Reducing life cycle environmental impacts of milk production through precision livestock farming

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.021
{"title":"Reducing life cycle environmental impacts of milk production through precision livestock farming","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, the livestock sector has significantly improved its efficiency, productivity, and environmental sustainability. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) represents a driver in this direction, since it enables to monitor individual animals and herds, and supports the farmer in making better decisions. Although the benefits are clear on a livestock perspective, it is difficult to quantify the environmental benefit of having technology on farm, mostly due to the complexity of collecting data on the same farm before and after a certain solution.</div><div>In this context, this paper focuses on the assessment of the environmental sustainability of a case-study Italian dairy cattle farm where different technologies were installed one by one: first a mechanical ventilation system (MV) and second an automatic milking system (AMS), without introducing other significant changes to the farm management and practices in the meantime. The environmental impact of milk production on the farm was quantified through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method, and the initial farm configuration was compared with the two scenarios in which each technology was incorporated. Fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) was used as Functional Unit, and a cradle to farm gate system boundary and biophysical allocation method were selected. This enabled to provide valuable insights for stakeholders about the effect on the environmental sustainability of the use of the two technologies. The results show that for all the evaluated impact categories there is an environmental benefit of the improved scenarios. The biggest benefit can be observed with the installation of mechanical ventilation, to which correspond benefits in terms of animal health, welfare and productivity. Then, also AMS entails sustainability improvements, mainly linked with increased efficiency and productivity. In conclusion, the use of technology on dairy farms improves not only the farm efficiency and the animal management, but also the environmental sustainability. Furthermore, the rapid technological advancements may further enhance this positive trend in reducing the contribution of livestock farming to the environmental impacts provided that farmers adopt them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924002781","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, the livestock sector has significantly improved its efficiency, productivity, and environmental sustainability. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) represents a driver in this direction, since it enables to monitor individual animals and herds, and supports the farmer in making better decisions. Although the benefits are clear on a livestock perspective, it is difficult to quantify the environmental benefit of having technology on farm, mostly due to the complexity of collecting data on the same farm before and after a certain solution.
In this context, this paper focuses on the assessment of the environmental sustainability of a case-study Italian dairy cattle farm where different technologies were installed one by one: first a mechanical ventilation system (MV) and second an automatic milking system (AMS), without introducing other significant changes to the farm management and practices in the meantime. The environmental impact of milk production on the farm was quantified through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method, and the initial farm configuration was compared with the two scenarios in which each technology was incorporated. Fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) was used as Functional Unit, and a cradle to farm gate system boundary and biophysical allocation method were selected. This enabled to provide valuable insights for stakeholders about the effect on the environmental sustainability of the use of the two technologies. The results show that for all the evaluated impact categories there is an environmental benefit of the improved scenarios. The biggest benefit can be observed with the installation of mechanical ventilation, to which correspond benefits in terms of animal health, welfare and productivity. Then, also AMS entails sustainability improvements, mainly linked with increased efficiency and productivity. In conclusion, the use of technology on dairy farms improves not only the farm efficiency and the animal management, but also the environmental sustainability. Furthermore, the rapid technological advancements may further enhance this positive trend in reducing the contribution of livestock farming to the environmental impacts provided that farmers adopt them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过精准畜牧业减少牛奶生产生命周期对环境的影响
近几十年来,畜牧业的效率、生产力和环境可持续性都有了显著提高。精准畜牧业(PLF)是这一方向的驱动力,因为它能够监测单个牲畜和畜群,帮助农民做出更好的决策。虽然从畜牧业的角度来看,精确畜牧业的好处显而易见,但很难量化在牧场采用技术对环境带来的好处,这主要是由于在采用某种解决方案之前和之后,在同一个牧场收集数据非常复杂。通过生命周期评估(LCA)方法量化了牧场牛奶生产对环境的影响,并将牧场的初始配置与采用每种技术的两种方案进行了比较。使用脂肪和蛋白质校正牛奶(FPCM)作为功能单元,并选择了从摇篮到农场大门的系统边界和生物物理分配方法。这样,利益相关者就能深入了解使用这两种技术对环境可持续性的影响。结果表明,在所有评估的影响类别中,改进方案都具有环境效益。安装机械通风设备的效益最大,动物健康、福利和生产率也相应提高。此外,AMS 还能改善可持续性,主要与提高效率和生产率有关。总之,在奶牛场使用技术不仅能提高牧场效率和动物管理水平,还能改善环境的可持续性。此外,快速的技术进步可能会进一步加强这一积极趋势,减少畜牧业对环境的影响,但前提是农民必须采用这些技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Residential water choices: Assessing the willingness to adopt alternative water sources by examining risk perceptions and personal norms in Belgium Global nutrient content embedded in food losses and waste: Identifying the sources and magnitude along the food supply chain Global projections of plastic use, end-of-life fate and potential changes in consumption, reduction, recycling and replacement with bioplastics to 2050 What should be understood to promote environmentally sustainable diets? Transitioning towards circular households: Exploring influential factors and constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1