Lisa M. Wesolowski, Janet Catov, Jill R. Demirci, Dianxu Ren, Yvette P. Conley
{"title":"Novel, Group-Based Trajectories of Labor Progress in Nulliparous Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies","authors":"Lisa M. Wesolowski, Janet Catov, Jill R. Demirci, Dianxu Ren, Yvette P. Conley","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize labor progress among nulliparous women by applying group-based trajectory analysis and examining predictors of group membership.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>An existing biobank and database from a birth hospital in Western Pennsylvania.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation with singleton fetuses in vertex presentation (<em>N</em> = 401).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We characterized labor progress by applying group-based trajectory analysis. We conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis to examine the relationships among labor trajectory groups and various demographic and clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified three trajectories of labor in the group-based trajectory analyses: precipitously progressing (<em>n</em> = 76, 20.1%), average (<em>n</em> = 245, 59.1%), and slow progress (<em>n</em> = 80, 20.7%). Only gestational age at birth significantly predicted trajectory group membership, and an increased gestational age was associated with greater odds of belonging to the slower progress group (<em>OR</em> = 1.43, 95% CI [1.06, 1.92]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We identified multiple trajectories of labor progress in a sample of nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation. Gestational age may help predict the trajectory of labor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 669-678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524002922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To characterize labor progress among nulliparous women by applying group-based trajectory analysis and examining predictors of group membership.
Design
Retrospective observational.
Setting
An existing biobank and database from a birth hospital in Western Pennsylvania.
Participants
Nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation with singleton fetuses in vertex presentation (N = 401).
Methods
We characterized labor progress by applying group-based trajectory analysis. We conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis to examine the relationships among labor trajectory groups and various demographic and clinical variables.
Results
We identified three trajectories of labor in the group-based trajectory analyses: precipitously progressing (n = 76, 20.1%), average (n = 245, 59.1%), and slow progress (n = 80, 20.7%). Only gestational age at birth significantly predicted trajectory group membership, and an increased gestational age was associated with greater odds of belonging to the slower progress group (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.06, 1.92]).
Conclusion
We identified multiple trajectories of labor progress in a sample of nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies at term gestation. Gestational age may help predict the trajectory of labor.
期刊介绍:
JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.