Perfect conformity to observable minimal rituals engenders trust: An experimental test of the signaling hypothesis

Jonathan H. W. Tan, Dinithi N. Jayasekara
{"title":"Perfect conformity to observable minimal rituals engenders trust: An experimental test of the signaling hypothesis","authors":"Jonathan H. W. Tan,&nbsp;Dinithi N. Jayasekara","doi":"10.1111/apps.12555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rituals are ubiquitous in organizations and society. Ritual conformity can signal one's commitment to the group and in turn engender trust. However, its signaling effect is elusive as cooperative individuals might self-select into groups that demand more conformism, as groups inculcate rituals promoting prosocial values and norms, or as it induces group biases in altruism and fairness. We experimentally test the causal signaling effect of rituals by manipulating the observability of conformity to synthetic <i>minimal rituals</i> across minimal groups in the laboratory. We find that only perfect and observable conformity in groups engenders increased trust. Non-conformity by group members erodes the trust of perfect conformists. Observing perfect conformity also increases ingroup sharing if reciprocity by co-players yields mutual benefit even when it is costless to unilaterally benefit others, but not when it yields neither mutual benefit nor welfare gains. Thus, we confirm that perfect conformity to observable rituals signals a commitment to mutual beneficence and in turn engenders trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rituals are ubiquitous in organizations and society. Ritual conformity can signal one's commitment to the group and in turn engender trust. However, its signaling effect is elusive as cooperative individuals might self-select into groups that demand more conformism, as groups inculcate rituals promoting prosocial values and norms, or as it induces group biases in altruism and fairness. We experimentally test the causal signaling effect of rituals by manipulating the observability of conformity to synthetic minimal rituals across minimal groups in the laboratory. We find that only perfect and observable conformity in groups engenders increased trust. Non-conformity by group members erodes the trust of perfect conformists. Observing perfect conformity also increases ingroup sharing if reciprocity by co-players yields mutual benefit even when it is costless to unilaterally benefit others, but not when it yields neither mutual benefit nor welfare gains. Thus, we confirm that perfect conformity to observable rituals signals a commitment to mutual beneficence and in turn engenders trust.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完全遵守可观察到的最低限度的仪式会产生信任:信号传递假说的实验验证
仪式在组织和社会中无处不在。遵守仪式可以表明一个人对群体的承诺,进而产生信任。然而,由于合作的个体可能会自我选择进入要求更多遵从的群体,由于群体会灌输促进亲社会价值观和规范的仪式,或者由于仪式会诱发利他主义和公平的群体偏差,因此仪式的信号效应难以捉摸。我们通过在实验室中操纵最小群体对合成最小仪式的可观察性,对仪式的因果信号效应进行了实验检验。我们发现,只有完美的、可观察到的群体一致性才能增加信任。群体成员的不合规行为会削弱完全合规者的信任。如果共同参与者的互惠行为能带来互利,即使单方面为他人谋利是无成本的,那么观察到完美的一致性也会增加群体内的分享,但如果互惠行为既不能带来互利,也不能带来福利收益,那么观察到完美的一致性就不会增加分享。因此,我们证实,完全遵守可观察到的仪式标志着对互利的承诺,进而产生信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Who uses abusive supervision to punish deviant employees? An integration of identity threat and self-regulation perspectives Nature, predictors, and outcomes of Nurses' trajectories of harmonious and obsessive passion Sowing the seeds of love: Cultivating perceptions of culture of companionate love through listening and its effects on organizational outcomes Leading while playing: How leader fun pursuit affects leadership perceptions and evaluations Time after time: The influence of perceived coworker overtime, affect and workaholism on daily withdrawal responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1