, hybrid general practice: a multi-site longitudinal case study. Primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability: a probability sample survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1