Stochastic route optimization under dynamic ground risk uncertainties for safe drone delivery operations

Bizhao Pang , Xinting Hu , Wei Dai , Kin Huat Low
{"title":"Stochastic route optimization under dynamic ground risk uncertainties for safe drone delivery operations","authors":"Bizhao Pang ,&nbsp;Xinting Hu ,&nbsp;Wei Dai ,&nbsp;Kin Huat Low","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for urban drone delivery introduces significant risks, particularly the potential for crash-induced fatalities on the ground. A crucial strategy to address this challenge is through risk assessment and mitigation of flight routes that consider the stochastic nature of urban populations. Traditional strategies treat drone flight route approval and execution independently, which fall short in such a dynamic risk environment where plans deemed safe at the strategic approval stage may later prove hazardous, and vice versa. To address these intricacies, this paper introduces a novel two-stage stochastic optimization model that integrates strategic route feasibility assessment with tactical route selection and timing adjustments. A unique aspect of our model is the implementation of a risk penalty that effectively bridges decisions between the two stages, thereby reducing the likelihood of decision errors caused by stochastic variations. Through extensive simulations within Singapore’s urban context, our model demonstrates a risk reduction by an average of 36.13%, which significantly outperforms traditional methods. This performance consistency across 100 simulated urban scenarios proved the robustness and broad applicability of our model. Furthermore, our model shows an 18% improvement in resolving potential decision errors, with the stochastic solution further affirming a notable risk decrease of 27.18%. Our research enhances the domain of UAS risk-based stochastic decision making and provides opportunities for automated flight approval, drone fleet management, and urban airspace management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 103717"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524003089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for urban drone delivery introduces significant risks, particularly the potential for crash-induced fatalities on the ground. A crucial strategy to address this challenge is through risk assessment and mitigation of flight routes that consider the stochastic nature of urban populations. Traditional strategies treat drone flight route approval and execution independently, which fall short in such a dynamic risk environment where plans deemed safe at the strategic approval stage may later prove hazardous, and vice versa. To address these intricacies, this paper introduces a novel two-stage stochastic optimization model that integrates strategic route feasibility assessment with tactical route selection and timing adjustments. A unique aspect of our model is the implementation of a risk penalty that effectively bridges decisions between the two stages, thereby reducing the likelihood of decision errors caused by stochastic variations. Through extensive simulations within Singapore’s urban context, our model demonstrates a risk reduction by an average of 36.13%, which significantly outperforms traditional methods. This performance consistency across 100 simulated urban scenarios proved the robustness and broad applicability of our model. Furthermore, our model shows an 18% improvement in resolving potential decision errors, with the stochastic solution further affirming a notable risk decrease of 27.18%. Our research enhances the domain of UAS risk-based stochastic decision making and provides opportunities for automated flight approval, drone fleet management, and urban airspace management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态地面风险不确定性下的随机路线优化,实现无人机安全送货作业
无人驾驶航空器系统(UAS)在城市无人机投递领域的兴起带来了巨大的风险,尤其是在地面上发生坠机导致死亡的可能性。应对这一挑战的关键策略是对飞行路线进行风险评估和缓解,并考虑城市人口的随机性。传统战略将无人机飞行路线的审批和执行独立开来,在这种动态风险环境中,战略审批阶段认为安全的计划可能会被证明是危险的,反之亦然。为了解决这些错综复杂的问题,本文介绍了一种新颖的两阶段随机优化模型,该模型将战略航线可行性评估与战术航线选择和时机调整相结合。我们的模型的一个独特之处在于实施了风险惩罚,有效地在两个阶段的决策之间架起了桥梁,从而降低了因随机变化而导致决策失误的可能性。通过对新加坡城市环境的大量模拟,我们的模型平均降低了 36.13% 的风险,明显优于传统方法。在 100 个模拟的城市场景中,这种性能的一致性证明了我们模型的稳健性和广泛适用性。此外,我们的模型在解决潜在决策错误方面有 18% 的改进,随机解决方案进一步证实了 27.18% 的显著风险下降。我们的研究增强了无人机系统基于风险的随机决策领域,为自动飞行审批、无人机机队管理和城市空域管理提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Fleet sizing and pricing for hybrid ownership of shared autonomous vehicles in a multimodal transportation system Supplier and platform led games of supplier encroachment Data-driven resilience analysis of the global container shipping network against two cascading failures Towards advanced decision-making support for shipping safety: A functional connectivity analysis The Impact of ISSB’s Scope 3 GHG Emissions Validation on US Manufacturers’ Stock Valuations: Analyzing the Role of Supplier Complexity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1