Liminality in customer experiences: The uncertain outcome of employing liminal spaces for customer escapism

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115003
Jonas Holmqvist, Frédéric Ponsignon
{"title":"Liminality in customer experiences: The uncertain outcome of employing liminal spaces for customer escapism","authors":"Jonas Holmqvist,&nbsp;Frédéric Ponsignon","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Liminality is a key concept for understanding escapism, which typically occurs in liminal spaces. However, while escapism in customer experiences has been widely studied, little research examines liminality. Extant research mainly focuses on escapism as a positive outcome, yet liminality concept in its original conceptualization is ambiguous and uncertain and may also result in negative experiences. This is the research gap this paper addresses; through an in-depth study at a luxury brand’s experience center, our findings shed light on how the use of liminal spaces may result in positive or negative experiences. Challenging the focus of the dominant literature on positive experiences, we recognize that liminality can lead to positive outcomes but contribute to the experience literature by first showing how employing liminal spaces can backfire, then analyzing the factors explaining how and when liminality can lead to negative outcomes, and finally identifying how service providers can limit this risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 115003"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005071","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liminality is a key concept for understanding escapism, which typically occurs in liminal spaces. However, while escapism in customer experiences has been widely studied, little research examines liminality. Extant research mainly focuses on escapism as a positive outcome, yet liminality concept in its original conceptualization is ambiguous and uncertain and may also result in negative experiences. This is the research gap this paper addresses; through an in-depth study at a luxury brand’s experience center, our findings shed light on how the use of liminal spaces may result in positive or negative experiences. Challenging the focus of the dominant literature on positive experiences, we recognize that liminality can lead to positive outcomes but contribute to the experience literature by first showing how employing liminal spaces can backfire, then analyzing the factors explaining how and when liminality can lead to negative outcomes, and finally identifying how service providers can limit this risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顾客体验的极限性:利用边缘空间逃避顾客的不确定结果
边缘性是理解逃避现实的一个关键概念,逃避现实通常发生在边缘空间。然而,尽管对顾客体验中的逃避现实现象进行了广泛的研究,但很少有研究对边缘性进行探讨。现有研究主要关注作为积极结果的逃避现实,然而边缘性概念在其最初的概念化中是模糊和不确定的,也可能导致负面体验。这正是本文所要解决的研究空白;通过对一个奢侈品牌体验中心的深入研究,我们的发现揭示了边缘空间的使用如何可能带来积极或消极的体验。我们挑战了主流文献对积极体验的关注,认识到边缘性可以带来积极的结果,但通过首先展示使用边缘空间如何会适得其反,然后分析解释边缘性如何以及何时会导致消极结果的因素,最后确定服务提供商如何限制这种风险,从而为体验文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1