{"title":"Current urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories towards the 2023 EFLM European urinalysis guideline.","authors":"Lieve Van Hoovels, Bénédicte Vanhove, An-Sofie Decavele, Arnaud Capron, Matthijs Oyaert","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2024.2414155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>We aimed to investigate routine urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories and verify these findings against the 2023 European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) European Urinalysis Guideline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed to collect information on pre- to postanalytical aspects of urine test strip and particle analysis. The questionnaire was distributed by Sciensano to all Belgian laboratories, licensed to perform urine particle analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six percent of the Belgian laboratories (75/113) participated. The responding laboratories served physicians in private (25%), hospital (60%) and university hospital (15%) setting. All laboratories performed test strip and particle analysis, predominantly automatically (97% and 96%, respectively). In addition, most laboratories (87%) used intelligent verification criteria to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Almost all laboratories (≥90%) screened and reported a minimal biochemistry panel (glucose, protein, pH, ketones) and particle count (red and white blood cells). Independent of the technology, a notable variability was observed regarding medical cut-off values and advanced particle differentiation and reporting. Internal quality control was extensively performed for urine test strip (91%) and particle analysis (96%), while external QC was less common (32% and 36%, respectively). Consequently, only few laboratories were ISO15189 accredited for urine test strip (15%) and particle analysis (17%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is considerable variability in current urinalysis performed in Belgian laboratories. The 2023 EFLM urinalysis guideline has the potential to guide clinical laboratories towards improving their urinalysis practices. Additional efforts are required to implement these recommendations into clinical practice in Belgium.</p>","PeriodicalId":48865,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2024.2414155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives/background: We aimed to investigate routine urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories and verify these findings against the 2023 European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) European Urinalysis Guideline.
Methods: A questionnaire was developed to collect information on pre- to postanalytical aspects of urine test strip and particle analysis. The questionnaire was distributed by Sciensano to all Belgian laboratories, licensed to perform urine particle analysis.
Results: Sixty-six percent of the Belgian laboratories (75/113) participated. The responding laboratories served physicians in private (25%), hospital (60%) and university hospital (15%) setting. All laboratories performed test strip and particle analysis, predominantly automatically (97% and 96%, respectively). In addition, most laboratories (87%) used intelligent verification criteria to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Almost all laboratories (≥90%) screened and reported a minimal biochemistry panel (glucose, protein, pH, ketones) and particle count (red and white blood cells). Independent of the technology, a notable variability was observed regarding medical cut-off values and advanced particle differentiation and reporting. Internal quality control was extensively performed for urine test strip (91%) and particle analysis (96%), while external QC was less common (32% and 36%, respectively). Consequently, only few laboratories were ISO15189 accredited for urine test strip (15%) and particle analysis (17%).
Conclusion: There is considerable variability in current urinalysis performed in Belgian laboratories. The 2023 EFLM urinalysis guideline has the potential to guide clinical laboratories towards improving their urinalysis practices. Additional efforts are required to implement these recommendations into clinical practice in Belgium.
期刊介绍:
Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.