Is dredging an effective ecological restoration method to improve water quality in freshwater ecosystems?

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107425
Hongyong Xiang , Xiang Li , Rui Xiao , Jie Chen , Wentao Dai
{"title":"Is dredging an effective ecological restoration method to improve water quality in freshwater ecosystems?","authors":"Hongyong Xiang ,&nbsp;Xiang Li ,&nbsp;Rui Xiao ,&nbsp;Jie Chen ,&nbsp;Wentao Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sediment dredging has been widely applied worldwide as a pivotal pollution-mitigation method, and facilitating the restoration of biological communities and ecosystem functions and services. However, there are still some crucial questions remain unclear, including the effectiveness of dredging in improving water quality and how deep should we dredge. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis by examining 71 studies including 800 effect sizes that focus on sediment dredging practices in freshwater ecosystems across China. Our results revealed significant improvement in twelve out of the fourteen assessed water quality indices by sediment dredging except for pH and total organic carbon in sediment (TOC_sediment). Specifically, we found increasing in dissolved oxygen, TOC_sediment, and transparency by 3.30 %–24.71 %, while other indices reduced by 8.40 %–38.53 %, suggesting significant improvement of water quality by dredging. Dredging effectiveness varied by many factors including dredging depth, post-dredging time, dredging status, and climatic factors. Dredging depth negatively correlated with the effect sizes of six water quality indices such as total phosphorus (TP) and <span><math><msubsup><mi>NH</mi><mn>4</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup></math></span>, and the recommended dredging depth is 40–60 cm to maximize water quality improvements. Unexpectedly, the effect sizes of total nitrogen (TN), TP, <span><math><msubsup><mi>NH</mi><mn>4</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup></math></span>, chlorophyll-a, and total suspended solids decreased with longer post-dredging time, indicating stronger beneficial of water quality improvement over time. Interestingly, dredging had more profound impacts in waterbodies of higher than lower pollutant concentrations. Combined projects (dredging + other methods), post-dredging, and deeper dredging (&gt;40 cm) consistently improved water quality more than standalone dredging, ongoing-dredging, and shallow dredging depth, respectively. We also found significant effects of climatic factors, experimental type, and dredging quantity on the effectiveness of dredging on water quality. Collectively, our study highlights dredging potential for water quality improvement, especially for reducing concentrations of TN_sediment, TP_sediment, and chlorophyll-a. Such knowledge is fundamental for decision-makers to balance between environmental benefits and cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107425"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sediment dredging has been widely applied worldwide as a pivotal pollution-mitigation method, and facilitating the restoration of biological communities and ecosystem functions and services. However, there are still some crucial questions remain unclear, including the effectiveness of dredging in improving water quality and how deep should we dredge. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis by examining 71 studies including 800 effect sizes that focus on sediment dredging practices in freshwater ecosystems across China. Our results revealed significant improvement in twelve out of the fourteen assessed water quality indices by sediment dredging except for pH and total organic carbon in sediment (TOC_sediment). Specifically, we found increasing in dissolved oxygen, TOC_sediment, and transparency by 3.30 %–24.71 %, while other indices reduced by 8.40 %–38.53 %, suggesting significant improvement of water quality by dredging. Dredging effectiveness varied by many factors including dredging depth, post-dredging time, dredging status, and climatic factors. Dredging depth negatively correlated with the effect sizes of six water quality indices such as total phosphorus (TP) and NH4+, and the recommended dredging depth is 40–60 cm to maximize water quality improvements. Unexpectedly, the effect sizes of total nitrogen (TN), TP, NH4+, chlorophyll-a, and total suspended solids decreased with longer post-dredging time, indicating stronger beneficial of water quality improvement over time. Interestingly, dredging had more profound impacts in waterbodies of higher than lower pollutant concentrations. Combined projects (dredging + other methods), post-dredging, and deeper dredging (>40 cm) consistently improved water quality more than standalone dredging, ongoing-dredging, and shallow dredging depth, respectively. We also found significant effects of climatic factors, experimental type, and dredging quantity on the effectiveness of dredging on water quality. Collectively, our study highlights dredging potential for water quality improvement, especially for reducing concentrations of TN_sediment, TP_sediment, and chlorophyll-a. Such knowledge is fundamental for decision-makers to balance between environmental benefits and cost.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疏浚是改善淡水生态系统水质的有效生态恢复方法吗?
沉积物疏浚作为一种重要的污染缓解方法,在全球范围内得到了广泛应用,并促进了生物群落和生态系统功能与服务的恢复。然而,仍有一些关键问题尚不明确,包括疏浚对改善水质的效果以及疏浚深度。为了解决这些不确定性,我们进行了一项全面的荟萃分析,考察了 71 项研究,包括 800 个效应大小,这些研究主要关注中国淡水生态系统中的沉积物疏浚实践。研究结果表明,除了 pH 值和沉积物中总有机碳(TOC_sediment)外,沉积物疏浚对 14 项评估水质指标中的 12 项均有明显改善。具体而言,我们发现溶解氧、沉积物总有机碳和透明度提高了 3.30%-24.71%,而其他指数降低了 8.40%-38.53%,这表明清淤对水质的改善非常明显。疏浚效果受多种因素影响,包括疏浚深度、疏浚后时间、疏浚状态和气候因素。疏浚深度与总磷(TP)和 NH4+ 等六项水质指标的效应大小呈负相关,建议的疏浚深度为 40-60 厘米,以最大限度地改善水质。出乎意料的是,总氮 (TN)、总磷 (TP)、NH4+、叶绿素-a 和总悬浮固体的效应大小随着清淤后时间的延长而减小,这表明随着时间的推移,清淤对水质改善的益处更大。有趣的是,疏浚工程对污染物浓度较高的水体的影响比对污染物浓度较低的水体的影响更大。联合项目(疏浚+其他方法)、疏浚后和较深的疏浚(40 厘米)分别比单独疏浚、持续疏浚和较浅的疏浚深度更能持续改善水质。我们还发现,气候因素、实验类型和清淤量对清淤对水质的影响也很明显。总之,我们的研究强调了清淤在改善水质方面的潜力,尤其是在降低 TN_沉积物、TP_沉积物和叶绿素-a 的浓度方面。这些知识对于决策者平衡环境效益和成本至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Effects of restorative treatments confirmed in a restored pond Living in a material world: Support for the use of natural and alternative materials in coastal restoration and living shorelines Editorial Board Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy Are floating mangrove breakwaters effective for wave attenuation? - A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1