Assessing the restoration and the dispersal of reindeer lichen after forest fire in northern Sweden: Results after eleven growing seasons

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107415
Samuel Roturier , Joel Jensen , Lars-Evert Nutti , Pierre Barbillon , Sébastien Ollier , Dan Bergström
{"title":"Assessing the restoration and the dispersal of reindeer lichen after forest fire in northern Sweden: Results after eleven growing seasons","authors":"Samuel Roturier ,&nbsp;Joel Jensen ,&nbsp;Lars-Evert Nutti ,&nbsp;Pierre Barbillon ,&nbsp;Sébastien Ollier ,&nbsp;Dan Bergström","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In circumboreal regions, <em>Rangifer</em> populations depend heavily on ground reindeer lichens (<em>Cladonia</em> subgenus <em>Cladina</em>) during the winter, but this critical resource was depleted over the 20th century as a result of land encroachment and habitat loss. Fires, both wild and controlled, can also contribute to the decline of reindeer lichen. Depending on the context, accelerating the return of winter pasture through reindeer lichen transplantation after fire may be needed to conserve threatened caribou populations and semi-domestic reindeer herding. Following a field experiment established in 2008, two years after a forest fire, we evaluated the success of restoration through lichen transplantation, measuring biomass on restoration, control and reference sites. We also assessed the dispersal of lichen fragments from the restoration plots into the surrounding burnt area. Eleven growing seasons after lichen transplantation, the lichen biomass measured on restoration sites (62 g m<sup>−2</sup>) was on average significantly higher than on control sites (0.8 g m<sup>−2</sup>), but remained non-significantly lower than on reference sites (109 g m<sup>−2</sup>). This confirms the success of the transplanting operation and the remaining progress towards a fully restored lichen mat. The distance distribution of lichen fragments showed that reindeer lichen had dispersed by at least 20 m from the restoration plots, and locally by much greater distances, of up to 60 m. The absence of a clear pattern of dispersal on all sites indicates the importance of microsite conditions and post-dispersal processes. Perspectives for future restoration operations are discussed, including the fire-lichen-<em>Rangifer</em> relationship, and implications for local and Indigenous populations who depend on them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In circumboreal regions, Rangifer populations depend heavily on ground reindeer lichens (Cladonia subgenus Cladina) during the winter, but this critical resource was depleted over the 20th century as a result of land encroachment and habitat loss. Fires, both wild and controlled, can also contribute to the decline of reindeer lichen. Depending on the context, accelerating the return of winter pasture through reindeer lichen transplantation after fire may be needed to conserve threatened caribou populations and semi-domestic reindeer herding. Following a field experiment established in 2008, two years after a forest fire, we evaluated the success of restoration through lichen transplantation, measuring biomass on restoration, control and reference sites. We also assessed the dispersal of lichen fragments from the restoration plots into the surrounding burnt area. Eleven growing seasons after lichen transplantation, the lichen biomass measured on restoration sites (62 g m−2) was on average significantly higher than on control sites (0.8 g m−2), but remained non-significantly lower than on reference sites (109 g m−2). This confirms the success of the transplanting operation and the remaining progress towards a fully restored lichen mat. The distance distribution of lichen fragments showed that reindeer lichen had dispersed by at least 20 m from the restoration plots, and locally by much greater distances, of up to 60 m. The absence of a clear pattern of dispersal on all sites indicates the importance of microsite conditions and post-dispersal processes. Perspectives for future restoration operations are discussed, including the fire-lichen-Rangifer relationship, and implications for local and Indigenous populations who depend on them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估瑞典北部森林火灾后驯鹿地衣的恢复和传播情况:十一个生长季节后的结果
在环太平洋地区,驯鹿种群在冬季主要依靠地面驯鹿地衣(Cladonia 亚属 Cladina)过冬,但 20 世纪以来,由于土地侵占和栖息地丧失,这一重要资源已经枯竭。野火和受控火灾也会导致驯鹿地衣的减少。根据具体情况,可能需要在火灾后通过移植驯鹿地衣加快冬季牧场的恢复,以保护濒临灭绝的驯鹿种群和半家养驯鹿放牧。2008 年,在森林火灾发生两年后,我们进行了一次实地实验,通过测量恢复点、对照点和参照点的生物量,评估了地衣移植恢复的成功率。我们还评估了地衣碎片从恢复地块扩散到周围烧毁区域的情况。地衣移植后的 11 个生长季,在恢复地测得的地衣生物量(62 克/平方米-2)平均明显高于对照地(0.8 克/平方米-2),但仍明显低于参照地(109 克/平方米-2)。这证实了移植工作的成功,以及在完全恢复地衣垫方面取得的进展。地衣碎片的距离分布表明,驯鹿地衣从恢复地块至少扩散了 20 米,局部地区扩散距离更远,可达 60 米。研究还讨论了未来恢复行动的前景,包括火灾与袋狼的关系,以及对依赖袋狼的当地居民和土著居民的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Effects of restorative treatments confirmed in a restored pond Living in a material world: Support for the use of natural and alternative materials in coastal restoration and living shorelines Editorial Board Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy Are floating mangrove breakwaters effective for wave attenuation? - A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1