Kieran Heeley , Rafael L. Orozco , Imogen Sheppard , Lynne E. Macaskie , John Love , Bushra Al-Duri
{"title":"Assessment of Iron(III) chloride as a catalyst for the production of hydrogen from the supercritical water gasification of microalgae","authors":"Kieran Heeley , Rafael L. Orozco , Imogen Sheppard , Lynne E. Macaskie , John Love , Bushra Al-Duri","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2024.100198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alkali metal salts and supported transition metals have been the dominant catalysts used to maximise hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification (SCWG). Recently, FeCl<sub>3</sub> has emerged as an alternative to these that has been found to be more effective in some cases reported in literature. However, to these authors’ knowledge, few studies exist that study this catalyst with none that involve microalgae as the feedstock. Investigation is reported into the effect of FeCl<sub>3</sub> on the SCWG of <em>Chlorella vulgaris</em> for a range of temperatures (400–600<!--> <!-->°C) and biomass concentrations (1–3<!--> <!-->wt%), with comparisons made to other catalysts (KOH, Ru/C and their combinations). A significant decrease in hydrogen yield, carbon conversion and energy efficiency was observed with the addition of FeCl<sub>3</sub>, due to a reduced pH which suppressed the water gas shift reaction and catalysed of char forming reactions. This was in contrary to Ru/C and KOH catalysts, where those outcomes increased. Additionally, when FeCl<sub>3</sub> was used with Ru/C, the ruthenium was poisoned, nullifying its positive effects. Consequently, FeCl<sub>3</sub> is not a suitable catalyst for hydrogen production from microalgae, either alone or in conjunction with a ruthenium catalyst.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X24001030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Alkali metal salts and supported transition metals have been the dominant catalysts used to maximise hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification (SCWG). Recently, FeCl3 has emerged as an alternative to these that has been found to be more effective in some cases reported in literature. However, to these authors’ knowledge, few studies exist that study this catalyst with none that involve microalgae as the feedstock. Investigation is reported into the effect of FeCl3 on the SCWG of Chlorella vulgaris for a range of temperatures (400–600 °C) and biomass concentrations (1–3 wt%), with comparisons made to other catalysts (KOH, Ru/C and their combinations). A significant decrease in hydrogen yield, carbon conversion and energy efficiency was observed with the addition of FeCl3, due to a reduced pH which suppressed the water gas shift reaction and catalysed of char forming reactions. This was in contrary to Ru/C and KOH catalysts, where those outcomes increased. Additionally, when FeCl3 was used with Ru/C, the ruthenium was poisoned, nullifying its positive effects. Consequently, FeCl3 is not a suitable catalyst for hydrogen production from microalgae, either alone or in conjunction with a ruthenium catalyst.