Does environmental protection tax impact corporate ESG greenwashing? A quasi-natural experiment in China

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.029
{"title":"Does environmental protection tax impact corporate ESG greenwashing? A quasi-natural experiment in China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The recently implemented environmental protection tax (EPT) policy in China provides the opportunity to conduct a quasi-natural experiment to empirically evaluate environmental regulations’ impact on corporate practices. We adopt the difference-in-differences method to analyze the effect and mechanisms of the EPT on corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) greenwashing based on Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2021. The empirical results show that the EPT drives companies to engage in ESG greenwashing, significantly increasing ESG greenwashing by approximately 13.16 %. The mechanism tests demonstrate that the EPT exerts governance pressure but does not create more resources, making companies more likely to achieve compliance through greenwashing. Furthermore, the effect of the EPT on ESG greenwashing is more pronounced for large companies and those located in regions with high economic development and strong regulatory enforcement. Our study provides solid evidence with valuable implications for improving the EPT policy to achieve green and sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recently implemented environmental protection tax (EPT) policy in China provides the opportunity to conduct a quasi-natural experiment to empirically evaluate environmental regulations’ impact on corporate practices. We adopt the difference-in-differences method to analyze the effect and mechanisms of the EPT on corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) greenwashing based on Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2021. The empirical results show that the EPT drives companies to engage in ESG greenwashing, significantly increasing ESG greenwashing by approximately 13.16 %. The mechanism tests demonstrate that the EPT exerts governance pressure but does not create more resources, making companies more likely to achieve compliance through greenwashing. Furthermore, the effect of the EPT on ESG greenwashing is more pronounced for large companies and those located in regions with high economic development and strong regulatory enforcement. Our study provides solid evidence with valuable implications for improving the EPT policy to achieve green and sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境保护税是否会影响企业的环境、社会和治理(ESG)"洗绿 "行为?中国的准自然实验
中国最近实施的环境保护税(EPT)政策为开展准自然实验以实证评估环境法规对企业行为的影响提供了机会。我们以 2015 年至 2021 年的中国 A 股上市公司为研究对象,采用差分法分析了环保税对企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)"洗绿 "行为的影响及其机制。实证结果表明,EPT促使企业进行ESG绿化,使ESG绿化显著增加约13.16%。机制检验表明,EPT 施加了治理压力,但并没有创造更多资源,使公司更有可能通过 "洗绿 "实现合规。此外,EPT 对 ESG 洗绿的影响对于大公司和位于经济发展水平高、监管执行力度强的地区的公司更为明显。我们的研究为改进 EPT 政策以实现绿色可持续发展提供了可靠的证据和有价值的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
Job Destruction or Job Creation?: Evidence from Carbon Emission Trading Policies Does local government debt promote firm green innovation? Evidence from the Chinese local government debt governance reform Influence of financial inclusion and industrial robots on the efficiency of China's OFDI: A heterogeneous spatial stochastic frontier analysis Rectifying local governments’ strategic environmental enforcement: Can refined air pollution monitoring enhance local air quality in China? Doing good in times of need: Green finance policy and strategic corporate social responsibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1