Lower-Extremity Kinematics and Spatiotemporal Differences Between Normal Walking and Walking While Maintaining Weapon Aim

Maria K. Talarico, Jennifer N. Sperlein, Jingzhen Yang, Ajit Chaudhari, James A. Oñate
{"title":"Lower-Extremity Kinematics and Spatiotemporal Differences Between Normal Walking and Walking While Maintaining Weapon Aim","authors":"Maria K. Talarico,&nbsp;Jennifer N. Sperlein,&nbsp;Jingzhen Yang,&nbsp;Ajit Chaudhari,&nbsp;James A. Oñate","doi":"10.1007/s41133-024-00073-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although exoskeletons for tactical athletes are potentially beneficial tools to increase survivability and enhance operational capabilities, they often do not account for variations from basic movements. Tactical movement patterns must be investigated to best guide device design and mitigate restriction of the user’s abilities to execute duties. The purpose of this study was to identify if biomechanical patterns are difference between walking while maintaining weapon aim (i.e., ‘shoot on the move’, SM) and normal walking. Twenty-two male active-duty Army Soldiers performed normal walking and SM under three speed conditions: (1) self-selected slow, (2) standard (1.12 m/s), and (3) self-selected fast. Lower extremity kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters were collected. Unadjusted and adjusted models were performed to determine the effects of walking and speed conditions on dependent variables. Individuals exhibited larger lower extremity flexion angles during SM than during normal walking (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Smaller strides were observed during SM than during normal walking (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). No difference in time spent in double limb support were observed between walking tasks (<i>p</i> = 0.97). Tactical athletes exhibit different movement patterns during SM compared to normal walking. Lower extremities are more flexed, and strides are shorter during SM to minimize vertical movement and increase stability, suggesting that occupationally relevant movements may not directly translate to basic movements. Information on occupationally relevant movements should be accessible to exoskeleton designers to build optimum control systems that will aid and not hinder tactical athletes in their roles to serve and protect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100147,"journal":{"name":"Augmented Human Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmented Human Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41133-024-00073-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although exoskeletons for tactical athletes are potentially beneficial tools to increase survivability and enhance operational capabilities, they often do not account for variations from basic movements. Tactical movement patterns must be investigated to best guide device design and mitigate restriction of the user’s abilities to execute duties. The purpose of this study was to identify if biomechanical patterns are difference between walking while maintaining weapon aim (i.e., ‘shoot on the move’, SM) and normal walking. Twenty-two male active-duty Army Soldiers performed normal walking and SM under three speed conditions: (1) self-selected slow, (2) standard (1.12 m/s), and (3) self-selected fast. Lower extremity kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters were collected. Unadjusted and adjusted models were performed to determine the effects of walking and speed conditions on dependent variables. Individuals exhibited larger lower extremity flexion angles during SM than during normal walking (p < 0.01). Smaller strides were observed during SM than during normal walking (p < 0.01). No difference in time spent in double limb support were observed between walking tasks (p = 0.97). Tactical athletes exhibit different movement patterns during SM compared to normal walking. Lower extremities are more flexed, and strides are shorter during SM to minimize vertical movement and increase stability, suggesting that occupationally relevant movements may not directly translate to basic movements. Information on occupationally relevant movements should be accessible to exoskeleton designers to build optimum control systems that will aid and not hinder tactical athletes in their roles to serve and protect.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常行走和保持武器瞄准时行走的下肢运动学和时空差异
尽管用于战术运动员的外骨骼是提高生存能力和增强作战能力的潜在有利工具,但它们往往没有考虑到基本动作的变化。必须对战术运动模式进行调查,以便为设备设计提供最佳指导,并减少对用户执行任务能力的限制。本研究旨在确定在保持武器瞄准状态下行走(即 "移动中射击",SM)与正常行走之间的生物力学模式是否存在差异。22 名男性现役陆军士兵在三种速度条件下进行了正常行走和 "移动中射击":(1) 自选慢速;(2) 标准(1.12 米/秒);(3) 自选快速。收集了下肢运动学和时空参数。通过未调整和调整模型来确定步行和速度条件对因变量的影响。与正常行走相比,SM 时个体的下肢屈曲角度更大(p < 0.01)。与正常行走相比,SM 时的步幅更小(p < 0.01)。在不同的行走任务中,双肢支撑所花费的时间没有差异(p = 0.97)。与正常行走相比,战术运动员在 SM 期间表现出不同的运动模式。在SM期间,下肢更加弯曲,步幅更短,以尽量减少垂直运动并增加稳定性,这表明与职业相关的动作可能不会直接转化为基本动作。外骨骼设计人员应能获得与职业相关的动作信息,以建立最佳的控制系统,帮助而不是阻碍战术运动员履行服务和保护的职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Haptic Gamer Suit for Enhancing VR Games Experience Retraction Note: Application on Virtual Reality for Enhanced Education Learning, Military Training and Sports The Impact of Transferring Embodiment and Work Efficiency Between Natural Body and Modular Body Systems Smart Life Saver Jacket: A New Jacket to Support CPR Operation Unraveling the Ethical Conundrum of Artificial Intelligence: A Synthesis of Literature and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1