The Sleep Course: An inclusive trial examining the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a digital sleep intervention for adults with self-reported sleep difficulties

Amelia J. Scott, Taylor Hathway, Madelyne A. Bisby, Nickolai Titov, Blake F. Dear
{"title":"The Sleep Course: An inclusive trial examining the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a digital sleep intervention for adults with self-reported sleep difficulties","authors":"Amelia J. Scott,&nbsp;Taylor Hathway,&nbsp;Madelyne A. Bisby,&nbsp;Nickolai Titov,&nbsp;Blake F. Dear","doi":"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBTi) is a well-established first-line treatment for insomnia and sleep difficulties, yet numerous barriers hinder its widespread adoption. One potential criticism of the existing evidence base for CBTi is that many trials exclude participants that would commonly be seen in in primary care, such as those aged over 65, with comorbid health conditions, or prescribed sleep medication. The current pilot study therefore aimed to assess the acceptability and efficacy of a brief, digitally delivered sleep intervention, the Sleep Course, using a broad range of participants. Participants (<em>n</em> = 74) completed the 6-week, 4-lesson intervention alongside measures of sleep disturbance, sleep-related impairment, depression, anxiety and sleep-wake patterns (via sleep diary). Generalized estimating equations analysis modelled change in participants' outcomes from pre- to post-treatment and 3-month follow-up, and subgroup analyses explored the role of possible moderators (e.g., age over 65, co-morbidities, and concurrent prescription medication use). The intervention was associated with good rates of satisfaction (79 %) and lesson completion (70 %). Results showed significant and large reductions in insomnia, sleep disturbance and associated symptoms (e.g., <em>d</em> = 1.06–1.37 change in insomnia symptoms). Evidence of high acceptability and clinical improvement was found irrespective of age, physical comorbidity, and sleep medication use. However, there was evidence of less improvement among those taking medications or having tried psychological treatment in the past. These results provide strong preliminary evidence for the intervention as an acceptable, efficacious and scalable treatment for a broad range of participants with sleep difficulties. Larger randomised controlled trials are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48615,"journal":{"name":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221478292400071X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBTi) is a well-established first-line treatment for insomnia and sleep difficulties, yet numerous barriers hinder its widespread adoption. One potential criticism of the existing evidence base for CBTi is that many trials exclude participants that would commonly be seen in in primary care, such as those aged over 65, with comorbid health conditions, or prescribed sleep medication. The current pilot study therefore aimed to assess the acceptability and efficacy of a brief, digitally delivered sleep intervention, the Sleep Course, using a broad range of participants. Participants (n = 74) completed the 6-week, 4-lesson intervention alongside measures of sleep disturbance, sleep-related impairment, depression, anxiety and sleep-wake patterns (via sleep diary). Generalized estimating equations analysis modelled change in participants' outcomes from pre- to post-treatment and 3-month follow-up, and subgroup analyses explored the role of possible moderators (e.g., age over 65, co-morbidities, and concurrent prescription medication use). The intervention was associated with good rates of satisfaction (79 %) and lesson completion (70 %). Results showed significant and large reductions in insomnia, sleep disturbance and associated symptoms (e.g., d = 1.06–1.37 change in insomnia symptoms). Evidence of high acceptability and clinical improvement was found irrespective of age, physical comorbidity, and sleep medication use. However, there was evidence of less improvement among those taking medications or having tried psychological treatment in the past. These results provide strong preliminary evidence for the intervention as an acceptable, efficacious and scalable treatment for a broad range of participants with sleep difficulties. Larger randomised controlled trials are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠课程:一项包容性试验,针对自我报告有睡眠困难的成年人,研究数字睡眠干预的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效
失眠认知行为疗法(CBTi)是治疗失眠和睡眠障碍的一种行之有效的一线疗法,但有许多障碍阻碍了它的广泛采用。CBTi现有证据基础的一个潜在诟病是,许多试验排除了初级保健中常见的参与者,如65岁以上、有合并症或服用睡眠药物的患者。因此,目前的试点研究旨在通过广泛的参与者来评估简短的数字式睡眠干预--"睡眠课程"--的可接受性和疗效。参与者(n = 74)在完成为期 6 周、共 4 课时的干预措施的同时,还对睡眠障碍、睡眠相关损伤、抑郁、焦虑和睡眠-觉醒模式(通过睡眠日记)进行了测量。广义估计方程分析模拟了参与者从治疗前到治疗后以及3个月随访期间的结果变化,分组分析探讨了可能的调节因素(如65岁以上、合并疾病和同时使用处方药)的作用。干预的满意率(79%)和课程完成率(70%)都很高。结果表明,失眠、睡眠障碍和相关症状明显大幅减少(例如,失眠症状的变化d = 1.06-1.37)。有证据表明,无论年龄、身体合并症和睡眠药物使用情况如何,该疗法都具有很高的可接受性和临床改善效果。不过,有证据表明,那些正在服用药物或过去曾尝试过心理治疗的人的症状改善程度较低。这些结果提供了有力的初步证据,证明该干预方法是一种可接受、有效且可推广的治疗方法,适用于有睡眠障碍的广大参与者。还需要进行更大规模的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.30%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) and the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII). The aim of Internet Interventions is to publish scientific, peer-reviewed, high-impact research on Internet interventions and related areas. Internet Interventions welcomes papers on the following subjects: • Intervention studies targeting the promotion of mental health and featuring the Internet and/or technologies using the Internet as an underlying technology, e.g. computers, smartphone devices, tablets, sensors • Implementation and dissemination of Internet interventions • Integration of Internet interventions into existing systems of care • Descriptions of development and deployment infrastructures • Internet intervention methodology and theory papers • Internet-based epidemiology • Descriptions of new Internet-based technologies and experiments with clinical applications • Economics of internet interventions (cost-effectiveness) • Health care policy and Internet interventions • The role of culture in Internet intervention • Internet psychometrics • Ethical issues pertaining to Internet interventions and measurements • Human-computer interaction and usability research with clinical implications • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on Internet interventions
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of a guided multicomponent internet and mobile gratitude training program - A pragmatic randomized controlled trial Psychotherapy 2.0 - Application context and effectiveness of sensor technology in psychotherapy with children and adolescents: A systematic review Change processes in cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder: A comparison of face-to-face and internet-based treatment formats Are there unique facets of therapeutic alliance for users of digital mental health interventions? An examination with the eHealth Therapeutic Alliance Inventory Predictors of participant compliance with ecological momentary assessment among individuals with chronic pain who are using cannabis and opioids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1