Novel, Group-Based Trajectories of Labor Progress in Nulliparous Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies

Lisa M. Wesolowski, Janet Catov, Jill R. Demirci, Dianxu Ren, Yvette P. Conley
{"title":"Novel, Group-Based Trajectories of Labor Progress in Nulliparous Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies","authors":"Lisa M. Wesolowski,&nbsp;Janet Catov,&nbsp;Jill R. Demirci,&nbsp;Dianxu Ren,&nbsp;Yvette P. Conley","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize labor progress among nulliparous women by applying group-based trajectory analysis and examining predictors of group membership.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>An existing biobank and database from a birth hospital in Western Pennsylvania.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation with singleton fetuses in vertex presentation (<em>N</em> = 401).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We characterized labor progress by applying group-based trajectory analysis. We conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis to examine the relationships among labor trajectory groups and various demographic and clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified three trajectories of labor in the group-based trajectory analyses: precipitously progressing (<em>n</em> = 76, 20.1%), average (<em>n</em> = 245, 59.1%), and slow progress (<em>n</em> = 80, 20.7%). Only gestational age at birth significantly predicted trajectory group membership, and an increased gestational age was associated with greater odds of belonging to the slower progress group (<em>OR</em> = 1.43, 95% CI [1.06, 1.92]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We identified multiple trajectories of labor progress in a sample of nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation. Gestational age may help predict the trajectory of labor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 669-678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524002922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize labor progress among nulliparous women by applying group-based trajectory analysis and examining predictors of group membership.

Design

Retrospective observational.

Setting

An existing biobank and database from a birth hospital in Western Pennsylvania.

Participants

Nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation with singleton fetuses in vertex presentation (N = 401).

Methods

We characterized labor progress by applying group-based trajectory analysis. We conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis to examine the relationships among labor trajectory groups and various demographic and clinical variables.

Results

We identified three trajectories of labor in the group-based trajectory analyses: precipitously progressing (n = 76, 20.1%), average (n = 245, 59.1%), and slow progress (n = 80, 20.7%). Only gestational age at birth significantly predicted trajectory group membership, and an increased gestational age was associated with greater odds of belonging to the slower progress group (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.06, 1.92]).

Conclusion

We identified multiple trajectories of labor progress in a sample of nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation. Gestational age may help predict the trajectory of labor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新颖的、基于群体的低危孕妇分娩进展轨迹。
目的通过应用基于组别的轨迹分析和研究组别成员的预测因素,描述无产钳产妇的分娩进展情况:设计:回顾性观察:环境:宾夕法尼亚州西部一家分娩医院的现有生物库和数据库:方法: 我们采用分组分析法来描述分娩过程:方法:我们采用基于群体的轨迹分析来描述分娩过程。我们进行了多项式逻辑回归分析,以研究分娩轨迹分组与各种人口统计学和临床变量之间的关系:结果:在基于分组的分娩轨迹分析中,我们确定了三种分娩轨迹:急速进展(n = 76,20.1%)、一般进展(n = 245,59.1%)和缓慢进展(n = 80,20.7%)。只有出生时的胎龄能明显预测分娩轨迹组别,胎龄越大,属于进展缓慢组别的几率越大(OR = 1.43,95% CI [1.06,1.92]):结论:我们在低危妊娠、足月妊娠的无阴道产妇样本中发现了多种分娩进展轨迹。妊娠年龄可能有助于预测分娩的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Case Report of Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications. Secondary Qualitative Analysis of Stigmatizing and Nonstigmatizing Language Used in Hospital Birth Settings. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Nurse Perceptions of Barriers to Infection Prevention and Control in Labor and Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1