Hongyong Xiang , Xiang Li , Rui Xiao , Jie Chen , Wentao Dai
{"title":"Is dredging an effective ecological restoration method to improve water quality in freshwater ecosystems?","authors":"Hongyong Xiang , Xiang Li , Rui Xiao , Jie Chen , Wentao Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sediment dredging has been widely applied worldwide as a pivotal pollution-mitigation method, and facilitating the restoration of biological communities and ecosystem functions and services. However, there are still some crucial questions remain unclear, including the effectiveness of dredging in improving water quality and how deep should we dredge. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis by examining 71 studies including 800 effect sizes that focus on sediment dredging practices in freshwater ecosystems across China. Our results revealed significant improvement in twelve out of the fourteen assessed water quality indices by sediment dredging except for pH and total organic carbon in sediment (TOC_sediment). Specifically, we found increasing in dissolved oxygen, TOC_sediment, and transparency by 3.30 %–24.71 %, while other indices reduced by 8.40 %–38.53 %, suggesting significant improvement of water quality by dredging. Dredging effectiveness varied by many factors including dredging depth, post-dredging time, dredging status, and climatic factors. Dredging depth negatively correlated with the effect sizes of six water quality indices such as total phosphorus (TP) and <span><math><msubsup><mi>NH</mi><mn>4</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup></math></span>, and the recommended dredging depth is 40–60 cm to maximize water quality improvements. Unexpectedly, the effect sizes of total nitrogen (TN), TP, <span><math><msubsup><mi>NH</mi><mn>4</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup></math></span>, chlorophyll-a, and total suspended solids decreased with longer post-dredging time, indicating stronger beneficial of water quality improvement over time. Interestingly, dredging had more profound impacts in waterbodies of higher than lower pollutant concentrations. Combined projects (dredging + other methods), post-dredging, and deeper dredging (>40 cm) consistently improved water quality more than standalone dredging, ongoing-dredging, and shallow dredging depth, respectively. We also found significant effects of climatic factors, experimental type, and dredging quantity on the effectiveness of dredging on water quality. Collectively, our study highlights dredging potential for water quality improvement, especially for reducing concentrations of TN_sediment, TP_sediment, and chlorophyll-a. Such knowledge is fundamental for decision-makers to balance between environmental benefits and cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107425"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sediment dredging has been widely applied worldwide as a pivotal pollution-mitigation method, and facilitating the restoration of biological communities and ecosystem functions and services. However, there are still some crucial questions remain unclear, including the effectiveness of dredging in improving water quality and how deep should we dredge. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis by examining 71 studies including 800 effect sizes that focus on sediment dredging practices in freshwater ecosystems across China. Our results revealed significant improvement in twelve out of the fourteen assessed water quality indices by sediment dredging except for pH and total organic carbon in sediment (TOC_sediment). Specifically, we found increasing in dissolved oxygen, TOC_sediment, and transparency by 3.30 %–24.71 %, while other indices reduced by 8.40 %–38.53 %, suggesting significant improvement of water quality by dredging. Dredging effectiveness varied by many factors including dredging depth, post-dredging time, dredging status, and climatic factors. Dredging depth negatively correlated with the effect sizes of six water quality indices such as total phosphorus (TP) and , and the recommended dredging depth is 40–60 cm to maximize water quality improvements. Unexpectedly, the effect sizes of total nitrogen (TN), TP, , chlorophyll-a, and total suspended solids decreased with longer post-dredging time, indicating stronger beneficial of water quality improvement over time. Interestingly, dredging had more profound impacts in waterbodies of higher than lower pollutant concentrations. Combined projects (dredging + other methods), post-dredging, and deeper dredging (>40 cm) consistently improved water quality more than standalone dredging, ongoing-dredging, and shallow dredging depth, respectively. We also found significant effects of climatic factors, experimental type, and dredging quantity on the effectiveness of dredging on water quality. Collectively, our study highlights dredging potential for water quality improvement, especially for reducing concentrations of TN_sediment, TP_sediment, and chlorophyll-a. Such knowledge is fundamental for decision-makers to balance between environmental benefits and cost.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.